Ambulatory Endovascular Surgery: Cost Advantage and Factors Influencing its Safe Performance

Abstract

Purpose:

To perform a retrospective analysis of chronic limb ischemia and determine whether endovascular surgery can be performed safely and cost effectively on an ambulatory basis.

Methods:

Among 42 patients undergoing endovascular interventions for lower limb ischemia over a 12-month period ending October 1997, 32 (18 men, mean age 68 years, range 44 to 89) were treated solely by endovascular interventions. These patients were grouped according to time inhospital: 20 (63%) patients had endovascular procedures performed on an ambulatory basis, 7 (22%) were hospitalized for > 24 hours, and 5 (16%) required an overnight stay. The angioplasty procedures, which included placement of 21 stents, were performed in the abdominal aorta (n = 1) and the common iliac (n = 9), external iliac (n = 7), superficial femoral (n = 11), popliteal (n = 5), tibioperoneal (n = 7), and subclavian (n = 1) arteries. Hospital charges were compared for the 3 groups.

Results:

Other than the presence of coronary artery disease, there were no significant differences in demographics or risk factors among the 3 groups. Angioplasty was technically successful in all patients, and there were no procedural complications. Patients with tissue loss required hospitalization more frequently compared to those with claudication. Significantly more patients who were hospitalized had epidural anesthesia as opposed to local when compared to the ambulatory group, 43% versus 5%, respectively (p = 0.04). Excluding professional fees, mean total hospital cost differed significantly between the ambulatory group and the group of patients with a hospital stay > 24 hours ($8227 versus $40,383, respectively; p = 0.03) and between the 2 hospitalized groups ($9476 for overnight stay versus $40,383 for > 24-hour stay, p = 0.03).

Conclusions:

Peripheral endovascular interventions can be performed safely on an ambulatory basis resulting in decreased hospital cost. Patients who receive epidural anesthesia, require concomitant open vascular reconstruction, present with tissue loss, or have unstable medical conditions are more likely to require hospitalization.

Keywords

balloon angioplasty stents outpatient procedures epidural anesthesia cost analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Rosenfield

Schainfeld

Isner

. Percutaneous revascularization in peripheral arterial disease. Curr Probl Cardiol 1996; 21: 7–93.

Criado

Queral

Patten

. Endovascular surgery in daily practice: A reappraisal. J Endovasc Surg 1994; 1: 92–99.

Ballard

Bergan

Singh

. Aortoiliac stent deployment versus surgical reconstruction: Analysis of outcome and cost. J Vasc Surg 1998; 28: 94–103.

Rutherford

Baker

Ernst

. Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: Revised version. J Vasc Surg 1997; 26: 517–538.

Diethrich

. In perspective: Endoluminal grafting, part I: What do we need to know to achieve durable endoluminal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair? Tex Heart Inst J 1997; 24: 179–184.

Manashil

Thunstron

Thorpe

. Outpatient transluminal angioplasty. Radiology 1983; 146: 7–8.

Payne

Stanton

Travers

. Outpatient angioplasty: 4-year experience in one practice. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1997; 79: 331–334.

Rieser

Ruckner

. Outpatient PTA in the treatment of arterial occlusive diseases. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1995; 162: 330–334.

Struck

Rankin

Eliasziw

. Safety of outpatient peripheral angioplasty. Radiology 1993; 189: 193–196.

10.

Rogers

Kraft

. Outpatient angioplasty. Radiology 1990; 174: 753–755.

11.

Criado

Abdul-Khoudoud

Twena

. Outpatient endovascular intervention: Is it safe? J Endovasc Surg 1998; 5: 236–239.

12.

Standards of Practice Committee of the Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology. Angioplasty standard of practice. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1992; 3: 269–271.

13.

Pentecost

Criqui

Dorros

. Guidelines for peripheral percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the abdominal aorta and lower extremity vessels. A statement for health professionals from a Special Writing Group of the Councils on Cardiovascular Radiology, Arteriosclerosis, Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Prevention, the American Heart Association. Circulation 1994; 89: 511–531.

14.

Doubilet

Abrams

. The cost of underutilization: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for peripheral vascular disease. N Engl J Med 1984; 310: 95–102.

15.

Vroegindeweij

Idu

Buth

. The cost effectiveness of treatment of short occlusive lesions in the femoropopliteal artery: Balloon angioplasty versus endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1995; 10: 40–50.