Abstract
Purpose:
Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative to conventional surgery and may offer significant advantages in respiratory function and analgesic requirements due to the absence of an abdominal incision.
Methods:
Respiratory function and analgesic requirements were quantified in 22 age-matched patients undergoing aneurysm repair under general anesthesia. Twelve patients underwent endovascular aneurysm repair, while 10 AAA patients had conventional surgery. One endovascular patient required conversion to conventional repair.
Results:
The endovascular group required postoperative artificial ventilation for a shorter time (6 versus 21 hours, p < 0.05) and had lower PCA (patient-controlled analgesia) morphine consumption (41 versus 133 mg, p < 0.05) than the conventional group. The endovascular group also had significantly better forced expiratory volume and forced vital capacity at both 3 and 5 days when expressed as percentages of the preoperative values (p < 0.05).
Conclusions:
Endovascular AAA repair attenuates respiratory dysfunction associated with conventional surgery and reduces perioperative analgesia requirements.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.