Artificial Intelligence–Powered Technologies for the Management of Vascular Diseases: Building Guidelines and Moving Forward Evidence Generation

Abstract

Keywords

artificial intelligence machine learning e-health vascular surgery vascular disease

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Raffort

Adam

Carrier

, et al. Fundamentals in artificial intelligence for vascular surgeons. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;65:254–260.

Lareyre

Chaptoukaev

Kiang

, et al. Telemedicine and digital health applications in vascular surgery. J Clin Med. 2022;11(20):6047.

Sermesant

Delingette

Cochet

, et al. Applications of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular imaging. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18:600–609.

Lareyre

Lê

Ballaith

, et al. Applications of artificial intelligence in non-cardiac vascular diseases: a bibliographic analysis. Angiology. 2022;73(7):606–614.

Javidan

Lee

, et al. A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in vascular surgery. Ann Vasc Surg. 2022;85:395–405.

Saba

Sanagala

Gupta

, et al. Multimodality carotid plaque tissue characterization and classification in the artificial intelligence paradigm: a narrative review for stroke application. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(14):1206.

Feridooni

Cuen-Ojeda

, et al. Machine learning in vascular surgery: a systematic review and critical appraisal. NPJ Digit Med. 2022;5(1):7.

Lareyre

Behrendt

Chaudhuri

, et al. Applications of artificial intelligence for patients with peripheral artery disease. J Vasc Surg. 2022;77:650.e1–658.e1.

Raffort

Adam

Carrier

, et al. Artificial intelligence in abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2020;72(1):321.e1–333.e1.

10.

Derycke

Sénémaud

Perrin

, et al. Patient specific computer modelling for automated sizing of fenestrated stent grafts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;59(2):237–246.

11.

Afzal

Sohn

Abram

, et al. Mining peripheral arterial disease cases from narrative clinical notes using natural language processing. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65(6):1753–1761.

12.

Geoghegan

Scarborough

Wormald

JCR

, et al. Automated conversational agents for post-intervention follow-up: a systematic review. BJS Open. 2021;5(4):zrab070.

13.

Lareyre

Adam

Carrier

, et al. Artificial intelligence for education of vascular surgeons. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;59(6):870–871.

14.

Pirruccello

Chaffin

Chou

, et al. Deep learning enables genetic analysis of the human thoracic aorta. Nat Genet. 2022;54(1):40–51.

15.

Pan

Zhang

, et al. Decoding the genomics of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cell. 2018;174(6):1361.e10–1372.e10.

16.

Harrer

Shah

Antony

, et al. Artificial intelligence for clinical trial design. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2019;40(8):577–591.

17.

Cascini

Beccia

Causio

, et al. Scoping review of the current landscape of AI-based applications in clinical trials. Front Public Health. 2022;10:949377.

18.

Extance

. How AI technology can tame the scientific literature. Nature. 2018;561(7722):273–274.

19.

U.S. National Library of Medicine. Automated detection and triage of large vessel occlusions using artificial intelligence for early and rapid treatment (ALERT). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04142879?cond=artificial+intelligence+vascular&draw=2&rank=1. Accessed February 19, 2023.

20.

U.S. National Library of Medicine. The role of artificial intelligence in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT05643664?cond=artificial+intelligence+vascular&draw=2&rank=9. Accessed February 19, 2023.

21.

Crawford

Calo

. There is a blind spot in AI research. Nature. 2016;538(7625):311–313.

22.

Barocas

Selbst

. Big data’s disparate impact. California Law Rev 2016;671:104. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2477899; doi:10.2139/ssrn.2477899.

23.

Kelly

Karthikesalingam

Suleyman

, et al. Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):195.

24.

Aggarwal

Sounderajah

Martin

, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning in medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. NPJ Digit Med. 2021;4(1):65.

25.

Shah

Milstein

Bagley

. Making machine learning models clinically useful. JAMA. 2019;322(14):1351–1352.

26.

U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Good machine learning practice for medical device development: guiding principles. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/software-medical-device-samd/good-machine-learning-practice-medical-device-development-guiding-principles. Accessed February 23, 2023.

27.

European Commission. Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. https://ec.europa.eu/futurium/en/ai-alliance-consultation.1.html. Accessed February 23, 2023.

28.

RSNA. Guidelines for reporting AI research. https://pubs.rsna.org/page/ai/blog/2022/09/ryai_editorsblog0928. Accessed February 23, 2023.

29.

Sounderajah

Ashrafian

Karthikesalingam

, et al. Developing specific reporting standards in artificial intelligence centred research. Ann Surg. 2022;275(3):e547–e548.

30.

Sounderajah

Ashrafian

Rose

, et al. A quality assessment tool for artificial intelligence-centered diagnostic test accuracy studies: QUADAS-AI. Nat Med. 2021;27(10):1663–1665.

31.

Sounderajah

Ashrafian

Golub

, et al. Developing a reporting guideline for artificial intelligence-centred diagnostic test accuracy studies: the STARD-AI protocol. BMJ Open. 2021;11(6):e047709.

32.

Liu

Cruz Rivera

Moher

, et al. Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension. Nat Med. 2020;26(9):1364–1374.

33.

Rivera

Liu

Chan

, et al. Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI Extension. BMJ. 2020;370:m3210.

34.

Whiting

Rutjes

Westwood

, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):529–536.

35.

Equator Network. https://www.equator-network.org. Accessed February 23, 2023.

36.

Mongan

Moy

Kahn

Jr.

Checklist for artificial intelligence in medical imaging (CLAIM): a guide for authors and reviewers. Radiol Artif Intell. 2020;2(2):e200029.

37.

FUTURE-AI: guiding principles and consensus recommendations for trustworthy artificial intelligence in medical imaging. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.09658. Accessed February 25, 2023.

38.

Hernandez-Boussard

Bozkurt

Ioannidis

JPA

, et al. MINIMAR (MINimum Information for Medical AI Reporting): developing reporting standards for artificial intelligence in health care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27(12):2011–2015.

39.

Norgeot

Quer

Beaulieu-Jones

, et al. Minimum information about clinical artificial intelligence modeling: the MI-CLAIM checklist. Nat Med. 2020;26(9):1320–1324.