Intention to Register as Organ Donors: A Survey of Adolescents

Abstract

Background

Little is known about factors that influence the intention of adolescents to register as organ donors. The identification of such factors has important implications for the development and implementation of educational programs and subsequent donor registration rates.

Objective

To determine whether adolescents with an expressed commitment to becoming organ donor registrants differ significantly from nondonors on sociodemographic characteristics and factors influencing their decision.

Participants

Four hundred forty-five adolescents visiting a Department of Motor Vehicles office for a permit or license (n = 153) or attending a driver's education course (n = 292) completed a semistructured interview and questionnaire.

Results

Female (52.6%) and white (55.8%) adolescents were more likely to have favorable donation intentions relative to male (45.6%) and nonwhite (39.0%) adolescents (χ² = 7.5, P = .02, and χ² = 19.7, P = .003, respectively). Those with favorable donation intentions also endorsed significantly more positive factors (benevolence, need awareness, existentialism) as being more important in their decision. Adolescents who did not want to donate (58.7%) and those who were undecided (23.1%) were less likely to have discussed their decision with parents than were those who wanted to donate (67.7%, χ² = 63.6, P = .0001). Finally, providing adolescents with a free driver's license in exchange for organ donor registration would have the greatest impact on registering undecided adolescents (29.8%, χ² = 33.2, P = .0001).

Conclusions

There is a pressing need for more systematic and culturally sensitive organ donation education directed toward adolescents, and the Department of Motor Vehicles and driver's education courses may be appropriate venues. An educational program from the US Department of Health and Human Services, Decision: Donation, could be used in this context.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Delmonico

Sheehy

Marks

Baliga

McGowan

Magee

. Organ donation and utilization in the United States, 2004. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:862–873.

Sheehy

Conrad

Brigham

. Estimating the number of potential organ donors in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:667–674.

Cantarovich

. The role of education in increasing organ donation. Ann Transplant. 2004;9(1):39–42.

US Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration . Decision: Donation. Available at: http://www.organdonor.gov/student. Accessed December 3, 2005.

Sirois

Sears

Jr Marhefka

. Do new drivers equal new donors? An examination of factors influencing organ donation attitudes and behaviors in adolescents. J Behav Med. 2005;28:201–212.

Reubsaet

van den Borne

Brug

Pruyn

van Hooff

. Determinants of the intention of Dutch adolescents to register as organ donors. Soc Sci Med. 2001;53:383–392.

Weaver

Spigner

Pineda

Rabun

Allen

. Knowledge and opinions about organ donation among urban high school students: Pilot test of a health education program. Clin Transplant. 2000;14:292–303.

Wilson

Rodrigue

Taylor

, eds. Health-Promoting and Health-Compromising Behaviors Among Minority Adolescents. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1997.

Anantachoti

Gross

Gunderson

. Promoting organ donation among high school students: An educational intervention. Prog Transplant. 2001;11:201–207.

10.

Reubsaet

Brug

Kitslaar

van Hooff

van den Borne

. The impact and evaluation of two school-based interventions on intention to register an organ donation preference. Health Educ Res. 2004;19:447–456.

11.

Spigner

Weaver

Cardenas

Allen

. Organ donation and transplantation: Ethnic differences in knowledge and opinions among urban high school students. Ethn Health. 2002;7(2):87–101.

12.

Waldrop

Tamburlin

Thompson

Simon

. Life and death decisions: Using school-based health education to facilitate family discussion about organ and tissue donation. Death Stud. 2004;28:643–657.

13.

Radecki

Jaccard

. Psychological aspects of organ donation: A critical review and synthesis of individual and next-of-kin donation decisions. Health Psychol. 1997;16:183–195.

14.

Rodrigue

Cornell

Jackson

Kanasky

Marhefka

Reed

. Are organ donation attitudes and beliefs, empathy, and life orientation related to donor registration status? Prog Transplant. 2004;14:56–60.

15.

Godin

Kok

. The theory of planned behavior: A review of its applications to health-related behaviors. Am J Health Promot. November-December 1996;11:87–98.

16.

Siegel

Alvaro

Jones

. Organ donor registration preferences among Hispanic populations: Which modes of registration have the greatest promise? Health Educ Behav. 2005;32:242–252.

17.

US Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Office of Special Programs, Division of Transplantation . Guidelines for Donor Registry Development Conference: Final Report, 2nd revision, 2002. Available at: http://www.organdonor.gov/nfdrguidelines.html#2wg3. Accessed October 31, 2005.

18.

Rayburn

. A multipronged approach to addressing the organ shortage. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2005;20(suppl):S14–S21.

19.

Smits

van den Borne

Dijker

Ryckman

. Increasing Dutch adolescents' willingness to register their organ donation preference: The effectiveness of an education programme delivered by kidney transplantation patients. Eur J Public Health. 2006;16:106–110.

20.

Radecki

Jaccard

. Psychological aspects of organ donation: A critical review and synthesis of individual and next-of-kin donation decisions. Health Psychol. 1997;16:183–195.

21.

Alvaro

Jones

Robles

Siegel

. Predictors of organ donation behavior among Hispanic Americans. Prog Transplant. 2005;15:149–156.

22.

Callender

Hall

Branch

. An assessment of the effectiveness of the Mottep model for increasing donation rates and preventing the need for transplantation—adult findings: Program years 1998 and 1999. Semin Nephrol. 2001;21:419–428.

23.

Siminoff

Lawrence

. Knowing patients' preferences about organ donation: Does it make a difference? J Trauma. 2002;53:754–760.

24.

Rodrigue

Cornell

Howard

. The organ donation decision: A comparison of donor and non-donor families. Am J Transplant. 2006;6:190–198.

25.

Rodrigue

Scott

Oppenheim

. The tissue donation experience: A comparison of donor and nondonor families. Prog Transplant. 2003;13:258–264.

26.

Tandon

Verma

Vanathi

Pandey

Vajpayee

. Factors affecting eye donation from postmortem cases in a tertiary care hospital. Cornea. 2004;23:597–601.

27.

Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs . Financial incentives for organ procurement. Ethical aspects of future contracts for cadaveric donors. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association. Arch Intern Med. 1995; 155:581–589.

28.

Rodrigue

Cornell

Howard

. Attitudes toward financial incentives, donor authorization, and presumed consent among next-of-kin who consented vs. refused organ donation. Transplantation. 2006;81:1249–1256.