Ethics and Regulation in Organ Procurement Research

Abstract

This article explores the role of ethics and regulation in human research conducted by organ procurement agencies; basic ethical principles for human research are outlined. Organ procurement agencies are not required to observe federal regulations; however, voluntary adherence will ensure that procurement research is conducted according to current standards of ethical practice. Although most organ procurement research will qualify for exempt status, this determination should be made by an institutional review board. Even if studies qualify for exempt status, there is a moral presumption that informed consent should be sought, unless certain narrow conditions for waiver of consent are satisfied. Finally, when future research utilizing organ procurement records is anticipated, procurement coordinators should provide sufficiently detailed information to families about such plans to permit their advance informed consent to research activities.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Rothman

. Strangers at the Bedside: A History of How Law and Bioethics Transformed Medical Decision Making. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1991.

Jones

. Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. New York, NY: The Free Press; 1993.

46 Federal Register (1983) (codified at 45 CFR part 46).

56 Federal Register (1991) (codified at 45 CFR part 46 subpart A).

The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1978.

The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Institutional Review Boards: Report and Recommendations. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1978.

World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2000;284:3043–3045.

Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva, Switzerland: Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences; 1993.

International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice. Federal Register. 1997;62:25691–25709.

10.

56 Federal Register (1991) (codified at 45 CFR part 46.101 [b][4]).

11.

56 Federal Register (1991) (codified at 45 CFR part 46.101 [b][2]).

12.

Faden

Beauchamp

. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1986.

13.

McCarthy

Shatin

Drinkard

. Medical records and privacy: Empirical effects of legislation. HSR: Health Services Research. 1999;34(part II):417–425.

14.

Department of Health and Human Services. Final regulations amending basic HHS policy for the protection of human research subjects. Federal Register. 1981;46:8366–8391.

15.

56 Federal Register (1991) (codified at 45 CFR part 46. 116[d]).

16.

56 Federal Register (1991) (codified at 45 CFR 46.116[a]).

17.

National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Research Involving Human Biological Materials: Ethical Issues and Policy Guidance. Volume 1. Rockville, Md: National Bioethics Advisory Commission; 1999.