ZinkS. A presumptive approach to organ donation. Presented at: Organ Donation Breakthrough Collaborative, Learning Session 4/1; September 12–14, 2004;San Diego, CA.
5.
Health Resources and Services Administration, Organ Donation Breakthrough Collaborative, Action Period 1 results.PowerPoint presentation, Dallas, TX. Available at: http://organdonationnow.org. Accessed March 1, 2005.
6.
US Department of Health and Human Services.The Organ Donation Breakthrough Collaborative: Best Practices Final Report.Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Office of Special Programs, Division of Transplantation; September 2003.
7.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.Health Care at the Crossroads: Strategies for Narrowing the Organ Donation Gap and Protecting Patients [brochure].Oakbrook, IL: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations; 2004.
8.
GortmakerSLBeasleyCLBrighamLE. Organ donor potential and performance: Size and nature of the organ donor shortfall. Crit Care Med.1996;24:432–439.
9.
Medicare and Medicaid: Hospital conditions of participation—identification of potential organ, tissue, and eye donors and transplant hospitals' provision of transplant-related data. 63 Federal Register33856 (1998) (codified at 42 CFR §482).
10.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.Conditions of participation: Conditions of coverage—identification of potential organ, tissue, and eye donors: Questions and answers, 2004. Available at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/cop/2a2.asp. Accessed April 5, 2005.
BoothCMBooneRHTomilinsonGDetskyAS. Is this patient dead, vegetative, or severely neurologically impaired: Assessing outcome for comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. JAMA.2004;291:870–879.
13.
RosenDSMacdonaldRL. Subarachnoid hemorrhage grading scales: A systematic review. Neurocrit Care.2005;2:110–118.
14.
SiccardiDCavaliereRPauA. Penetrating craniocerebral missile injuries in civilians: A retrospective analysis of 314 cases. Surg Neurol.1991;35:455–460.
15.
PolinRShaffreyMPhillipsC. Multivariate analysis and prediction of outcome following penetrating head injury. Neurosurg Clin North Am.1995;6:689–699.
16.
SeldenBGoodmanJCordellW. Outcome of self-inflicted gunshot wounds of the brain. Ann Emerg Med.1988;17:247–253.
17.
Brain Trauma Foundation, American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Part 2: Early Indicators of Prognosis in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.New York, NY: Brain Trauma Foundation Inc; 2000.
18.
BatesD. The prognosis of medical coma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry.2001;71:20–23.
19.
LiebermanJDPasqualeMDGarciaRCipolleMDLiMPWasserTE. Use of admission Glasgow coma score, pupil size, and pupil reactivity to determine outcome for trauma patients. J Trauma.2003;55:437–443.
20.
WinterRCohenS. ABC of intensive care: Withdrawal of treatment. BMJ.1999;319:306–308.
21.
MayerSAKossoffSB. Withdrawal of life support in the neurological intensive care unit [abstract]. Neurology.1999;52:1602.
22.
Health Resources and Services Administration, Organ Donation Breakthrough Collaborative, National Learning Congress.PowerPoint presentation, Pittsburgh, PA. Available at: http://organdonationnow.org. Accessed July 1, 2005.
23.
NovitzkyD. Physiologic consequences of brain death. In: KlintmalmGBLevyMF, eds. Organ Procurement and PreservationAustin, TX: Landes Bioscience; 1999:31–46.
24.
LewisDDValeriusW. Organs from non-heart-beating donors: An answer to the organ shortage. Crit Care Nurse. April 1999;19:70–74.
25.
RodrigueJRCornellDLJacksonSIKanaskyWMarhefkaSReedAI. Are organ donation attitudes and beliefs, empathy, and life orientation related to donor registration status?Prog Transplant.2004;14:56–60.
26.
US Department of Health and Human Services.Medicare Conditions of Participation for Organ Donation: An Early Assessment of the New Donation Rule.Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General, Office of Evaluation and Inspections; August 2000.
27.
Health Resources and Services Administration, Organ Donation Breakthrough Collaborative, National Learning Congress.Maximizing the effectiveness of team huddles. PowerPoint presentation, Pittsburgh, PA. Available at: http://organdonationnow.org. Accessed July 1, 2005.
28.
ZavalaEYGabtielA. Public attitudes and beliefs toward organ donation and transplantation: Focus on American ethnicity. J Transpl Coord.1994;4:31–37.
29.
VerbleJWorthM. Communication with families and consent: The key to organ and tissue donation. Presented at: Workshop; August 1996;Fort Worth, TX.
30.
GanikosM. Health Resources and Services Administration, Organ Donation Breakthrough Collaborative, Learning Session 2. Presumptive approach. PowerPoint presentation, Dallas, TX. Available at: http://organdonationnow.org. Accessed March 1, 2005.
31.
Health Resources and Services Administration, Organ Donation Breakthrough Collaborative, Learning Session 4/1: Presumptive Approach. PowerPoint presentation, Dearborn, Mich and Pittsburgh, PA. Available at: http://organdonationnow.org. Accessed March 1, 2005.
32.
GarrisonRNBentleyFRRaqueGH. There is an answer to the shortage of organ donors. Surg Gynecol Obstet.1991;173:391–396.
33.
SiminoffLALawrenceRHZhangA. Decoupling: What is it and does it really help increase consent to organ donation?Prog Transplant.2002;12:52–60.
34.
ExleyMWhiteNMartinJH. Why families say no to organ donation. Crit Care Nurse. December 2002;22:44–51.
35.
HampeSO. Needs of the grieving spouse in a hospital setting. Nurs Res.1975;24:113–120.
36.
SiminoffLAGordonNHewlettJArnoldAM. Factors influencing families' consent for donation of solid organs for transplantation. JAMA.2001;286:71–77.