Practice Issues for Evaluation and Management of the Suicidal Left Ventricular Assist Device Patient

Abstract

There is a high prevalence of depression among left ventricular assist device patients, who present with an increased risk of suicidality given access to means via the device either with nonadherence or disconnection. Suicidality via device nonadherence/disconnection is an underresearched clinical issue, as paradoxically this life-saving procedure can also provide a method of lethal means to patients with significant mental health concerns. A case study is used to highlight the course of an attempted suicide by ventricular assistive device nonadherence. Clinical implications and recommendations for practice include a thorough psychological evaluation presurgery, monitoring quality of life and coping styles before and after placement, psychological testing, outlining specific suicide protocols, psychiatric care considerations for patients with highly specialized medical devices, and related ethical concerns.

Keywords

left ventricular assist device LVAD suicide depression noncompliance nonadherence

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kirklin

Naftel

Pagani

, et al. Sixth INTERMACS annual report: a 10,000-patient database. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014;33(6):555–564. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2014.04.010.

Newhouse

Jiang

. Heart failure and depression. Heart Fail Clin. 2014; 10(2):295–304. doi:10.1016/j.hfc.2013.10.004.

National Institute of Mental Health. 2019. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/major-depression.shtml. Accessed September 20, 2019.

Qin

Hawton

Mortensen

Webb

. Combined effects of physical illness and comorbid psychiatric disorder on the risk of suicide in a national population study. Brit J Psychiatry. 2014;204(6):430–435. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.113.128785.

Dew

DiMartini

Dobbels

, et al. The 2018 ISHLT/APM/AST/ICCAC/STSW recommendations for the psychosocial evaluation of adult cardiothoracic transplant candidates and candidates for long-term mechanical circulatory support. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018;37(7):803–823. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2018.03.005.

McDowell

. Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. 3rd ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2006.

Tigges-Limmer

Schonbrodt

Roefe

Arusoglu

Morshuis

Gummert

. Suicide after ventricular assist device implementation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010;29(6):692–694. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2009.12.005.

Mueller

Swetz

Freeman

, et al. Ethical analysis of withdrawing ventricular assist device support. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85(9):791–797. doi:10.4065/mcp.2010.0113.

Swetz

Freeman

AbouEzzeddine

, et al. Palliative medicine consultation for preparedness planning in patients receiving left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86(6):493–500. doi:10.4065/mcp.2010.0747.

10.

Reynard

Butler

McKee

Starling

Gorodeski

. Frequency of depression and anxiety before and after insertion of a continuous flow left ventricular assist device. Am J Cardiol. 2014;114(3):433–440. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.05.015.