Adherence of patients to transplantation regimens has been problematic. Patient self-management of the chronic diseases that frequently lead to transplantation is now the standard of practice, although that practice has been incompletely implemented. Through its focus on developing patients' skills and confidence in their ability to perform medical management, maintain important life roles, and manage the negative emotions that often accompany chronic conditions, patient self-management has the potential to support effective adherence of patients in an ethically satisfactory way. A professional decision to transplant should carry with it a commitment to help patients self-manage, including patients with low levels of literacy. Viewing adherence as patients' work to be accomplished within a framework of patient self-management offers an option for improving transplant outcomes. Testing this option is an important next step.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RedmanBK. Patient Self Management of Chronic Disease: The Health Care Provider's Challenge.Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett; 2004.
2.
BarlowJWrightCSheasbyJTurnerAHainsworthJ. Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: A review. Patient Educ Couns.2002;48:177–187.
3.
TattersallR. The expert patient: A new approach to chronic disease management for the 21st century. Clin Med.2002; 2:227–229.
GordonEJ. Can focusing on self-care reduce disparities in kidney transplantation outcomes?Am J Kidney Dis.2005;45: 935–940.
6.
LissonGLRodrigueJRReedAINelsonDR. A brief psychological intervention to improve adherence following transplantation. Ann Transplant.2007;10:52–57.
7.
MekechukJ. A review of adherence studies in kidney transplanted adolescents. Int J Health Care Qual Assur.2004;17:i–vi.
8.
DiMatteoMRHaskardKBWilliamsSL. Health beliefs, disease severity, and patient adherence; a meta-analysis. Med Care.2007; 45:521–528.
9.
KripalaniSYaoXHaynesB. Interventions to enhance medication adherence in chronic medical conditions. Arch Intern Med.2007;167:540–550.
10.
GlanvilleAREstenneM. Indications, patient selection and timing of referral for lung transplantation. Eur Respir J.2003;22:845–852.
11.
DobbelsFVerledenGDupontL. To transplant or not? The importance of psychosocial and behavioural factors before lung transplantation. Chronic Respir Dis.2006;3:39–47.
12.
LorigKRRitterPLLaurentDDPlantK. Internet-based chronic disease self-management. Med Care.2006;44:964–971.
13.
TaylorDBuryM. Chronic illness, expert patients and care transition. Soc Health Illness.2007;29:27–45.
14.
NewbouldMTaylorDBuryM. Lay-led self-management in chronic illness: A review of the evidence. Chronic Illness.2006;2:249–261.
15.
BlackstockFWebsterKE. Disease-specific health education for COPD: A systematic review of changes in health outcomes. Health Educ Res.2007;22:703–717.
16.
Lau-WalkerM. Importance of illness beliefs and self-efficacy for patients with coronary heart disease. J Adv Nurs.2007;60:187–198.
17.
LaceyH. Values and Objectivity in Science.Lanham, MD: Lexington Books; 2007.
18.
Healthy People 2010: US Department of Health and Human Services.Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2000.
19.
MooreRRavindranVBaboolalK. The burden of new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation. Clin Transplant.2006; 20:755–761.
20.
AlbertNMZellerRA. Development and testing of the Survey of Illness Beliefs in Heart Failure tool. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs.2007;22(2):63–71.
21.
ButlerJAPevelerRCRoderickP. Modifiable risk factors for non-adherence to immunosuppressants in renal transplant recipients: A cross-sectional study. Nephrol Dialysis Transplant.2004;19(12):3144–3149.
22.
PinnockHSlackRPagliariCPriceDSheikhA. Understanding the potential role of mobile phone-based monitoring on asthma self-management: A qualitative study. Clin Exp Allergy.2007;376:794–802.
23.
FunnellMMTangTSAndersonRM. From DSME to DSMSL: Developing empowerment-based diabetes self-management support. Diabetes Spectrum.2007;20:221–226.
24.
GremigniPBacchiFTurriniC. Psychological factors associated with medication adherence following renal transplantation. Clin Transplant.2007;21:710–715.
25.
BuetowS. High need patients receiving targeted entitlements: What responsibilities do they have in primary health care?J Med Ethics.2005;31:304–306.
26.
Paasche-OrlowMKWolfMS. The causal pathways linking health literacy to health outcomes. Am J Health Behav.2007; 31(suppl 1):S19–S26.
27.
OxmanADSchunemannHJFretheimA. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: Incorporating considerations of equity. Health Res Policy Syst.2006;4:24.
28.
QaseemAVijanSSnowVCrossJTWeissKBOwensDK; Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee of the American College of Physicians. Glycemic control and type 2 diabetes mellitus: The optimal hemoglobic A1c targets. A guidance statement from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med.2007;147:417–422.
29.
MontoriVMGandhiGYGuyattGH. Patient-important outcomes in diabetes—time for consensus. Lancet.2007;370:1104–1106.
30.
GrangerBBMoserDHarrellJSandelowskiMEkmanI. A practical use of theory to study adherence. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs.2007;22:152–158.
31.
VeatchRM. Transplantation Ethics.Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2007.
