Past research measures the nonmarket benefits of sports stadiums and arenas but does not address the issues of temporal embedding or ordering effects. Temporal embedding exists if survey respondents do not differentiate between payment-period lengths and leads to unrealistic implicit discount rates. Multiple scenarios with alternative sports teams can lead to ordering effects that influence the nonmarket value of teams. This study elicits annual payments over different fixed time horizons (e.g., 5 or 10 years) for two teams in a city with a single professional sports team. We find that willingness to pay is sensitive to the length of the payment period. In one of two cases the ordering of the scenario weakly affects willingness to pay.
Bergstrom, J. C. (1990). Concepts and measures of the economic value of environmental quality: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 31, 215-228.
2.
Bockstael, N. E., Strand, I. E., McConnell, K. E., & Arsanjani, F. (1990). Sample selection bias in the estimation of recreation demand functions: An application to sport fishing. Land Economics, 66(1), 40-49.
3.
Bohara, A., McKee, M., Berrens, R., Jenkins-Smith, H., Silva, C., & Brookshire, D. (1998). Effect of cost and group-size information on willingness to pay responses: Open-ended vs. dichotomous choice. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 35, 142-163.
4.
Boyle, K. J., Welsh, M. P., & Bishop, R. C. (1993). The role of question order and respondent experience in contingent-valuation studies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 25(1), S80-S99.
5.
Carson, R., Flores, N. E., & Hanemann, W. M. (1998). Sequencing and valuing public goods. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 36(3), 314-323.
6.
Coates, D., & Humphreys, B. (1999). The growth effects of sport franchises, stadia, and arenas. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18(4), 601-624.
7.
Fenn, A. J., & Crooker, J. R. (2003, July). The willingness to pay for a new Vikings stadium. Paper presented at the 2003 Western Economics Association Meetings, Denver, CO.
8.
Greene, W. H. (1997). Econometric analysis (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9.
Greene, W. H. (2002). LIMDEP version 8.0: User’s manual. Bellport, NY: Econometric Software.
10.
Hoehn, J. P., & Loomis, J. B. (1993). Substitution effects in the valuation of multiple environmental programs. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 25 (Pt. 1), 56-75.
11.
Hoehn, J. P., & Randall, A. (1989). Too many proposals pass the benefit cost test. American Economic Review, 79, 544-551.
12.
Johnson, B. K., Groothuis, P. A., & Whitehead, J. C. (2001). The value of public goods generated by a major league sports team: The CVM approach. Journal of Sports Economics, 2(1), 6-21.
13.
Johnson, B. K., & Whitehead, J. C. (2000). Value of public goods from sports stadiums and arenas: The CVM approach. Contemporary Economic Policy, 18(1), 48-58.
14.
Kahneman, D., & Knetsch, J. L. (1992). Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22(1), 57-70.
15.
Kim, S.-I., & Haab, T. C. (2003). Temporal sensitivity of willingness to pay and implied discount rates (Working Paper). Columbus: The Ohio State University, Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics.
16.
Loewenstein, G., & Thaler, R. H. (1989). Intertemporal choice. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(4), 181-194.
17.
Noll, R. G., & Zimbalist, A. (Eds.). (1997). Sports, jobs, and taxes: The economic impact of sports teams and stadiums. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
18.
Rappaport, J., & Wilkerson, C. (2001, January). What are the benefits of hosting a major league sports franchise?Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review, 55-86.
19.
Siegfried, J., & Zimbalist, A. (2000). The economics of sports facilities and their communities. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 95-114.
20.
Silberberg, E., & Suen, W. (2000). The structure of economics (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.
Smith, V. K. (1992. Arbitrary values, good causes, and premature verdicts: Comment. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22, 71-89.
22.
Stadiums and arenas under construction. (2002, December 30). Sports Business News, pp. 48-49.
23.
Stevens, T. H., DeCoteau, N. E., & Willis, C. E. (1997). Sensitivity of contingent valuation to alternative payment schedules. Land Economics, 73(1), 140-148.
24.
Stewart, J. M., O’Shea, E., Donaldson, C., & Shackley, P. (2002). Do ordering effects matter in willingness-to-pay studies of health care?Journal of Health Economics, 21, 585-599.
25.
Stumborg, B. E., Baerenklau, K. A., & Bishop, R. C. (2001). Nonpoint source pollution and present values: A contingent valuation study of Lake Mendota. Review of Agricultural Economics, 23(1), 120-132.
26.
Whitehead, J. C., Blomquist, G. C., Hoban, T. L., & Clifford, W. B. (1995). Assessing the validity and reliability of contingent values: A comparison of on-site users, off-site users and non-users. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29(2), 238-251.
