Technical Feasibility and Safety of a Snare-Less,EVAR–First Technique for Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis

Abstract

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the technical feasibility, safety, and early outcomes of a snare-less, endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR)-first technique (SET) for iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE) placement.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who received IBEs between July 2018 and March 2022. Patients were divided into 2 categories based on method of IBE deployment: SET or Standard. Primary endpoints were technical success, major adverse events, mortality, reintervention, internal iliac artery (IIA) patency, and freedom from IIA branch instability. Technical success was defined by successful deployment of both the EVAR and the IBE with maintained patency of the IIA and no stent graft migration.

Results:

There were 20 patients (90% male, median age 72 [65.4-74.5] years) who underwent IBE placement. Among these, 5 (33.3%) underwent SET to treat 5 common iliac artery (CIA)/IIA aneurysms, while the remaining 15 (66.7%) underwent standard IBE deployment with through-and-through femoral access (n=13) or trans-brachial access (n=2) to treat 19 CIA/IIA aneurysms. Overall median renal to iliac bifurcation length was 169 (152-177) mm, with 9 patients falling short of the minimum of 165 mm for on-label IBE placement. Median contrast used was 148 (120-201) mL, fluoroscopy time 42.8 (35.0-49.8) minutes, estimated blood loss 200 (100-275) mL, and procedure time 192 (167-246) minutes, with no significant differences between the 2 groups. Technical success was achieved in 100% of cases. At 30 days, there were no mortalities or major adverse events in either group; there were 100% IIA patency, no IIA instability, and no reinterventions in both groups. Median follow-up in the SET group was 5.7 (5.5-6.2) months, with 1 death at 6 months and 1 type 1B endoleak at 6 months requiring reintervention. Median follow-up for the Standard group was 1.6 (0.8-2.1) years with 2 non–aneurysm-related deaths and no reinterventions at 1 year.

Conclusions:

SET for IBE is a safe and effective approach that decreases technical complexity and mitigates anatomic barriers to IBE placement.

Clinical Impact

SET for IBE is a safe and effective approach to IBE placement that decreases technical complexity. A critical component to this technique is a large bore sheath with a stiff steerable tip. Importantly, this approach also mitigates anatomic barriers to IBE placement, expanding applicability of IBE technology to patients who may be otherwise ineligible.

Keywords

aorto-iliac vessels branched stent graft aneurysm common iliac artery internal iliac artery abdominal aortic aneurysm target artery/vessel/branch endovascular aortic aneurysm repair endograft

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wanhainen

Verzini

Van Herzeele

, et al. Editor’s choice—European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57(1):8–93. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.020.

Chaikof

Dalman

Eskandari

, et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67(1):2–77.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044.

Muzepper

Zhou

. Anatomic suitability of iliac branched devices for Chinese patients with abdominal-iliac aortic aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;67:178–184. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2020.03.010.

Pearce

Varu

Glocker

, et al. Anatomic suitability of aortoiliac aneurysms for next generation branched systems. Ann Vasc Surg. 2015;29(1):69–75. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2014.08.003.

Schneider

Matsumura

Lee

, et al. Prospective, multicenter study of endovascular repair of aortoiliac and iliac aneurysms using the gore iliac branch endoprosthesis. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66(3):775–785. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2017.02.041.

Karthikesalingam

Hinchliffe

Malkawi

, et al. Morphological suitability of patients with aortoiliac aneurysms for endovascular preservation of the internal iliac artery using commercially available iliac branch graft devices. J Endovasc Ther. 2010;17(2):163–171. doi:10.1583/09-2942.1.

Gouveia

Melo

Fenelli

Fernández Prendes

, et al. A cross-sectional study on the anatomic feasibility of iliac side branch grafts in a real-world setting. J Vasc Surg. 2022;76(3):724–732. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2022.02.056.

Fereydooni

Deyholos

Botta

, et al. Bifurcated unibody aortic endografts can overcome unfavorable aortoiliac anatomy for deployment of bilateral iliac branch endoprostheses. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2019;5(2):174–178. doi:10.1016/j.jvscit.2019.01.004.

Brahmandam

Chen

Tonnessen

, et al. Alternative endograft aortoiliac reconstruction for iliac branch endoprostheses. Ann Vasc Surg. 2021;77:38–46. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2021.05.065.

10.

Mastracci

Greenberg

Eagleton

, et al. Durability of branches in branched and fenestrated endografts. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57(4):926–933; discussion 933. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.071.

11.

Tenorio

Oderich

Sandri

, et al. Outcomes of an iliac branch endoprosthesis using an “up-and-over” technique for endovascular repair of failed bifurcated grafts. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70(2):497–508. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2018.10.098.

12.

Png

CYM

Cornwall

Faries

, et al. Bilateral GORE iliac branch endoprosthesis with prior open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2019;5(2):84–87. doi:10.1016/j.jvscit.2018.08.004.

13.

Dawson

Sandri

Tenorio

, et al. Up-and-over technique for implantation of iliac branch devices after prior aortic endograft repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2018;25(1):21–27. doi:10.1177/1526602817747283.