A growing literature examines adverse behavior as unintended consequences of incentives. We test Lazear’s hypothesis that states that if rewards were dependent solely on relative performance then an increase in rewards would induce agents to engage in sabotage activity to reduce rivals’ output. We test this hypothesis using the natural experiment of a rule change in Spanish football, the increase in points for winning a league match from two to three. We find, consistent with Lazear’s hypothesis, that teams in a winning position were more likely to commit offences punishable by dismissal of a player after this change.
Abrevaya, J. ( 2004). Fit to be tied: The incentive effects of overtime rules in professional hockey. Journal of Sports Economics, 5, 292-306.
2.
Allen, W.D. ( 2002). Crime, punishment and recidivism: Lessons from the National Hockey League. Journal of Sports Economics, 3, 39-60.
3.
Brocas, I., & Carrillo, J. ( 2004). Do the ‘three-point victory’ and ‘golden goal’ rules make soccer more exciting? Journal of Sports Economics, 5, 169-185.
4.
Buraimo, B., Forrest, D., & Simmons, R. (IN Press). The twelfth man? Refereeing bias in English and German soccer. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A.
5.
Caliendo, M., & Radic, D. ( 2006). Ten do it better, do they? An empirical analysis of an old football myth. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2158.
6.
Correira-Guedes, J., & Machado, F. ( 2002). Changing rewards in contests: Has the three-point rule brought more offense to soccer? Empirical Economics, 27, 607-630.
7.
Dawson, P., Dobson, S., Goddard, J., & Wilson, J. ( 2007). Are football referees really biased and inconsistent? Evidence on the incidence of disciplinary sanction in the English Premier League. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 170, 231-250.
8.
Dilger, A., & Geyer, H. ( 2009). Are three points for a win really better than two? A comparison of German soccer league and cup games. Journal of Sports Economics, DOI: 10.1177/ 1527002508327521. 10, 305-318.
9.
Frick, B., & Simmons, R. ( 2008). The allocation of rewards in athletic contests. In B. Humphreys, & D. Howard (Eds.), The Business of Sports Vol. 2 Economic Perspectives on Sport. Westport, CT: Praeger.
10.
García, J., & Rodríguez, P. (2002). The determinants of football match attendance revisited: Empirical evidence from the Spanish Football League . Journal of Sports Economics, 3, 18-38.
11.
Garicano, L., & Palacios-Huerta, I. (2006). Sabotage in tournaments: Making the beautiful game a bit less beautiful. Working paper. Research Paper, Department of Economics, Brown University, Providence.
12.
Garicano, L., Palacios-Huerta, I., & Prendergast, C. (2005). Favoritism under social pressure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87, 208-216.
13.
Haugen, K. ( 2008). Point score systems and competitive imbalance in professional soccer. Journal of Sports Economics, 9, 191-210.
14.
Heckelman, J., & Yates, A. ( 2003). And a hockey game broke out: Crime and punishment in the NHL. Economic Inquiry, 41, 705-712.
15.
Jacob, B., & Levitt, S. ( 2003). Rotten apples: An investigation of the prevalence and prediction of teacher cheating. Quarterly Journal of Economics , 118, 843-877.
16.
Lazear, E. ( 1989). Pay equality and industrial politics. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 561-580.
17.
Levitt, S. ( 2002). Testing the economic model of crime: The National Hockey League’s two-referee experiment. The Berkeley Electronic Journals in Economic Analysis & Policy, 1, 1-19.
18.
Palacios-Huerta, I. ( 2004). Structural breaks during a century of the world’s most popular sport. Statistical Methods and Applications, 13, 241-258.
19.
Rickman, N., & Witt, R. ( 2008). Favouritism and financial incentives: A natural experiment . Economica, 75, 296-309.
20.
Ridder, G., Cramer, J., & Hopstaken, P. ( 1994). Down to ten: Estimating the effect of a red card in soccer . Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 1124-1127.
21.
Simmons, R. ( 2008). Fan pressure and football outcomes. In P. Andersson, P. Ayton , & C. Schmidt (Eds.), Myths and facts about football: The economics and psychology of the world’s greatest game. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.
22.
Sutter, M., & Kocher, M. ( 2004). Favoritism of agents- the case of referees’ home bias. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25, 461-469.
23.
Torgler, B. ( 2004). The economics of the FIFA Football World Cup. Kyklos, 57, 287-300.
24.
Witt, R. ( 2005). Do players react to sanction changes? Evidence from the English Premier League. Scottish Journal of Political Economy , 52, 623-640.
