The shortage of organs for transplantation has led public health authorities to invest significant efforts in the promotion of organ donation.
Objective
To identify factors predictive of signed consent for posthumous organ donation by using the theory of planned behavior.
Participants and Design
A random sample of 602 adults completed a questionnaire at baseline, and behavior was self-reported 15 months later.
Results
Logistic regression indicated that intention, perceived behavioral control, moral norm, and past behavior were factors predictive of consent for posthumous organ donation. Participants' perceived behavioral control, past behavior, and moral norm were also predictive of intention to sign, but attitude and perceived barriers were 2 additional determinants. Finally, anticipated regret and knowledge of persons who had made an organ donation were 2 moderators of the intention-behavior relationship.
Conclusion
Overall, the results showed that intention is an important determinant of signing the organ donor's consent sticker and also highlighted that moral consideration and perceived difficulties could be 2 potential avenues for designing interventions.
SimKHMarinovALevyGA. Xenotransplantation: A potential solution to the critical organ donor shortage. Can J Gastroenterol.1999;13(4):311–318.
3.
RosnerFHenryJBWolpawJR. Ethical and social issues in organ procurement for transplantation. N Y State J Med.1993;93(1):30–34.
4.
KitturDSHoganMMThukralVKMcGawLJAlexanderJW. Incentives for organ donation? The United Network for Organ Sharing Ad Hoc Donations Committee. Lancet.1991;338(8780):1441–1443.
5.
Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs; American Medical Association.Ethical issues in managed care. JAMA.1995;273(4):330–335.
6.
DossetorJBManickavelV. Ethics in organ donation: Contrasts in two cultures. Transplant Proc.1991;23(5):2508–2511.
7.
KeyserlingkEW. Human dignity and donor altruism—are they compatible with efficiency in cadaveric human organ procurement?Transplant Proc.1990;22(3):1005–1006.
8.
RadeckiCMJaccardJ. Psychological aspects of organ donation: A critical review and synthesis of individual and next-of-kin donation decisions. Health Psychol.1997;16(2):183–195.
9.
BartholemewLParcelGKokGGottliebN. Planning Health Promotion Programs: An Intervention Mapping Approach.2nd ed.Etobicoke, Ontario: John Wiley & Sons Canada Ltd; 2006.
10.
BanduraA. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev.1977;84(2):191–215.
11.
BrugJVan VugtMVan Den BorneBBrouwersAVan HooffH. Predictors of willingness to register as an organ donor among Dutch adolescents. Psychol Health.2000;15(3):357–368.
12.
ReubsaetABrugJvan den BorneBvan HooffH. Predictors of organ donation registration among Dutch adolescents. Transplantation.2001;72(1):51–56.
13.
AjzenI. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process.1991;50:179–211.
14.
HubnerGKaiserF. The Moderating Role of the Attitude-Subjective Norms Conflict on the Link Between Moral Norms and Intention. Eur Psychol.2006;11(2):99–109.
15.
AshkenaziTMinieroGHornikJ. Exploring the intentional gap between signing an organ donor card and actual behavior: Comparing the Jewish State and Christian Italy. J Int Consum Mark.2006;18(4):101–121.
16.
SheeranP. Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. Eur Rev Soc Psychol.2002;12:1–36.
17.
FergusonEBibbyPA. Predicting future blood donor returns: Past behavior, intentions, and observer effects. Health Psychol.2002;21(5):513–518.
18.
GodinGConnerMSheeranP. Bridging the intention–behaviour ‘gap’: The role of moral norm. Br J Soc Psychol.2005;44(4):497–512.
19.
SheeranPOrbellS. Do intentions predict condom use? Meta-analysis and examination of six moderator variables. Br J Soc Psychol.1998;37:231–250.
20.
GodinGGagnéCSheeranP. Does perceived behavioural control mediate the relationship between power beliefs and intention?Br J Health Psychol.2004;9(4):557–568.
21.
TriandisHC. Values, attitudes and interpersonal behavior. In: PageMM, ed. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Beliefs, Attitudes and Values.Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press; 1980:195–259.
22.
Van der PligtJDe VriesNk. Expectancy-value models of health behaviour: The role of salience and anticipated affect. Psychol Health.1998;13:289–305.
23.
BlondeauDGodinGGagnéCMartineauI. Do ethical principles explain moral norm? a test for consent to organ donation. J Appl Biobeh Res.2004;9(4):230–243.
24.
BeauchampTChildressJ. Principles of Biomedical Ethics.5th ed.NY: Oxford University Press; 2001.
25.
FishbeinMAjzenI. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory of Research.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1975.
26.
AjzenIFishbeinM. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior.1st ed.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1980.
27.
GodinGKokG. The theory of planned behavior: A review of its applications to health-related behaviors. Am J Health Promot.1996;11(2):87–98.
BaronRMKennyDA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol.1986;51(6):1173–1182.
31.
ArmitageCJConnerM. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol.2001;40(4):471–479.
32.
TrafimowDSheeranPConnerMFinlayK. Evidence that perceived behavioural control is a multidimensional construct: Perceived control and perceived difficulty. Br J Soc Psychol.2002;41(1):101–121.
33.
AjzenI. Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol.2002;32(4):665–684.
34.
MansteadASRTerryDJHoggMA. The Role of Moral Norm in the Attitude-Behavior Relation.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000:11–30.
35.
BeckLAjzenI. Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior. J Res Pers.1991;25:285–301.
36.
GodinGGagnonHLambertLD. Factors associated with maintenance of regular condom use among single heterosexual adults: A longitudinal study. Can J Pub Health.2003;94(4):287–291.
37.
SchwartzSHBerkowitzL. Normative Influences on Altruism.New York, NY: Academic Press; 1977:221–279.
38.
CharngH-WPiliavinJACalleroP. Role identity and reasoned action in the prediction of repeated behavior. Soc Psychol Q.1988;51(4):303–317.
39.
ArmitageCJConnerM. Social cognitive determinants of blood donation. J Appl Soc Psychol.2001;31(7):1431–1457.
40.
OuelletteJAWoodW. Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychol Bull.1998;124(1):54–74.
41.
ReubsaetABrugJKitslaarJvan HooffJPvan den BorneHW. The impact and evaluation of two school-based interventions on intention to register an organ donation preference. Health Educ Res.2004;19(4):447–456.
42.
ReubsaetABrugJNijkampMDCandelMJvan HooffJPvan den BorneHW. The impact of an organ donation registration information program for high school students in the Netherlands. Soc Sci Med.2005;60(7):1479–1486.
43.
SmitsMvan den BorneBDijkerAJRyckmanRM. Increasing Dutch adolescents' willingness to register their organ donation preference: The effectiveness of an education programme delivered by kidney transplantation patients. Eur J Public Health.2006;16(1):106–110.
44.
HortonRLHortonPJ. A model of willingness to become a potential organ donor. Soc Sci Med.1991;33(9):1037–1051.
45.
BirkimerJCBarbeeAPFrancisMLBerryMMDeuserPSPopeJR. Effects of refutational messages, thought provocation, and decision deadlines on signing to donate organs. J Appl Soc Psychol.1994;24(19):1735–1761.
46.
ConnerMSandbergTMcMillanBHigginsA. Role of anticipated regret, intentions and intention stability in adolescent smoking initiation. Br J Health Psychol.2006;11(pt 1):85–101.
47.
QuinnMTAlexanderGCHollingsworthDO'ConnorKGMeltzerD. Design and evaluation of a workplace intervention to promote organ donation. Prog Transplant.2006;16(3):253–259.
