Discussions of competitive imbalance use Major League Baseball as a focal point, and proposed remedies center on redistributions of revenues from well-heeled owners to financially strapped franchises. However, there are also many additional aspects in sports that do not involve allocations of economic resources directly but nevertheless affect outcomes and balance among competitors. All leagues and associations have to confront the fundamental issue of relative strengths between adversaries. To create some semblance of balance and ensure the integrity of play, they place constraints on the competitive process and respond to technological changes that threaten to disrupt the current environment, including the use of performance-enhancing inputs. Although we extol the virtues of natural athletes and level playing fields with regard to skill development, ensuring evenly matched contests, and comparing performances over time, there are arguably no consistent, objective standards we can employ. Imbalance is an inherent, intractable part of all competitions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abraham, M. (Producer), & Raimi, S. (Director). (1999). For love of the game [Motion picture]. United States: Universal Pictures.
2.
Akerlof, G. (1976, November). The economics of caste and of the rat race and other woeful tales. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90(4), 599-617.
3.
Andre, J., & James, D. N. (1991). Rethinking college athletics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
4.
Avnet, J. (Producer), Kerner, J. (Producer), & Brill, S. (Director). (1992). The Mighty Ducks [Motion picture]. United States: Walt Disney Pictures.
5.
Barra, A. (2002, February 15). Bigger and better?The Wall Street Journal, p.W4.
6.
Berry, S. M. (2001). How ferocious is Tiger?Chance, 14(3), 51-56.
7.
Breen, P. M. (Producer), & Levinson, B. (Director). (1984). The natural [Motion picture]. United States: TriStar Pictures.
8.
Carlton, D. W., Frankel, A. S., & Landes, E. M. (2001, April). The control of externalities in sports leagues: An analysis of restrictions in the National Hockey League. Unpublished manuscript.
9.
Coleman, D. (1994, October 11). Peak performance: Why records fall. The New York Times, pp. B5, B10.
10.
Costas, B. (2000). Fair ball. New York: Broadway Books.
11.
Daly, J. (Producer), & Anspaugh, D. (Director). (1986). Hoosiers [Motion picture]. United States: Orion Pictures Corporation.
12.
Fayed, D. (Producer), & Hudson, H. (Director). (1981). Chariots of fire [Motion picture]. United Kingdom: Warner Bros.
13.
Frank, R. H., & Cook, P. J. (1995). The winner-take-all society. New York: Free Press.
14.
Galenson, D. W. (1993, Summer). The impact of economic and technological change on the careers of American men tennis players, 1960-1991. Journal of Sport History, 20(2), 127-150.
15.
Galenson, D. W. (1995, Spring). Does youth rule? Trends in the ages of American women tennis players, 1960-1992. Journal of Sport History, 22(1), 47-59.
16.
Gladwell, M. (2001, September 10). Drugstore athlete. The New Yorker, p.59.
17.
Johnson, B. (Producer), & Crowe, C. (Director). (1996). Jerry McGuire [Motion picture]. United States: TriStar Pictures.
18.
Kirkwood, G. (Producer), & Avildsen, J. G. (Director). (1976). Rocky [Motion picture]. United States: United Artists.
19.
Klawans, H. L. (1996). Why Michael couldn’t hit. New York: Freeman.
20.
Kolata, G. (1999, July 11). Slippery slope on the playing field. The New York Times, p.18.
21.
Laband, D. N. (1990). How the structure of competition influences performance in professional sports: The case of tennis and golf. In B. L. Goff & R. D. Tollison (Eds.), Sportometrics (pp. 133-150). College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
22.
Landau, S. B. (Producer), & Turteltaub, J. (Director). (1993). Cool runnings [Motion picture]. United States: Walt Disney Pictures.
23.
Lazear, E., & Rosen, S. (1981). Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 841-864.
24.
Levin, R. C., Mitchell, G. J., Volcker, P. A., & Will, G. F. (2000). The report of the independent members of the commissioner’s Blue Ribbon Panel on Baseball Economics. New York: Major League Baseball.
25.
Levinson, D., & Christensen, K. (Eds.). (1999). Encyclopedia of world sport. New York: Oxford University Press.
26.
Quirk, J., & Fort, R. (1992). Pay dirt: The business of professional team sports. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
27.
Quirk, J., & Fort, R. (1999). Hard ball: The abuse of power in pro team sports. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
Rosen, S. (1981, December). The economics of superstars. American Economic Review, 7, 845-898.
29.
Rosen, S. (1986, September). Prizes and incentives in elimination tournaments. American Economic Review, 76(4), 701-715.
30.
Rosen, S., & Sanderson, A. (2001, February). Labour markets in professional sports. Economic Journal, 111(469), F47-F68.
31.
Rosenberg, M. (Producer), & Ward, D. S. (Director). (1989). Major league [Motion picture]. United States: Mirage.
32.
Rottenberg, S. (1956, June). The baseball players’ labor market. Journal of Political Economy, 64, 242-258.
33.
Sanderson, A. R., & Rasinski, K. (1999). No place like home?Oeconomica, 1(1), 11-19.
34.
Scully, G. W. (1995). The market structure of sports. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
35.
Taylor, B. A., & Trogden, J. G. (2002). Losing to win: Tournament incentives in the National Basketball Association. Journal of Labor Economics, 20(1), 23-41.
36.
Time works against a suit made for speed. (2000, April 25). The New York Times, p. A29.
37.
Vecsey, G. (2001, September 5). Opponents had met before. The New York Times, p.21.
38.
Weiler, P. (2000). Leveling the playing field. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
