Predicting Features of Visceral Stent Failure in Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Abstract

Purpose:

Visceral stents in fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR) have a significant risk of complications and carry a considerable burden of reinterventions. The aim of this study is to identify preoperative and intraoperative predictors of visceral stent failure.

Materials:

A retrospective review of 75 consecutive FEVARs in a single center from 2013 to 2021 was undertaken. Data on mortality, stent failure, and reintervention pertaining to 226 visceral stents were collected.

Methods:

Anatomical features including aortic neck angulation, aneurysm diameter, and angulation of target viscerals were obtained from preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Stent oversizing and intraprocedural complications were recorded. Postoperative CT scans were analyzed to determine the length of cover of target vessels.

Results:

Only bridging stents through fenestrations to visceral vessels were considered; 28 (37%) cases had 4 visceral stents, 24 (32%) had 3, 19 (25%) had 2, 4 (5%) had 1. Thirty day mortality was 8%, a third of which was related to visceral stent complications. Intraprocedural complexity was documented during the cannulation of 8 (3.5%) target vessels, with a technical success rate of 98.7%. A significant endoleak or visceral stent failure was identified in 22 stents (9.8%) postoperatively, of which 7 (3%) had in-patient reintervention within 30 days. Further reinterventions at 1, 2, and 3 years were 12 (5.4%), 2 (1%), and 1 (0.4%), respectively. Most reinterventions were for renal stents (n=19, 86%). A smaller stent diameter and a shorter length of visceral stent were significant predictors of failure. No other anatomical feature or stent choice was found to be a significant predictor of failure.

Conclusions:

The modality of visceral stent failures varies, but renal stents with a smaller diameter and/or shorter length are more likely to fail over time. Their complications and reinterventions are common and carry a significant burden; therefore, close surveillance must be continued long term.

Clinical impact

With this work we share the methodology adopted at our centre to treat juxtarenal aneurysm with FEVAR. Thanks to this detailed review of anatomical and technical features we provide guidance for endovascular surgeons to face hostile aneurysm with peculiar visceral vessels anatomy. With our findings will also motivate industries in their attempt to produce improved technologies able to overcome issues identified in this paper.

Keywords

abdominal aortic aneurysm fenestrated stent graft balloon-expandable stents fenestration juxtarenal aneurysm reintervention stent graft endoleak stent thrombosis target artery/vessel/branch

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Browne

Hartley

Purchas

, et al. A fenestrated covered suprarenal aortic stent. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1999;18(5):445–449. doi:10.1053/ejvs.1999.0924.

Rao

Lane

TRA

Franklin

, et al. Open repair versus fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair of juxtarenal aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(1):245–255. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2014.08.068.

Oderich

Ribeiro

Reis de Souza

, et al. Endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms using fenestrated and branched endografts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153(2):S32–S41. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.10.008.

Kärkkäinen

Tenorio

Jain

, et al. Outcomes of target vessel endoleaks after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2020;72(2):445–455. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2019.09.055.

Oderich

Forbes

Chaer

, et al. Reporting standards for endovascular aortic repair of aneurysms involving the renal-mesenteric arteries. J Vasc Surg. 2021;73(1):4S–52S. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2020.06.011.

Roy

Millen

Jones

, et al. Long-term follow-up of fenestrated endovascular repair for juxtarenal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2017;104(8):1020–1027. doi:10.1002/bjs.10524.

Rao Vallabhaneni

Brennan

Buth

, et al. Global collaborators on advanced stent-graft techniques for aneurysm repair (GLOBALSTAR) project. J Endovasc Ther. 2007;14(3):352–356. doi:10.1583/07-2161.1.

Mezzetto

Scorsone

Silingardi

, et al. Bridging stents in fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair: a systematic review. Ann Vasc Surg. 2021;73:454–462. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2020.10.052.

Patel

Roy

McWilliams

, et al. Characterising the incidence and mode of visceral stent failure after fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR). JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2021;10:20480040211012503. doi:10.1177/20480040211012503.

10.

Mohabbat

Greenberg

Mastracci

, et al. Revised duplex criteria and outcomes for renal stents and stent grafts following endovascular repair of juxtarenal and thoracoabdominal aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49(4):827–837. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2008.11.024.

11.

Hauck

Kupferthaler

Freund

, et al. Structural failure in bridging stentgrafts for branched endovascular aneurysm repair: a case–control study. Insights Imaging. 2022;13(1):62. doi:10.1186/s13244-022-01196-6.

12.

Chait

Tenorio

Mendes

, et al. Impact of gap distance between fenestration and aortic wall on target artery instability following fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2022;76(1):79–87. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2022.01.135.

13.

Mastracci

Eagleton

Kuramochi

, et al. Twelve-year results of fenestrated endografts for juxtarenal and group IV thoracoabdominal aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(2):355–364. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2014.09.068.

14.

Karaolanis

Antonopoulos

Scali

, et al. Systematic review with pooled data analysis reveals the need for a standardized reporting protocol including the visceral vessels during fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FEVAR). Vascular. 2022;30(3):405–417. doi:10.1177/17085381211019148.

15.

Panuccio

Bisdas

Berekoven

, et al. Performance of bridging stent grafts in fenestrated and branched aortic endografting. Eur J Vasc .Endovasc Surg. 2015;50(1):60–70. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.03.023.