Role of the Independent Donor Advocacy Team in Ethical Decision Making

Abstract

Adult living donor liver transplantation has developed as a direct result of the critical shortage of deceased donors. Recent regulations passed by New York State require transplant programs to appoint an Independent Donor Advocacy Team to evaluate, educate, and consent to all potential living liver donors. Ethical issues surround the composition of the team, who appoints them, and the role the team plays in the process. Critics of living liver donation have questioned issues surrounding motivation and the ability of donors to provide true informed consent during a time of family crisis. This article will address issues surrounding the controversies and discuss how using the team can effectively evaluate and educate potential living liver donors and improve practice to ensure safety of living donors.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

United Network for Organ Sharing Organ Donation and Transplantation . Available at: http://www.unos.org. Accessed April 21, 2004.

Brown

Jr Russo

Lai

. A survey of liver transplant from living adult donors in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:818–825.

Russo

Rudow

Kinkhabwala

Emond

Brown

Jr . Impact of adult living donor liver transplantation on waiting time survival in candidates listed for liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2004;4:427–431.

New York State Committee on Quality Improvement in Living Liver Donation . A report to New York State Transplant Council and New York State Department of Health. Available at: http://www.health.state.ny.us/nysdoh/liver_donation/index.htm. Accessed April 21, 2004.

Consensus Report: Secretary Tommy G . Thompson's Advisory Committee on Organ Transplantation (ACOT). Available at: http://www.hrsa.gov. Accessed January 2004.

Shapiro

Adams

. Ethical issues surrounding adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transplant. 2000;6:S77–S80.

Olbrisch

Benedict

Haller

Levenson

. Psychosocial assessment of living organ donors: Clinical and ethical considerations. Prog Transplant. 2001;11:40–49.

Rudow

LaPointe D

Charlton

Sanchez

Chang

Serur

Brown

Jr . Kidney and liver living donors: A comparison of experiences. Prog Transplant. 2005;15:185–191.

Eghtesad

Jain

Fung

. Living donor liver transplantation: Ethics and safety. Transplant Proc. 2003;35:51–52.

10.

Potts

. Surgery violates principles of beneficence and autonomy. BMJ. 2003;327:1287.

11.

Russo

Brown

Jr . Ethical issues in living donor liver transplantation. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2003;5:26–30.

12.

Siegler

Lantos

. Commentary: Ethical justification for living liver donation. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1992;1:320–325.

13.

Rudow

LaPointe D

Brown

Jr . Evaluation of living liver donors. Prog Transplant. 2003;13:110–116.

14.

Bulger

Heitman

Reiser

. The Ethical Dimensions of the Biological and Health Sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2002.

15.

National Institutes of Health Web site . Research Involving Individuals With Questionable Capacity to Consent: Points to Consider, March 11, 1999. Available at: http://www.nih.gov. Accessed April 4, 2004.

16.

Delmonico

Surman

. Is this live-organ donor your patient? Transplantation. 2003;76:1257–1260.

17.

Brown

Jr Rush

Rosen

. Liver and intestine transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2004;4(suppl 9):81–92.

18.

Trotter

Talamantes

McClure

. Right hepatic lobe donation for living donor liver transplantation; impact on donor quality of life. Liver Transplant. 2001;33:1386–1397.

19.

Diaz

Renz

Mudge

. Donor health assessment after living-donor liver transplantation. Ann Surg. July 2002;236:120–126.

20.

Beavers

Sandler

Fair

Johnson

Shrestha

. The living donor experience: Donor health assessment and outcomes after living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transplant. 2001;7:943–947.