Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Computed Tomography Angiography in Sizing and Operative Management of Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Abstract

Objectives:

An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a potentially life-threatening condition, the management of which has dramatically evolved over the past 2 decades with an increasing tendency toward endovascular repair (EVAR) rather than open surgical repair. Classically, contrast-enhanced multislice computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) is performed preoperatively for procedure sizing and EVAR planning. This entails voluminous contrast injection with risk of allergic reaction, nephropathy, and radiation exposure. Intra-vascular ultrasound (IVUS) has been increasingly used to guide EVAR procedures intraoperatively. The aim of this study is to investigate the accuracy of IVUS in sizing AAAs, device selection, and EVAR planning compared to the gold standard CTA.

Design:

This is a prospective observational study enrolling 10 patients who underwent standard infrarenal EVAR procedures performed for unruptured infrarenal AAAs over the course of 1 year. All patients had a preoperative CTA done upon which aneurysm sizing and device planning were performed, and the measurements obtained were compared to those obtained from intraoperative IVUS.

Methods:

All participating patients had unruptured infrarenal AAA, had no renal impairment, and had anatomical suitability for EVAR according to the instructions for use (IFU) of the device manufacturer. Primary endpoint was comparing anatomical measurements recorded by IVUS with those obtained from the preoperative CTA.

Results:

Mean age was 65.6 (±6.19), all patients were males and hypertensives and 4 (40%) had a positive family history for AAA. On comparing mean measurements taken by CTA and IVUS, there was no statistically significant differences with exception of maximal aortic diameter and aortic diameter at site of bifurcation (both p-values <.001). There were no statistically significant differences in length measurements between the 2 imaging modalities. Computed tomography angiography was more associated with neck thrombus detection, and IVUS was more associated with calcification detection.

Conclusion:

Although CT angiography is still the gold standard imaging modality for AAA, IVUS use is very beneficial in EVAR sizing and planning, in addition to intra-operative guidance of the procedure, saving the patient significant time, contrast administration, and radiation exposure, especially in patients with renal impairment and contrast allergy.

Clinical Impact

A preoperative CT angiogram is the gold standard required investigation for planning and sizing EVARs, with subsequent contrast injection entailing a risk of contrast induced nephropathy and allergic reactions. IVUS has been used as an adjuvant technique to guide EVAR stent graft deployment. However, our study concluded that it can also be reliably used in sizing and planning of the EVAR stent graft along with complementary non contrast imaging, especially in patients with high risk for contrast induced nephropathy and contrast allergy.

Keywords

IVUS intravascular ultrasound EVAR endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Marcaccio

Schermerhorn

ML.

Epidemiology of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Semin Vasc Surg. 2021;34:29–37. doi:10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2021.02.004.

Lederle

FA.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm—open versus endovascular repair. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1677–1679. doi:10.1056/nejme048258.

Chaikof

Dalman

Eskandari

, et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67:2–77.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044.

Wanhainen

Verzini

Van Herzeele

, et al. Editor’s choice—European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57(1):8–93. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.09.020.

Rehman

Choksy

Howard

, et al. Comparison of patient radiation dose and contrast use during EVAR in a dedicated hybrid vascular OR and mobile imaging. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019;61:278–283. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2019.04.019.

Nana

Kouvelos

Brotis

, et al. The effect of endovascular aneurysm repair on renal function in patients treated for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Curr Pharm Des. 2019;25(44):4675–4685. doi:10.2174/1381612825666191129094923.

Karthikesalingam

Bahia

Patel

, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis indicates underreporting of renal dysfunction following endovascular aneurysm repair. Kidney Int. 2015;87(2):442–451. doi:10.1038/ki.2014.272.

Cheng

Hong

Yong

, et al. Validating the use of contrast-induced nephropathy prediction models in endovascular aneurysm repairs. J Vasc Surg. 2020;71(5):1546–1553. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2019.07.093.

Loffroy

Falvo

Galland

, et al. Intravascular ultrasound in the endovascular treatment of patients with peripheral arterial disease: current role and future perspectives. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020;7:551861. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2020.551861.

10.

Montminy

Thomasson

Tanaka

, et al. A comparison between intravascular ultrasound and venography in identifying key parameters essential for iliac vein stenting. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019;7(6):801–807. doi:10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.03.015.

11.

Gagne

Gasparis

Black

, et al. Analysis of threshold stenosis by multiplanar venogram and intravascular ultrasound examination for predicting clinical improvement after iliofemoral vein stenting in the VIDIO trial. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018;6(1):48–56. doi:10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.07.009.

12.

Belkin

Jackson

Foley

, et al. The use of intravascular ultrasound in the treatment of type B aortic dissection with thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair is associated with improved long-term survival. J Vasc Surg. 2020;72(2):490–497. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2019.10.073.

13.

Hoshina

Kato

Miyahara

, et al. A retrospective study of intravascular ultrasound use in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair: its usefulness and a description of the procedure. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40:559–563. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.07.018.

14.

Mascoli

Faggioli

Gallitto

, et al. Standardization of a carbon dioxide automated system for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018;51:160–169. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2018.01.099.

15.

Cho

KJ.

Can CO2 be a savior for endovascular aneurysm repair candidates with renal dysfunction? critical tips for safe CO2 angiography. Vasc Spec Int. 2020;36:66–70. doi:10.5758/VSI.200026.

16.

Chao

Major

Kumar

, et al. Carbon dioxide digital subtraction angiography-assisted endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in the azotemic patient. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45(3):451–458; discussion 458–460. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2006.11.017.

17.

Athanasiou

Fotiadis

Michalis

Atherosclerotic Plaque Characterization Methods Based on Coronary Imaging. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press; 2017.

18.

Czerny

Schmidli

Adler

, et al. Current options and recommendations for the treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch: an expert consensus document of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic surgery (EACTS) and the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESV). Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg. 2019;55(3):133–162. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezy313.

19.

Man

Rodriguez

Sharafuddin

MJ.

The use of preoperative imaging for planning endovascular and hybrid procedures. In: Hoballah

Bechara

, eds. Vascular Reconstructions. New York, NY: Springer; 2021:433–442. doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-1089-3_25.

20.

Illuminati

Pacilè

Ceccanei

, et al. Peroperative intravascular ultrasound for endovascular aneurysm repair versus peroperative angiography: a pilot study in fit patients with favorable anatomy. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;64:54–61. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2019.11.013.

21.

Pecoraro

Bracale

Farina

, et al. Single-center experience and preliminary results of intravascular ultrasound in endovascular aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019;56:209–215. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2018.09.016.

22.

Prasad

Martin

Mastracci

TM.

The evaluation of aortic dissections with intravascular ultrasonography. Vasc Dis Manag. 2011;8:E93–E97.

23.

Dzieciuchowicz

Krzyżański

Nowak

. Use of intravascular ultrasound in endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2020;16:202–205. doi:10.5114/aic.2020.96065.

24.

Shammas

Radaideh

Shammas

, et al. The role of precise imaging with intravascular ultrasound in coronary and peripheral interventions. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2019;15:283–290. doi:10.2147/VHRM.S210928.

25.

Mintz

GS.

Intravascular imaging of coronary calcification and its clinical implications. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(4):461–471. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.02.003.

26.

De Marco

Giaquinta

Davì

, et al. Contrast free approach of patients with abdominal aortic disease and renal insufficiency. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;58:E410. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.06.1052.

27.

Mascoli

Faggioli

Gallitto

, et al. Aortic neck severity in endovascular aneurysm repair is determined by multiple morphological characteristics. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;58:E656–E657. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.09.163.

28.

AbuRahma

Yacoub

Mousa

, et al. Aortic neck anatomic features and predictors of outcomes in endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms following vs not following instructions for use. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222(4):579–589. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.12.037.