Physician-Modified Endografts for the Treatment of Thoracic Aortic Pathologies Involving the Aortic Arch

Abstract

Objective:

This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of physician-modified endografts (PMEGs) for the treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch.

Methods:

A retrospective single-center study was performed on consecutive patients with thoracic aortic pathologies treated by PMEGs between February 2018 and May 2022. Data on baseline characteristics, operative procedure, and follow-up information were collected. The endpoints included technical success, complications, mortality, overall survival, re-intervention, and target vessel instability.

Results:

This study comprised 173 patients (mean age=58±13, range=28–83, 148 men) with thoracic aortic pathologies, including 44 thoracic aortic aneurysms, 113 aortic dissections (9 type A, 4 residual type A, 75 type B, 32 non-A non-B), 3 aortic intramural hematomas, and 13 penetrating aortic ulcers. Thirty-five of the patients had PMEGs with 3 fenestrations, 32 had 2 fenestrations, and 106 had 1 single fenestration. Technical success was 98% (170/173), and the 30-day mortality was 2% (3/173). Perioperative complications included stroke (n=3, 2%), retrograde type A dissection (RTAD; n=3, 2%) and renal injury (n=3, 2%). Seven deaths (4%) were noted during a median follow-up of 11 (range=1–52) months. Eleven cases of re-intervention were stent-related. There were 5 type Ia endoleaks (3%), 2 type III endoleaks (1%) from the innominate artery (IA), and 3 type Ic endoleaks (2%) from the left subclavian arteries. One case of IA stent-graft (SG) stenosis was noted because of mural thrombus. Estimate rates of overall survival, freedom from secondary intervention, and freedom from target vessel instability at 2 years were 93.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]=88.7%–98.1%), 80.7% (95% CI=73.3%–88.1%), and 89.0% (95% CI=80.4%–97.6%), respectively.

Conclusions:

Physician-modified endografts showed promising immediate therapeutic results in the treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch. Our study demonstrates that the technique is feasible and produces acceptable results. Long-term outcomes are required for further refinement of this technical approach to confirm technical success and durability over time as a valuable option for endovascular aortic arch repair in specialized centers.

Clinical impact

Our short- and mid-term outcomes of physician-modified endografts in 173 patients showed promising results compared to other branched/fenestrated techniques and backed up the endovascular repair of the aortic arch. Meanwhile, the technical expertise pointed out in our manuscript, including preloaded guidewire, diameter-reducing wire and inner mini-cuffs, provided reference and technical guidance for our peers. Most importantly, it demonstrated that the PMEG, as a device whose components were all commercially available, might be a better option for emergency surgery and for centers who had no access to custom-made devices.

Keywords

physician-modified endograft thoracic endovascular aortic repair aortic arch

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Xenos

Minion

Davenport

, et al. Endovascular versus open repair for descending thoracic aortic rupture: institutional experience and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;35(2):282–286. doi:10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.10.042.

Boufi

Patterson

Loundou

, et al. Endovascular versus open repair for chronic type b dissection treatment: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;107(5):1559–1570. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.10.045.

Czerny

Schmidli

Adler

, et al. Editor’s choice—current options and recommendations for the treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch: an expert consensus document of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) & the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57(2):165–198. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.016.

Wang

, et al. Endovascular chimney technique for aortic arch pathologies treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018;47:305–315. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2017.09.006.

Shang

Tian

, et al. Favourable outcomes of endovascular total aortic arch repair via needle based in situ fenestration at a mean follow-up of 5.4 months. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;55(3):369–376. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.11.022.

Spanos

Tsilimparis

Rohlffs

, et al. Total endovascular arch repair is the procedure of the future. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2018;59(4):559–571. doi:10.23736/S0021-9509.18.10412-5.

Tsilimparis

Debus

von Kodolitsch

, et al. Branched versus fenestrated endografts for endovascular repair of aortic arch lesions. J Vasc Surg. 2016;64(3):592–599. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2016.03.410.

Xydas

Mihos

Williams

, et al. Hybrid repair of aortic arch aneurysms: a comprehensive review. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(suppl 7):S629–S634. doi:10.21037/jtd.2017.06.47.

Xue

Sun

Zheng

, et al. The chimney technique for preserving the left subclavian artery in thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47(4):623–629. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezu266.

10.

Donas

Lee

Lachat

, et al. Collected world experience about the performance of the snorkel/chimney endovascular technique in the treatment of complex aortic pathologies: the PERICLES registry. Ann Surg. 2015;262(3):546–553; discussion 552. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000001405.

11.

Linsen

Jongkind

Nio

, et al. Pararenal aortic aneurysm repair using fenestrated endografts. J Vasc Surg. 2012;56(1):238–246. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.092.

12.

Atkins

Lumsden

AB.

Parallel grafts and physician modified endografts for endovascular repair of the aortic arch. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;11(1):16–25. doi:10.21037/acs-2021-taes-171.

13.

Canaud

Chassin-Trubert

Abouliatim

, et al. Total arch thoracic endovascular aortic repair using double fenestrated physician-modified stent-grafts: 100 patients [published online ahead of print August 4, 2022]. J Endovasc Ther. doi:10.1177/15266028221116747.

14.

Canaud

Baba

Gandet

, et al. Physician-modified thoracic stent-grafts for the treatment of aortic arch lesions. J Endovasc Ther. 2017;24(4):542–548. doi:10.1177/1526602817714206.

15.

Chassin-Trubert

Gandet

Lounes

, et al. Double fenestrated physician-modified stent-grafts for total aortic arch repair in 50 patients. J Vasc Surg. 2021;73(6):1898–1905. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2020.09.041.

16.

Chastant

Belarbi

Ozdemir

, et al. Handmade fenestrated physician-modified stent grafts for arch aortic degenerative aneurysms [published online ahead of print June 10, 2022]. J Vasc Surg. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2022.04.041.

17.

World Health Organization (WHO). Obesity and overweight. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight. Accessed April 17, 2021.

18.

Spear

Haulon

Ohki

, et al. Editor’s choice—subsequent results for arch aneurysm repair with inner branched endografts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;51(3):380–385. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.12.002.

19.

Czerny

Berger

Kondov

, et al. Results of endovascular aortic arch repair using the Relay Branch system. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;60(3):662–668. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezab160.

20.

Tenorio

Oderich

Kölbel

, et al. Multicenter global early feasibility study to evaluate total endovascular arch repair using three-vessel inner branch stent-grafts for aneurysms and dissections. J Vasc Surg. 2021;74(4):1055–1065. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2021.03.029.

21.

Chen

, et al. Endovascular in situ fenestration technique of aortic arch pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Vasc Surg. 2021;76:472–480. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2020.12.021.

22.

Canonge

Jayet

Heim

, et al. Comprehensive review of physician modified aortic stent grafts: technical and clinical outcomes. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021;61(4):560–569. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.01.019.

23.

Chen

Zhang

Liu

, et al. Retrograde type A aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(9):e004649. doi:10.1161/JAHA.116.004649.

24.

Massmann

Kunihara

Fries

, et al. Uncovered stent implantation in complicated acute aortic dissection type B. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(6):3003–3011. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.07.053.

25.

Brown

Arnaoutakis

Szeto

, et al. Endovascular repair of the aortic arch: state of the art. J Card Surg. 2021;36(11):4292–4300. doi:10.1111/jocs.15920.

26.

Reyes Valdivia

Pitoulias

, et al. Systematic review on the use of physician-modified endografts for the treatment of aortic arch diseases. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;69:418–425. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2020.07.040.