The effects of the three-point rule in the first league German soccer are tested empirically and compared to games from the German cup competition. The inclusion of cup games ensures that changes in league games can be attributed to the three-point rule. As a result of their relative devaluation, the number of draws should decrease. Furthermore, an increase in the number of close wins is expected. The strategy of a leading team becomes more defensive, resulting in fewer goal shootings by that team, as well as fewer shooting opportunities for the opponent. Empirical evidence supporting these effects is found.
Abadie, A. (2005). Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators . Review of Economic Studies, 72, 1-19.
2.
Amann, E., Dewenter, R., & Namini, J.E. (2004). The Home-Bias Paradox in Football. Discussion Paper, University of Duisburg-Essen , Essen.
3.
Aylott, M., & Aylott, N. (2007). A meeting of social science and football: Measuring the effects of three points for a win. Sports in Science, 10, 205-222.
4.
Banerjee, A.N., Swinnen, J.F.M., & Weersink, A. (2006). Skating on thin ice: Rule change and team strategies in the NHL. Discussion Paper, LICOS Centre for Transition Economics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven .
5.
Baş levent, C., & Tunalı, I. (2001). Incentives and outcomes in football: The effect of the three-points system and home advantage on outcomes . Retrieved Febuary 21, 2008, from http://smye2002.univ-paris1.fr/program/paper/e5_bas.doc.
6.
Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 249-275.
7.
Brocas, I., & Carrillo, J.D. (2004). Do the `Three-Point Victory' and `Golden Goal' rules make soccer more exciting? A theoretical analysis of a simple game. Journal of Sports Economics, 5, 169-185.
8.
Dewenter, R. (2003). Raising the scores? Empirical evidence on the introduction of the three-point rule in Portuguese football. Discussion Paper, Institute of Economic Policy, University of the Federal Armed Forces, Hamburg.
9.
DFB (2008a). Bundesliga: Archive . Retrieved December 03, 2008, from http://www.dfb.de/index.php?id=320005
10.
DFB (2008b). DFB Cup Men: Archive . Retrieved December 03, 2008, from http://www.dfb.de/index.php?id=460071
11.
DFB (2008c). DFB-Pokal der Männer: Modus. Retrieved July 03, 2008, from http://www.dfb.de/index.php?id=160547
12.
Guedes, J.C., & Machado, F.S. (2002). Changing rewards in contests: Has the three-point-rule brought more offense to soccer? Empirical Economics, 27, 607-630.
13.
Garicano, L., & Palacios-Huerta, I. (2006). Sabotage in tournaments: Making the beautiful game a bit less beautiful. Research Paper, Department of Economics, Brown University , Providence.
14.
Hardy, M.A. (1993). Regression with dummy variables. SAGE University Papers, Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences (Vol. 93) . Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications .
15.
Hundsdoerfer, J. (2004). Fördert die 3-Punkte-Regel den offensiven Fußball? In P. Hammann, L. Schmidt & M. Welling (Eds.), Ökonomie des Fußballs: Grundlegungen aus volks- und betriebswirtschaftlicher Perspektive. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.
16.
Klotz, S., & Gerhard, F. (2000). Three may be less than two: The impact of reward systems on the strategy of soccer teams. Mimeo: COFE, University of Konstanz.
17.
Moschini, G. (2008). Incentives and outcomes in a strategic setting: The 3-points-for-a-win system in soccer. Department of Economics Working Paper Series, Iowa State University.
18.
Shepotylo, O. (2006). Three-point-for-win in soccer rule: Are there incentives for match fixing? In O. Shepotylo (Ed.), Three essays on institutions and economic development . College Park: Doctoral Dissertation, University of Maryland, Department of Economics.
19.
Weinrich, M., & Grüne, H. (2000). Deutsche Pokalgeschichte seit 1935: Enzyklopädie des deutschen Ligafußballs. Kassel: Agon-Sportverlag.
