Overtime! Rules and Incentives in the National Hockey League

Abstract

We construct a simple 2-period game model to determine the effects of recent National Hockey League rule changes on team incentives to win. The effects differ depending on the relative quality of the contestants and whether the contestants compete in the same conference. The model predicts that the average number of points during a season will rise, yet the average point differential among clubs within the same conference will fall. The model also predicts that the expected value of points per contest will be higher when playing nonconference opponents but lower when playing conference opponents. Because only a small percentage of contests are nonconference, we predict that more effort will be devoted to conference contests, particularly by lesser-talented clubs. The result is more competitive and exciting conference games requiring fewer overtime periods and potential ties. Empirical data support these hypotheses.

Keywords

revenue sharing sports league talent conjectures

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen, W. (2002). Crime, punishment, and recidivism: Lessons from the National Hockey League. Journal of Sports Economics, 3(1), 39-60.

Campbell, C. (2001, October 19). Hockey faces off against prime time news. Carleton University Capital News, C3.

Czarnitzki, D. , & Stadtmann, G. (2002). Uncertainty of outcome versus reputation: Empirical evidence for the first German Football Division. Empirical Economics, 27(1), 101-112.

Dixon, M. , & Coles, S. (1997). Modelling association football scores and inefficiencies in the football betting market. Applied Statistics, 46, 265-280.

Fisher, E. (2002, June 9). Sports switch off. The Washington Times, article no. 200206101006360022.

Hockeynut.com. (2003a). NHL standings (1998-99). Retrieved November 15, 2003, from http://www.hockeynut.com/9899/stand9899.html

Hockeynut.com. (2003b). NHL standings (1999-2000). Retrieved November 15, 2003, from http://www.hockeynut.com/9900/stand9900.html

Hockeynut.com. (2003c). NHL standings (2000-01). Retrieved November 15, 2003, from http://www.hockeynut.com/0001/stand0001.html

Hockeynut.com. (2003d). Results of the 1998-99 regular season. Retrieved November 15, 2003, from http://www.hockeynut.com/9899/results9899.html

10.

Hockeynut.com. (2003e). Results of the 1999-2000 regular season. Retrieved November 15, 2003, from http://www.hockeynut.com/9900/results9900.html

11.

Hockeynut.com. (2003f). Results of the 2000-01 regular season. Retrieved November 15, 2003, from http://www.hockeynut.com/0001/results0001.html

12.

Humphreys, B. (2002). Alternative measures of competitive balance in a sports league. Journal of Sports Economics, 3(2), 133-148.

13.

Kahane, L. (2001). Team and player effects on NHL player salaries: A hierarchical linear model approach. Applied Economics Letters, 8(9), 629-632.

14.

Karlis, D. , & Ntzoufras, I. (2003, October). Analysis of sports data using bivariate Poisson models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 52(3), 381-393.

15.

Maher, M. (1982). Modelling association football scores. Statistica Neerlandica, 36, 109-118.

16.

Marburger, D. (2002). Property rights and unilateral player transfers in a multiconference sports league. Journal of Sports Economics, 3(2), 122-132.

17.

Maxcy, J. , Fort, R. , & Krautmann, A. (2002). The effectiveness of incentive mechanisms in Major League Baseball. Journal of Sports Economics, 3(3), 246-255.

18.

Rule 89—overtime. (2003). Retrieved April 16, 2003, from http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/hockey/nhl/news/1999/09/27/rules_overtime

19.

Schmidt, M. , & Berri, D. (2001). Competitive balance and attendance: The case of major league baseball. Journal of Sports Economics, 2D(2), 145-167.

20.

Scully, G. W. (1989). The business of major league baseball. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

21.

Shoalts, D. (2002, December 21). Fan erosion neglected at NHL’s risk. The Globe and Mail, S3.

22.

Strauss, L. (1998, September-October). Does money tilt the playing field? Columbia Journalism Review,8.

23.

Szymanski, S. (2001). Income inequality, competitive balance and the attractiveness of team sports: Some evidence and a natural experiment from English soccer. Economic Journal, 111(4), 69-84.

24.

Taylor, B. , & Trogdon, J. (2002). Losing to win: Tournament incentives in the National Basketball Association. Journal of Labor Economics, 20(1), 23-41.