RaffortJAdamCCarrierM, et al. Fundamentals in artificial intelligence for vascular surgeons. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;65:254–260.
2.
LareyreFChaptoukaevHKiangSC, et al. Telemedicine and digital health applications in vascular surgery. J Clin Med. 2022;11(20):6047.
3.
SermesantMDelingetteHCochetH, et al. Applications of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular imaging. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18:600–609.
4.
LareyreFLêCDBallaithA, et al. Applications of artificial intelligence in non-cardiac vascular diseases: a bibliographic analysis. Angiology. 2022;73(7):606–614.
5.
JavidanAPLiALeeMH, et al. A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in vascular surgery. Ann Vasc Surg. 2022;85:395–405.
6.
SabaLSanagalaSSGuptaSK, et al. Multimodality carotid plaque tissue characterization and classification in the artificial intelligence paradigm: a narrative review for stroke application. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(14):1206.
7.
LiBFeridooniTCuen-OjedaC, et al. Machine learning in vascular surgery: a systematic review and critical appraisal. NPJ Digit Med. 2022;5(1):7.
8.
LareyreFBehrendtCAChaudhuriA, et al. Applications of artificial intelligence for patients with peripheral artery disease. J Vasc Surg. 2022;77:650.e1–658.e1.
9.
RaffortJAdamCCarrierM, et al. Artificial intelligence in abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2020;72(1):321.e1–333.e1.
10.
DeryckeLSénémaudJPerrinD, et al. Patient specific computer modelling for automated sizing of fenestrated stent grafts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;59(2):237–246.
11.
AfzalNSohnSAbramS, et al. Mining peripheral arterial disease cases from narrative clinical notes using natural language processing. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65(6):1753–1761.
12.
GeogheganLScarboroughAWormaldJCR, et al. Automated conversational agents for post-intervention follow-up: a systematic review. BJS Open. 2021;5(4):zrab070.
13.
LareyreFAdamCCarrierM, et al. Artificial intelligence for education of vascular surgeons. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;59(6):870–871.
14.
PirruccelloJPChaffinMDChouEL, et al. Deep learning enables genetic analysis of the human thoracic aorta. Nat Genet. 2022;54(1):40–51.
15.
LiJPanCZhangS, et al. Decoding the genomics of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cell. 2018;174(6):1361.e10–1372.e10.
16.
HarrerSShahPAntonyB, et al. Artificial intelligence for clinical trial design. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2019;40(8):577–591.
17.
CasciniFBecciaFCausioFA, et al. Scoping review of the current landscape of AI-based applications in clinical trials. Front Public Health. 2022;10:949377.
18.
ExtanceA. How AI technology can tame the scientific literature. Nature. 2018;561(7722):273–274.
CrawfordKCaloR. There is a blind spot in AI research. Nature. 2016;538(7625):311–313.
22.
BarocasSSelbstAD. Big data’s disparate impact. California Law Rev2016;671:104. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2477899; doi:10.2139/ssrn.2477899.
23.
KellyCJKarthikesalingamASuleymanM, et al. Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):195.
24.
AggarwalRSounderajahVMartinG, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning in medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. NPJ Digit Med. 2021;4(1):65.
25.
ShahNHMilsteinABagleySC. Making machine learning models clinically useful. JAMA. 2019;322(14):1351–1352.
SounderajahVAshrafianHKarthikesalingamA, et al. Developing specific reporting standards in artificial intelligence centred research. Ann Surg. 2022;275(3):e547–e548.
30.
SounderajahVAshrafianHRoseS, et al. A quality assessment tool for artificial intelligence-centered diagnostic test accuracy studies: QUADAS-AI. Nat Med. 2021;27(10):1663–1665.
31.
SounderajahVAshrafianHGolubRM, et al. Developing a reporting guideline for artificial intelligence-centred diagnostic test accuracy studies: the STARD-AI protocol. BMJ Open. 2021;11(6):e047709.
32.
LiuXCruz RiveraSMoherD, et al. Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension. Nat Med. 2020;26(9):1364–1374.
33.
RiveraSCLiuXChanAW, et al. Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI Extension. BMJ. 2020;370:m3210.
34.
WhitingPFRutjesAWWestwoodME, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):529–536.
MonganJMoyLKahnCEJr.Checklist for artificial intelligence in medical imaging (CLAIM): a guide for authors and reviewers. Radiol Artif Intell. 2020;2(2):e200029.
37.
FUTURE-AI: guiding principles and consensus recommendations for trustworthy artificial intelligence in medical imaging. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.09658. Accessed February 25, 2023.
38.
Hernandez-BoussardTBozkurtSIoannidisJPA, et al. MINIMAR (MINimum Information for Medical AI Reporting): developing reporting standards for artificial intelligence in health care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27(12):2011–2015.
39.
NorgeotBQuerGBeaulieu-JonesBK, et al. Minimum information about clinical artificial intelligence modeling: the MI-CLAIM checklist. Nat Med. 2020;26(9):1320–1324.
