Relationships between Sex,Race,and Social Class and Social Support Networks in Kidney,Liver,and Pancreas Transplant Recipients

Abstract

Context

The contribution of social support networks to the recovery of transplant recipients is an important assessment in measuring improved physical and psychosocial well-being. Social support networks are described by structure, type, and function.

Objectives

(1) To describe the levels of structure (size, formal and informal support), type (concrete, emotional, and informational), and function (criticalness, direction, closeness, frequency, and duration) of the social support network and (2) to examine the relationships between individual characteristics of sex, race, and social class and social support networks.

Methods

This exploratory-descriptive study was done in a Mid-south transplant center. A total of 258 kidney, liver, and pancreas transplant recipients participated, 61% of whom were less than 50 years old. Instruments included a demographic questionnaire, the social support network pie chart, and the social support network grid. Descriptive statistics and analysis of variance were used with a .05 significance level.

Results

The social support network comprised extended family (67%), with a mean of 13.68 members. Emotional support was the most prevalent type of support reported. The mean (SD) duration of support was 7.9 (4.9) years. Sex, race, and social class had no main relationships with structure and type of support. However, women had a main effect with closeness (F=4.98, P<.03) and African Americans had significantly higher levels of frequency of support (F=7.51, P<.01) and longer duration of support (F=9.07, P< .01) than did whites. Social and nursing intervention may improve the network closeness in males and may also augment support frequency and duration for whites.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hathaway

Winsett

Johnson

. Post kidney transplant quality of life prediction models. Clin Transplant. 1998;12:168–174.

Wicks

Milstead

Hathaway

Cetingok

. Subjective burden and quality of life in family caregivers of patients with end stage renal disease. ANNA. 1997;24(5):527–538.

Wicks

Milstead

Hathaway

Cetingok

. Family caregivers' burden, quality of life, and health following patients' renal transplantation. J Transplant Coord. 1998;8(3):170–176.

Cetingok

Winsett

Lewis

Martin

Hathaway

. Social support variables and the quality of life of transplant recipients. Paper presented at: 16th Annual Conference of the Society for Transplant Social Workers; November 6, 2001;Santa Fe, NM.

Williams

Dilworth-Anderson

. Systems of social support in families who care for dependent African-American elders. Gerontologist. 2002;42(2):224–236.

Whittaker

Garbarino

. Social Support Networks: Informal Helping in the Human Services. New York, NY: Aldine Publishing; 1983.

Plaisier

de Bruijn

de Graaf

ten Have

Beekman

Penninx

. The contribution of working conditions and social support to the onset of depressive and anxiety disorder among male and female employees. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:401–410.

Randolph

Pinkerton

Somlai

. Severely mentally ill women's HIV risk: The influence of social support, substance use and contextual risk factors. Community Ment Health J. 2007;43:33–47.

Woodgate

Brawley

Shields

. Social support in cardiac rehabilitation exercise maintenance: Associations with self-efficacy and health-related quality of life. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2007;37:1041–1059.

10.

Heller

Swindle

. Social networks, perceived social support and coping with stress. In: Felner

Jason

Morisugu

Farber

, eds. Preventive Psychology: Theory, Research and Practice. New York, NY: Pergamon; 1983:87–103.

11.

Schilling

II . Limitations of social support. Soc Serv Rev. 1987;61:19–31.

12.

Biegel

Tracy

Corvo

. Strengthening social networks: Intervention strategies for mental health case managers. Health Soc Work. 1994;19(3):206–216.

13.

Tracy

Whittaker

. The social network map: Assessing social support in clinical practice. J Contemp Human Serv. 1990;71(8):461–470.

14.

Tracy

Abell

. Social network map: Some further refinements on administration. Soc Work Res. 1994;18(1):56–60.

15.

Tracy

Whittaker

Pugh

Kapp

Overstreet

. Support networks of primary caregivers receiving family preservation services: An exploratory study. J Contemp Human Serv. 1994;75(8):481–489.

16.

Tracy

Catalano

Whittaker

Fine

. Reliability of social network data. Soc Work Res Abstracts. 1990;June:33–35.

17.

Lewis

Winsett

Cetingok

Martin

Hathaway

. Social network mapping with transplant recipients. Prog Transplant. 2000;10(4):262–266.

18.

Hochhausen

Almaier

McQuellon

. Social support, optimism, and self-efficacy predict physical and emotional well-being after bone marrow transplantation. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2007;25:87–101.

19.

Rosenberger

van Dijk

Nagyova

. Predictors of perceived health status in patients after kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 2006;81:1306–1310.

20.

Shah

Ananth

Sohal

. Quality of life and psychosocial factors in renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2006;38(5):1283–1285.

21.

Paris

Hutkin-Slade

Calhoun-Wilson

Slentz

Oehlert

. Social work services on an organ transplantation program: A preliminary cost-benefit analysis. Res Soc Work Pract. 1999;9(2):201–212.

22.

Zilberfein

Hutson

Snyder

Epstein

. Social work practice with pre- and post-liver transplant patients: A retrospective self study. Soc Work Health Care. 2001;33(3/4):91–104.

23.

Griffin

Amodeo

Clay

. Racial differencesinsocial support: Kin versus friends. Am J Orthopsychiat. 2006;76:374–380.

24.

Tracy

. Identifying social support resources of at-risk families. Soc Work. 1990;35(3):252–258.

25.

Krause

. Longitudinal study of social support and meaning of life. Psychol Aging. 2007;22:456–469.

26.

The Organ Procurement and Transplant Network. OPTN/SRTR Annual Report. http://www.ustransplant.org/annual_reports/archives/2004/default.htm. Accessed February 23, 2008.

27.

SAS/STAT User's Guide [computer program]. Version 6. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1989.

28.

Asian American Action Fund. Annual Census Report. http://www.aaa-fund.org/aspdata/statedata.asp?state=tennessee. Accessed February 23, 2008.

29.

Mendoza

. Latinos in Memphis and in Tennessee. http://www.nlpoa.org/Latino_Immigrants_in_Memphis_Tennessee_Their_Local_Impact_NLPOA.pdf. Accessed February 23, 2008.

30.

Dew

Kormos

DiMartini

. Prevalence and risk of depression and anxiety-related disorders during the first three years after heart transplantation. Psychosomatics. 2001;42(4):300–313.

31.

Kaye

Applegate

. Family support groups for male caregivers: Benefits of participation. J Gerontological Soc Work. 1993;20:167–185.

32.

Denhaerynck

Dobbels

Cleemput

. Prevalence consequences, and determinants of nonadherence in adult renal transplant patients: A literature review. Transplant Int. 2005;18(10):1121–1133.

33.

Russell

. Medication noncompliance: Perceptions of transplant health care providers. Dial Transplant. 2005;34(5):301–303.

34.

Russell

Kilburn

Conn

Libbus

Ashbaugh

. Medication-taking beliefs of adult renal transplant recipients. Clin Nurse Spec. 2003;17(4):200–208.

35.

Lincoln

. Social support, negative interactions, and psychological well-being. Soc Serv Rev. 2000;74:231–252.

36.

Heinonen

Volin

Uutela

Zevon

Barrick

Rutuu

. Gender-associated differences in the quality of life after allogeneic BMT. Bone Marrow Transplantation. 2001;28(5):503–509.

37.

Jackson

. Relationship between perceived close social support and health practices within community samples of American women and men. J Psychol. 2006;140(3):229–246.

38.

Russell

. Culturally responsive interventions to enhance immunosuppressive medication adherence in older African American renal transplant recipients. Prog Transplant. 2006;16:187–196.

39.

Locher

Ritchie

Roth

Baker

Bodner

Allman

. Social isolation, support, and capital and nutritional risk in an older sample: Ethnic and gender differences. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60(4):747–761.