The 2002 negotiations between owners and players in major league baseball attracted national attention because of the history of past work stoppages in the sport. This article examines eight reasons why the negotiations successfully avoided a shutdown. Perhaps the most important of these reasons was that the players really did not want to strike— despite their announced intention to do so. The 232-day 1994-95 baseball strike, the longest ever in professional team sports, was devastating to both sides, and neither wanted to go through a similar experience.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Grover, R. (2002, June 3). Diamondbacks in the rough—again. Business Week, p. 74.
2.
Newhan, R. (2002, May 17). Commissioner says 6 to 8 teams in peril. Los Angeles Times, p. B1.
3.
Ozanian, M. K., & Badenhausen, K. (2002, July 17). Baseball owners, deep in debt, can still avert a strike. Wall Street Journal, p. D12.
4.
Staudohar, P. D. (1997). The baseball strike of 1994-95. Monthly Labor Review, 120(3), 26.
5.
Staudohar, P. D. (Ed.). (2000). Diamond mines: Baseball and labor. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
6.
Verducci, T. (2002, September 9). Everything to Fehr. Sports Illustrated, p. 38.
7.
Zimbalist, A. (2003). Labor relations in Major League Baseball. Journal of Sports Economics, 4(4), 332-355.