Despite the advantages of living donor transplantation, evidence suggests that some potential recipients with living donors have psychological concerns that prevent them from pursuing living donation. Addressing these concerns through education may increase the rates of living donation.
Objective
To understand the psychological barriers and educational needs of potential kidney recipients regarding living donation.
Subjects and Design
Qualitative focus group study of kidney transplant recipients, donors, and family members to explore their assessment of the advantages of dialysis and deceased donor transplantation over living donation, their concerns about living donation, and what types of living donation education would be most helpful.
Results
Kidney recipients reported that they might not pursue living donation because they felt guilty and indebted to the donor, did not want to harm or inconvenience the donor, did not want to accept a kidney that a family member might need later, and did not want to disappoint the donor if the kidney failed. Recipients were generally unaware that donors could personally benefit from donating and would rather wait for donor volunteers than ask anyone directly. Both donors and recipients thought that training on how to make the donation request and education about living donors' motivations for donation and transplant experience could help more renal patients pursue living donation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
USRDS. USRDS 2004 Annual Data Report: Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States.Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2004.
2.
XueJLMaJZLouisTACollinsAJ. Forecast of the number of patients with end-stage renal disease in the United States to the year 2010. J Am Soc Nephrol.2001;12:2753–2758.
3.
HeiweSClyneNDahlgrenMA. Living with chronic renal failure: Patients' experiences of their physical and functional capacity. Physiother Res Int.2003;8:167–177.
4.
WolfeRAAshbyVBMilfordEL. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med.1999;341:1725–1730.
5.
UNOS. United Network for Organ Sharing Web site. Available at: http://www.unos.org. Accessed April 25, 2005.
6.
SmithCRWoodwardRSCohenDS. Cadaveric versus living donor kidney transplantation: A Medicare payment analysis. Transplantation.2000;69:311–314.
7.
TarantinoA. Why should we implement living donation in renal transplantation?Clin Nephrol. April 2000;5:55–63.
8.
UNOS. Living Donation: An overview. Available at: http://www.unos.org. Accessed April 20, 2005
9.
CeckaJMTerasakiPI. Living donor kidney transplants: Superior success rates despite histoincompatibilities. Transplant Proc.1997;29:203.
10.
PradelFGMullinsCDBartlettST. Exploring donors' and recipients' attitudes about living donor kidney transplantation. Prog Transplant.2003;13:203–210.
11.
CabrerCOppenhaimerFManyalichM. The living kidney donation process: The donor perspective. Transplant Proc.2003;35:1631–1632.
12.
SmithMDKappellDFProvinceMA. Living-related kidney donors: A multicenter study of donor education, socioeconomic adjustment, and rehabilitation. Am J Kidney Dis.1986;8:223–233.
13.
SchweitzerJSeidel-WieselMVerresRWieselM. Psychological consultation before living kidney donation: Finding out and handling problem cases. Transplantation.2003;76:1464–1470.
14.
GordonEJ. “They don't have to suffer for me”: Why dialysis patients refuse offers of living donor kidneys. Med Anthropol Q.2001;15:245–267.
15.
SannerMA. Transplant recipients' conceptions of three key phenomena in transplantation: The organ donation, the organ donor, and the organ transplant. Clin Transplant.2003;17:391–400.
16.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Organ donations increase when families have good information about the donation process. Available at http://www.ahrq.gov/research/jul01/701RA2.htm#head2. Accessed April 4, 2005.
17.
BartlettSTFarneyACJarrellBE. Kidney transplantation at the University of Maryland. Clin Transpl.1998:177–185.
18.
SchweitzerEJYoonSHartJ. Increased living donor volunteer rates with a formal recipient family education program. Am J Kidney Dis.1997;29:739–745.
19.
RodrigueJCornellDHowardRJKaplanBLinJ. Randomized evaluation of a home-based education program to increase living kidney donation. Paper presented at: American Transplant Congress; May 21–25, 2005; Seattle, Wash.
20.
MorganDL. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research.Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, Inc; 1988.
21.
AsburyJ. Overview of focus group research. Qual Health Res.1995;5:414–420.
22.
BaschCE. Focus group interview: An underutilized research technique for improving theory and practice in health education. Health Educ Q.1987;14:411–448.
CallenderCBurstonBYeagerCMilesP. A national minority transplant program for increasing donation rates. Transplant Proc.1997;29:1482–1483.
25.
GallagherTWatermanAEbersAFraserVLevinsonW. Patients' and physicians' attitudes regarding the disclosure of medical errors. JAMA.2003;289:1001–1007.
26.
SchweitzerEJWilsonJJacobsS. Increased rates of donation with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg.2000;232:392–400.
27.
ShafizadehSMcEvoyJRMurrayC. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: Impact on an established renal transplant program. Am Surg.2000;66:1132–1135.
28.
HsuTHSuLMRatnerLEJarrettTWKavoussiLR. Demographics of 353 laparoscopic renal donor and recipient pairs at the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions. J Endourol.2003;17:393–396.
29.
ShenoySLowellJARamachandranVJendrisakM. The ideal living donor nephrectomy “mini-nephrectomy” through a posterior transcostal approach. J Am Coll Surg.2002;194:240–246.
30.
BurroughsTEWatermanADHongBA. One organ donation, three perspectives: Experiences of donors, recipients, and third parties with living kidney donation. Prog Transplant.2003;13:142–150.
31.
JohnsonEMNajarianJSMatasAJ. Living kidney donation: Donor risks and quality of life. Clin Transpl.1997:231–240.
32.
VerbleMWorthJ. Overcoming families' fears and concerns in the donation discussion. Prog Transplant.2000;10:155–160.
33.
PradelFGLimcangcoMRMullinsCDBartlettST. Patients' attitudes about living donor transplantation and living donor nephrectomy. Am J Kidney Dis.2003;41:849–858.
34.
Fehrman-EkholmIBrinkBEricssonCElinderCGDunerFLundgrenG. Kidney donors don't regret: Follow-up of 370 donors in Stockholm since 1964. Transplantation.2000;69:2067–2071.
35.
CorleyMCElswickRKSargeantCCScottS. Attitude, self-image, and quality of life of living kidney donors. Nephrol Nurs J.2000;27:43–50.
36.
ToronyiEAlfoldyFJarayJ. Attitudes of donors towards organ transplantation in living related kidney transplantations. Transpl Int.1998;11(suppl 1):S481–483.
37.
GordonEJ. Patients' decisions for treatment of end-stage renal disease and their implications for access to transplantation. Soc Sci Med.2001;53:971–987.
38.
OtaK. Kidney transplantation using living donors in Japan: How the donors feel. Clin Transpl.1994:369–371.
39.
Jakubowska-WineckaA. Psychological rules of communication with relatives of a potential organ donor—the Polish experience. Ann Transplant.1998;3(1):42–45.
40.
RandhawaG. Specialist nurse training programme: Dealing with asking for organ donation. J Adv Nurs.1998;28:405–408.
41.
AlexanderGCSehgalAR. Why hemodialysis patients fail to complete the transplantation process. Am J Kidney Dis.2001;37:321–328.
