Percutaneous Carotid Access in Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair: Initial Experience

Abstract

Purpose:

Direct percutaneous access to the carotid artery (diPerCa) during endovascular aortic arch repair (EVAAR) can potentially present a minimally invasive access with lesser local adverse events.

Techniques:

A retrospective review of consecutive EVAAR between January 2018 and January 2024, in a tertiary referral center, was performed to identify cases, in which diPerCa was used. Patients who were planned for EVAAR with no previous carotid intervention were included. A standardized technique was employed where an ultrasound-guided retrograde puncture of the carotid artery was performed with a micro-puncture set and a suture-mediated closure device (pre-closure technique). Of the 13 included patients, technical success was achieved in 12 (92.3%), with one intraoperative death unrelated to diPerCa. Major complications included one case of carotid pseudoaneurysm and one case of non–flow-limiting carotid dissection. Minor complications were unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy in one case and new-onset dizziness in one case. All carotid arteries remained patent without stenosis, with one case of non-progressing dissection noted at the conclusion of the mean follow-up of 22.5±2.4 months.

Conclusion:

Direct percutaneous carotid access with suture-mediated closure devices during EVAAR is feasible with acceptable results and low incidence of clinically relevant neurological and local complications. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and evaluate long-term outcomes.

Clinical Impact

Direct percutaneous carotid access (diPerCa) during endovascular aortic arch repair (EVAAR) offers a minimally invasive alternative to retrograde access via open surgical exposure. This technique, supported by suture-based closure devices, demonstrates no stroke and low rates of local complications. Overall outcomes are promising, suggesting diPerCa as a feasible option for select patients. Further research is warranted to validate these findings and assess long-term outcomes.

Keywords

percutaneous carotid access endovascular aortic arch repair transcarotid access preclosure device

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Tenorio

Oderich

Kölbel

, et al. Multicenter global early feasibility study to evaluate total endovascular arch repair using three-vessel inner branch stent-grafts for aneurysms and dissections. J Vasc Surg. 2021;74(4):1055–1065.

Batchelder

Saratzis

Ross Naylor

Editor’s choice—overview of primary and secondary analyses from 20 randomised controlled trials comparing carotid artery stenting with carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;58(4):479–493.

Group

GTC

Lewis

Warlow

, et al. General anaesthesia versus local anaesthesia for carotid surgery (GALA): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;372(9656):2132–2142.

Karelis

Dias

Holmström

, et al. Inferior vena cava-balloon occlusion and its effect on the myocardium during endograft deployment in the arch. J Endovasc Ther. 2023;30(6):931–936.

Kölbel

Rohlffs

Wipper

, et al. Carbon dioxide flushing technique to prevent cerebral arterial air embolism and stroke during TEVAR. J Endovasc Ther. 2016;23(2):393–395.

Monney

Fournier

, et al. Transcervical approach versus transfemoral approach for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Int J Cardiol. 2021;327:58–62.

Overtchouk

Folliguet

Pinaud

, et al. Transcarotid approach for transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the Sapien 3 prosthesis: a multicenter French registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(5):413–419.

Luk

Chan

Cheng

SW.

Transcarotid artery revascularization as a new modality of treatment for carotid stenosis. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;64:397–404.

Pongan

Nowacka

Antiochos

, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the transcervical vascular access (from a 7-year experience from a Swiss tertiary center). Am J Cardiol. 2023;201:86–91.

10.

Usman

Rawasia

Siddiqi

, et al. Meta-analysis evaluating the safety and efficacy of transcarotid transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol. 2019;124(12):1940–1946.