AbuRahmaAFAvgerinosEDChangRW, et al. Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines for management of extracranial cerebrovascular disease. J Vasc Surg. 2022;75(1):4S–22S.
2.
NaylorRRantnerBAncettiS, et al. Editor’s Choice; European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 clinical practice guidelines on the management of atherosclerotic carotid and vertebral artery disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023;65(1):7–111.
3.
MathiasKJägerHHennigsS, et al. Endoluminal treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis. World J Surg. 2001;25(3):328–334; discussion 334.
4.
MüllerMDLyrerPBrownMM, et al. Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid artery stenosis. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2020;2020(2):CD000515.
5.
SchillingerMGschwendtnerMReimersB, et al. Does carotid stent cell design matter?Stroke. 2008;39(3):905–909.
6.
de VriesEEKökMHovingAM, et al. (In)Comparability of carotid artery stent characteristics: a systematic review on assessment and comparison with manufacturer data. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020;43(10):1430–1437.
7.
BosiersMde DonatoGDelooseK, et al. Does free cell area influence the outcome in carotid artery stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;33(2):135–141; discussion 142.
8.
FaatehMDakour-AridiHMathlouthiA, et al. Comparison of open- and closed-cell stent design outcomes after carotid artery stenting in the Vascular Quality Initiative. J Vasc Surg. 2021;73(5):1639–1648.
9.
TimaranCHRoseroEBHigueraA, et al. Randomized clinical trial of open-cell vs closed-cell stents for carotid stenting and effects of stent design on cerebral embolization. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54(5):1310–1316.
10.
ParkKYKimDIKimBM, et al. Incidence of embolism associated with carotid artery stenting: open-cell versus closed-cell stents: clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2013;119(3):642–647.
11.
de VriesEEMeershoekAJAVonkenEJ, et al. A meta-analysis of the effect of stent design on clinical and radiologic outcomes of carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69(6):1952–1961.
12.
CremonesiARubinoPGrattoniC, et al. Multicenter experience with a new “hybrid” carotid stent. J Endovasc Ther. 2008;15(2):186–192.
13.
ParkJHLeeJH.Carotid artery stenting. Korean Circulat J. 2018;48(2):97–113.
Hopf-JensenSMarquesLPreißM, et al. Initial clinical experience with the micromesh roadsaver carotid artery stent for the treatment of patients with symptomatic carotid artery disease. J Endovasc Ther. 2015;22(2):220–225.
16.
MusiałekPHopkinsLNSiddiquiAH.One swallow does not a summer make but many swallows do: accumulating clinical evidence for nearly-eliminated peri-procedural and 30-day complications with mesh-covered stents transforms the carotid revascularisation field. Adv Intervent Cardiol / postępy W Kardiologii Interwencyjnej. 2017;13(2):95–106.
17.
Hopf-JensenSLeissnerMMarquesL, et al. Micromesh dual-layer technology for carotid artery stents. Vasc Disease Manage. 2016;13(10):E222–E229.
18.
MazurekAMalinowskiKRosenfieldK, et al. Clinical outcomes of second- versus first-generation carotid stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022;11:16.
19.
LanghoffRPetrovIKedevS, et al. PERFORMANCE 1 study: novel carotid stent system with integrated post-dilation balloon and embolic protection device. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;100(6):1090–1099.
