To understand the interdependence of couples involved in transplantation, both partners need to be included in the same study. This pilot study explored the desire for control, coping, and quality of life in heart and lung transplant candidates, recipients, and spouses, using McCubbin's Double ABCX Model as the conceptual basis. Sixty letters were mailed to randomly selected candidates and recipients at 2 transplant centers. Twenty-five couples completed a demographic sheet and the following surveys: The Desire for Control Scale, the Family Crisis Oriented Personal Evaluation Scale, and the Quality of Life Index. There were 9 pretransplant and 16 posttransplant couples. Analyses included measures of central tendency, analysis of variance, t tests, and correlations. There were statistically significant differences between pretransplant patients' quality of life and all other groups. There were moderate correlations between several patient and spouse variables. It was recommended that healthcare professionals include both patients and spouses when planning interventions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
United Network for Organ Sharing. Transplant Patient DataSource. Available at: http://www.unos.org. Accessed June 14, 2000.
2.
CroneCWiseT. Psychiatric aspects of transplantation, III: Postoperative issues. Crit Care Nurse. 1999;19(4):28–37.
3.
DuquetteSLaLondeLTraigerG. Living-donor lobar lung transplantation: A case study. Crit Care Nurse. 2000;20(1):69–80.
4.
HoffmanRReederS. Mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept): The newest immunosuppressant. Crit Care Nurse. 1998;18(3):50–65.
5.
ManzettiJAnkenyRMillerD. Psychosocial and ethical issues in surgical approaches to end-stage lung disease. Clin Chest Med. 1997;18:383–390.
6.
SmolinTAguuilarL. Psychosocial and financial aspects of lung transplantation. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 1996;8:293–303.
7.
CollinsEWhite-WilliamsCJalowiecA. Spouse stressors while awaiting heart transplantation. Heart Lung. 1996;25:4–13.
8.
ParisWBrawnerNThompsonSPenidoM. Psychosocial issues in heart transplantation: A review for transplant coordinators. J Transplant Coord. 1997;7:88–95.
9.
HwangH. Patient and family adjustment to heart transplantation. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 1996;11(2):16–18.
10.
WhiteYGrenyerB. The biospychosocial impact of end-stage renal disease: The experience of dialysis patients and their partners. J Adv Nurs. 1999;30:1312–1320.
11.
MyersJHenderson-KingDHenderson-KingE. Facing technological risks. J Res Pers. 1997;31:1–20.
12.
WallaceKBergemanC. Control and the elderly. “Goodness of fit.”Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1997;45:323–339.
13.
CroneCWiseT. Psychiatric aspects of transplantation, II: Preoperative issues. Crit Care Nurse. 1999;19(3):51–63.
14.
TahanH. Patients waiting for heart transplantation: An analysis of vulnerability. Crit Care Nurse. 1998;18(4):40–48.
15.
BurgerJ. Desire for Control. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1992.
16.
McCubbinMMcCubbinH. Families coping with illness: The Resiliency Model of family stress, adjustment and adaptation. In: DanielsonCHamel-BissellBWinstead-FryP, eds. Families, Health and Illness. New York, NY: Mosby; 1993:21–60.
17.
PorterPKroutLParksV. Perceived stress and coping strategies among cardiac transplant patients during the organ waiting period [abstract]. Heart Lung. 1992;21:292.
18.
HirthMStewartA. Hope and social support as coping resources for adults waiting for cardiac transplantation. Can J Nur Res. 1994;26(3):31–45.
19.
DewMSimmonsRRothL. Psychologocal predictors of vulnerability to distress in the year following heart transplantation. Psychol Med. 1994;24:929–945.
20.
KurzJ. The Lived Experience of Spouses of Individuals Waiting for Lung Transplantation [dissertation]. Newark, Del: University of Delaware; 1997.
21.
NolanMCupplesSBrownMPirceLLepleyDOhlerL. Perceived stress and coping strategies among families of cardiac transplant candidates during the organ waiting period. Heart Lung. 1992;21:540–547.
22.
BuseSPieperB. Impact of cardiac transplantation on the spouse's life. Heart Lung. 1990;19:641–648.
23.
MishelMMurdaughC. Family adjustment to heart transplantation: Redesigning the dream. Nurs Res. 1987;36:332–338.
24.
Saxe-BraithwaiteMChapmanJ. Life on hold: The experience of the support person involved in a lung transplant program. Can J Nurs Res. 1992;24(3):69–80.
25.
KurzJ. The roller coaster: Life of the well spouse after lung transplantation. Paper presented at: American Psychological Association Annual Convention; August 7, 2000; Washington, DC.
26.
MaguireM. Treating the dyad as the unit of analysis: A primer on three analytic approaches. J Marriage Family. 1999;61:213–223.
27.
UngerDJacobsSCannonC. Social support and marital satisfaction among couples coping with chronic obstructive airway disease. J Soc Pers Relationships. 1996;13:123–142.
28.
McCubbinHPattersonJ. The family stress process: The Double ABCX Model of Adjustment and Adaptation. Marriage Family Rev. 1983;6(1):7–35.
29.
BurgerJCooperH. The desirability of control. Motivation Emotion. 1979;3(4):381–393.
30.
McCubbinHOlsenDLarsenA. F-COPES. In: McCubbinHThompsonA, eds. Family Assessment Inventories for Research and Practice. Madison, Wis: The University of Wisconsin-Madison; 1983:203–216.
31.
FerransCPowersM. Quality of Life Index: Development and psychometric properties. Adv Nurs. 1985;8:15–24.
32.
FerransC. Development of a conceptual model of quality of life. Sch Inq Nurs Pract. 1996;10(3):293–304.
33.
StatMost: Statistical Analysis and Graphics [computer program]. Los Angeles, Calif: Dataxiom; 1994.
LimbosMChanCKestenS. Quality of life in female lung transplant candidates and recipients. Chest. 1997;112:1165–1174.
36.
GrossCSavikKBolmanRHertzM. Long-term health status and quality of life outcomes of lung transplant recipients. Chest. 1995;108:1587–1593.
37.
GradyKJaloweicAWhite-WilliamsC. Quality of life 6 months after heart transplantation compared with indicators of illness severity before transplantation. Am J Crit Care. 1998;7:106–116.
