The national championship game in Division IA football is selected in part by voters. Are the voters biased? Examining all weekly rankings from 2004 to 2008, the authors find the following results. Voters in the USA Today (Coaches’) Poll tend to rank their team’s recent opponents 4.3 places higher than the average voting coach and rank the recent opponents of their alma mater 3.2 places higher. Additionally, both coaches and sports media (AP Poll) overassess teams who play in certain Bowl Championship Series (BCS) conferences relative to non-BCS conferences and reward ‘‘running up the score’’ by voting teams with high offensive output above their peers.
Lebovic, J.H., & Sigelman, L. ( 2001). The forecasting accuracy and determinants of football rankings. International Journal of Forecasting, 17, 105-120.
2.
Logan, T. ( 2007). Whoa, Nellie! Empirical tests of college football’s conventional wisdom. NBER Working Paper Series. Retrieved June 3, 2009, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w13596
3.
Offerman, T., & Sonnemans, J. ( 2004). What’s causing overreaction? An experimental investigation of recency and the hot hand effect. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106, 533-554.
4.
Paul, R.J., Weinbach, A.P., & Coate, P. ( 2007). Expectations and voting in the NCAA football polls: The wisdom of point spread markets. Journal of Sports Economics , 8, 412-424.
5.
Vergin, R.C. ( 2001). Overreaction in the NFL point spread market. Applied Financial Economics, 11, 497-509.
