Learning Curve and Long-Term Outcomes of Thoracic Endovascular Repair With the Relay Stent-Graft

Abstract

Purpose:

To define the learning curve of a widely employed stent-graft for thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) by analyzing procedural variables and their impact on long-term outcomes.

Materials and Methods:

Standard TEVARs for each major aortic thoracic disease were included excluding procedures using thoracoabdominal, arch fenestrated/branched devices and/or chimneys. The primary outcome was the learning curve analysis using the cumulative sum chart method. The secondary outcomes, presented as early (Q1–Q2) versus latest (Q3–Q4) quartiles of experience, were 30-day major adverse events (MAEs); procedural details (additional maneuvers, operative and fluoroscopy time, and contrast volume); 30-day clinical success; endoleak; aorta-related reintervention; and overall and aorta-related survival.

Results:

Between November 2005 and September 2021, 220 consecutive TEVAR procedures involving the Relay endograft (Terumo Aortic, Sunrise, FL, USA) were performed and included in the present analysis. The mean follow-up was 4.5 ± 3.9 years. The learning curve was reached after 10 patients. Secondary outcomes improved significantly over experience. Thirty-day MAE occurrence was 14.5% versus 11.8% (p=0.550). Additional maneuvers (p=0.009), access-vessel additional maneuvers (p=0.010), operative time (p=0.004), Relay Plus (p=0.001), and implantation of multiple stent-grafts (p=0.034) were independent risk markers for MAEs. Operative time (125.9 ± 66.7 vs 86.7 ± 48.5 minutes, p<0.001), contrast volume (185.4 ± 112.8 vs 140.5 ± 88.2 mL, p=0.003), and fluoroscopy time (12.4 ± 12.7 vs 8.8 ± 7.5 minutes, p=0.017) decreased significantly. Late endoleak occurrence was 19.5% with a nonsignificant reduction (21.8% vs 17.3%, p=0.395). Fluoroscopy time (hazard ratio [HR]=1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.0–1.1; p=0.008), contrast volume (HR=1.0; 95% CI=1.0–1.1; p=0.018), and type III aortic arch (HR=3.3; 95% CI=1.7–6.4; p<0.001) were independent risk markers for endoleak. Fluoroscopy time (HR=1.0; 95% CI=1.0–1.1; p=0.032) and type III aortic arch (HR=3.6; 95% CI=1.7–7.4; p=0.001) confirmed their significant association in a multivariable analysis.

Conclusion:

In a high-volume center with a consistent previous endovascular experience, the Relay graft presented satisfactory long-term results with a short learning curve supporting its reliability.

Clinical Impact

The manuscript addresses the understanding of how many TEVAR procedures with a currently implanted device have been required to reach the learning curve for an endovascular skilled center. Our TEVAR experience with the Relay stent-graft (Terumo Aortic) demonstrated that ten implantations were required to achieve the device-related learning curve. The fifteen-year analyzed period showed that intraoperative learning-related variables were associated with long-term clinical outcomes and both improved over time. The Relay stent-graft presented satisfactory long-term results along with a short learning curve in a high-volume endovascular center supporting its ongoing implantation.

Keywords

learning curve endovascular technique thoracic aorta endoleak aneurysm.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gennai

Leone

Maria Bartolotti

, et al. Endoleak outcomes with different stent-graft generations in a 25-years thoracic endovascular aortic repair experience [published online ahead of print December 31, 2021]. Vascular. doi:10.1177/17085381211051486.

Evangelista

Czerny

Nienaber

, et al. Interdisciplinary expert consensus on management of type B intramural haematoma and penetrating aortic ulcer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47(2):209–217.

Czerny

Funovics

Sodeck

, et al. Long-term results of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in atherosclerotic aneurysms involving the descending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140(6 Suppl):S179–S184; discussion S185.

Gennai

Leone

Andreoli

, et al. Influence of thoracic endovascular repair on aortic morphology in patients treated for blunt traumatic aortic injuries: long term outcomes in a multicentre study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;59(3):428–436.

Zipfel

Czerny

Funovics

, et al. Endovascular treatment of patients with types A and B thoracic aortic dissection using relay thoracic stent-grafts: results from the RESTORE patient registry. J Endovasc Ther. 2011;18(2):131–143.

Ziza

Canaud

Molinari

, et al. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a single center’s 15-year experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;151(6):1595–1603.

Harris

Olson

Panthofer

, et al. A frailty-based risk score predicts morbidity and mortality after elective endovascular repair of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;67:90–99.

Wiedemann

Mahr

Vadehra

, et al. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair in 300 patients: long-term results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95(5):1577–1583.

Patel

Williams

Drews

, et al. A 20-year experience with thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Ann Surg. 2014;260:691–697.

10.

Forbes

DeRose

Kribs

, et al. Cumulative sum failure analysis of the learning curve with endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2004;39(1):102–108.

11.

Starnes

Caps

Arthurs

, et al. Evaluation of the learning curve for fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2016;64(5):1219–1227.

12.

Mirza

Tenorio

Kärkkäinen

, et al. Learning curve of fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair for pararenal and thoracoabdominal aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2020;72(2):423–434.

13.

Funovics

Blum

Langenberger

, et al. Endovascular repair of the descending aorta and the aortic arch with the relay stent graft. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88(2):637–640.

14.

Riambau

Zipfel

Coppi

, et al. Final operative and midterm results of the European experience in the RELAY Endovascular Registry for Thoracic Disease (RESTORE) study. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(3):565–573.

15.

Riesterer

Beyersdorf

Scheumann

, et al. Accuracy of deployment of the Relay non-bare stent graft in the aortic arch. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019;28:797–802.

16.

Riambau

Giudice

Trabattoni

, et al. Prospective multicenter study of the low-profile relay stent-graft in patients with thoracic aortic disease: the regeneration study. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019;58:180–189.

17.

Farber

Lee

Szeto

, et al. Initial and midterm results of the Bolton Relay Thoracic Aortic Endovascular Pivotal Trial. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65(6):1556–1566.

18.

Mezzetto

Scorsone

Silingardi

, et al. Early and long-term results of ePTFE (Gore TAG®) versus Dacron (Relay Plus® Bolton) grafts in thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2021;71:419–427.

19.

Gennai

Leone

Saitta

, et al. Intravascular ultrasound in branched and fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair: initial experience in a single-center cohort study. J Endovasc Ther. 2021;28(6):828–836.

20.

Fortea-Sanchis

Escrig-Sos

Quality control techniques in surgery: application of cumulative sum (CUSUM) charts. Cir Esp. 2019;97(2):65–70.

21.

D’Oria

Scali

Mao

, et al. Association between hospital volume and failure to rescue after open or endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms in the VASCUNET and international consortium of vascular registries. Ann Surg. 2021;274:e452–e459.

22.

Silingardi

Azzoni

Giuliani

, et al. Unibody endografts for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair reduce radiation and nephrotoxic exposure compared with modular endografts. Ann Vasc Surg. 2015;29(4):751–757.

23.

Gennai

Leone

Karelis

, et al. Distal landing zone outcomes in thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with challenging morphology: a propensity-matched comparison of distal active fixation versus standard stent-graft. Int Angiol. 2021;41(1):24–32.