Proponents of big-time intercollegiate athletics highlight the public relations produced by successful programs and how this supports the educational mission. In the sports economics literature, this is called the "advertising effect,'' and several studies have found little or no effects for big-time basketball programs. Such conclusions may be premature because most analyses use subsets of all schools playing Division I basketball. The author analyzes how performance is related to academic quality in the first year class using all Division I schools during a 12-year panel. Neither the proportion of freshmen from the top 10th of their high school class, or with a grade point average of B or better, nor the number of entering National Merit Scholars are significantly related to measures of success. Freshman SAT scores are marginally related to one aspect of basketball performance. The conditions needed for a basketball advertising effect appear fleeting and difficult to accomplish.
Amato, L., J.M. Gandar, I.B. Tucker, & R.A. Zuber. (1996). Bowls versus playoffs: The impact on football player graduation rates in the National Collegiate Athletic Association . Economics of Education Review, 15(2), 187-195.
2.
Baade, R.A., & J.O. Sundberg . (1996). Fourth down and gold to go? Assessing the link between athletics and alumni giving. Social Science Quarterly, 77(4), 789-803.
3.
Brooker, G., & T.D. Klastorin . (1981). To the victors belong the spoils? College athletics and alumni giving. Social Science Quarterly, 62(4), 744-750.
4.
Bremmer, D.S., & R.G. Kesselring . (1993). The advertising effect of university athletic success: A reappraisal of the evidence. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 33, 409-421
5.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. 2007. Retrieved February 1, 2007, from http://www.carnegiefoundation.org
6.
Chressanthis, G.A., & P.W. Grimes. (1993). Intercollegiate sports success and first-year student enrollment demand. Sociology of Sport Journal , 10(3), 286-300.
7.
Chronicle of Higher Education. N.d. Retrieved April 12, 2007 , from http://chronicle.com.
8.
Coughlin, C.C., & O.H. Erekson. (1985). Contributions to intercollegiate athletic programs: Further evidence. Social Science Quarterly, 66(1), 194-202.
9.
Frank, R.H. (2004). Challenging the myth: A review of the links among college athletic success, student quality, and donations. Paper commissioned by the Knight Foundation Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics. Retrieved November 29, 2005, from http://www.knightfdn.org
10.
Macmillan.Various years. The college blue book. New York: Author.
11.
McCormick, R.E., & M. Tinsley. (1987). Athletics versus academics? Evidence from SAT scores. Journal of Political Economy, 95(5), 1103-1116.
12.
McCormick, R.E., & M. Tinsley. (1990). Athletics and academics: A model of university contributions. In B. L. Goff & R. D. Tollison (Eds.), Sportometrics (pp. 193-204). College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
13.
McEvoy, C. (2005). The relationship between dramatic changes in team performance and undergraduate admissions applications. SMART Journal, 2(1), 17-24.
14.
Mixon, F.C., Jr. (1995). Athletics versus academics? Rejoining the evidence from SAT scores. Education Economics, 95(3), 277-283.
15.
Mixon, F.C., Jr., & R.W. Ressler. (1995). An empirical note on the impact of college athletics on tuition revenues. Applied Economics Letters , 2, 383-387.
16.
Murphy, R.G., & G.A. Trandel. (1994). The relation between a university's football record and the size of its applicant pool. Economics of Education Review, 13(3), 265-270.
17.
Ncaa. N.d. Headlines. Retrieved December 21, 2006, from http://www.ncaa.org/wps/portal
18.
Rhoads, T.A., & S. Gerking. (2000). Educational contributions, academic quality, and athletic success. Contemporary Economic Policy , 18(2), 248-258.
19.
Rishe, P.J. (2003). A reexamination of how athletic success impacts graduation rates: Comparing student-athletes to all other undergraduates. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 62(2), 407-427.
20.
Sigelman, L., & S. Bookheimer . (1983). Is it whether you win or lose? Monetary contributions to big-time college athletic programs. Social Science Quarterly, 64(2), 347-359
21.
St. John, E.P. (2000). The impact of student aid on recruitment and retention: What the research indicates. New Directions for Student Services , 89, 61-75.
22.
The College Board.Various years. The college handbook. New York: Author.
23.
Toma, J.D., & M.E. Cross. (1998). Intercollegiate athletics and student college choice: Exploring the impact of championship seasons on undergraduate applications. Research in Higher Education, 39(6), 633-661.
24.
Tucker, I.B. (2004). A reexamination of the effect of big-time football and basketball success on graduation rates and alumni giving rates. Economics of Education Review, 23, 655-661.
25.
Tucker, I.B. (2005). Big-time pigskin success: Is there an advertising effect? Journal of Sports Economics, 6(2), 222-229.
26.
Tucker, I.B., & L. Amato. (1993). Does big-time success in football or basketball affect SAT scores? Economics of Education Review , 12(2), 177-181.
27.
Tucker, I.B., & L.T. Amato. (2006). A reinvestigation of the relationship between big-time basketball success and average SAT scores. Journal of Sports Economics, 7(4), 428-440.
