Chimney Technique and Single-Branched Stent Graft for the Left Subclavian Artery Preservation During Zone 2 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Acute Aortic Syndromes

Abstract

Purpose:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair assisted by the chimney technique or single-branched stent graft for the preservation of the left subclavian artery, and summarize our single-center experience with the techniques.

Materials and methods:

From February 2017 to June 2020, 137 patients who underwent left subclavian artery revascularization during zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair were enrolled. Patients had acute type B aortic dissection and penetrating aortic ulcer associated with intramural hematoma. The chimney technique was performed in 68 patients (group A), and single-branched stent graft was deployed in 69 patients (group B). All procedures were performed during the acute phase. Primary technical success, immediate postoperative endoleak, neurologic complications (stroke or spinal cord ischemia), 30-day mortality, 1-year technical success, all-cause mortality, patency of the left subclavian artery, and reintervention were analyzed. Comparing the occurrence of the Bird-Beak Configuration, defined as a gap between the aortic wall and the sent graft with stent protrusion into the aortic lumen more than 5 mm, was also performed.

Results:

Primary technique success was achieved in 66 and 67 patients in groups A and B, respectively. The incidence of immediate postoperative endoleak, neurologic complications (stroke or spinal cord ischemia), and 30-day mortality were 5.9%, 1.5%, and 4.4% in group A, and 2.9%, 2.9%, and 2.9% in group B, respectively. During follow-up, the 1-year technical success rate was similar in both groups. All-cause mortality was similar in both groups (3.1% in group A and 4.5% in group B). The patency of the left subclavian artery was not significantly different between the 2 groups with 2 and 3 occlusions in groups A and B, respectively. The rate of reintervention was higher in group B (3.1% vs 1.6%, p=0.536), with a non-significant difference. Bird-Beak Configuration was more prominent in group B with the incidence of 59.42%.

Conclusions:

Acting as minimally invasive alternatives, both techniques are feasible for left subclavian artery preservation during zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B acute aortic syndromes with encouraging mid-term outcomes. Long-term follow-up is required to confirm these findings.

Keywords

thoracic endovascular aortic repair type B acute aortic syndrome chimney stent graft branched stent graft left subclavian artery

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Riambau

Böckler

Brunkwall

, et al. Editor’s choice—management of descending thoracic aorta diseases. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;53(1):4–52.

Huang

Jiao

Zhang

, et al. Implantation of unibody single-branched stent graft for patients with type B aortic dissections involving the left subclavian artery: 1-year follow-up outcomes. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017;40(11):1678–1686.

Jing

Feng

, et al. Endovascular repair of aortic dissection involving the left subclavian artery by castor stent graft: a multicentre prospective trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;60:854–861.

Saito

Kimura

Odashiro

, et al. Feasibility of the Inoue single-branched stent-graft implantation for thoracic aortic aneurysm or dissection involving the left subclavian artery: short- to medium-term results in 17 patients. J Vasc Surg. 2005;41(2):206–212.

Appoo

Herget

Pozeg

, et al. Midterm results of endovascular stent grafts in the proximal aortic arch (zone 0): an imaging perspective. Can J Cardiol. 2015;31(6):731–737.

Czerny

Pacini

Aboyans

, et al. Current options and recommendations for the use of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in acute and chronic thoracic aortic disease: an expert consensus document of the European Society for Cardiology (ESC) Working Group of Cardiovascular Surgery, the ESC Working Group on Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Diseases, the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the ESC and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;59:65–73.

Erbel

Aboyans

Boileau

, et al. 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Aortic Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2873–2926.

Waterford

Chou

Bombien

, et al. Left subclavian arterial coverage and stroke during thoracic aortic endografting: a systematic review. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(1):381–389.

Wang

Shu

, et al. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair with single/double chimney technique for aortic arch pathologies. J Endovasc Ther. 2017;24(3):383–393.

10.

Hogendoorn

Schlösser

FJV

Moll

, et al. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair with the chimney graft technique. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58:502–511.

11.

Voskresensky

Scali

Feezor

, et al. Outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair using aortic arch chimney stents in high-risk patients. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66(1):9–20.e3.

12.

Bianco

Sultan

Kilic

, et al. Concomitant left subclavian artery revascularization with carotid-subclavian transposition during zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;159(4):1222–1227.

13.

Piffaretti

Pratesi

Gelpi

, et al. Comparison of two different techniques for isolated left subclavian artery revascularization during thoracic endovascular aortic repair in zone 2. J Endovasc Ther. 2018;25(6):740–749.

14.

Protack

Smith

Moennich

, et al. Midterm outcomes of subclavian artery revascularization in the setting of thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2020;72(4):1222–1228.

15.

Eggebrecht

Plicht

Kahlert

, et al. Intramural hematoma and penetrating ulcers: indications to endovascular treatment. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;38(6):659–665.

16.

Fang

Wang

Liu

, et al. Early outcomes of left subclavian artery revascularization using castor single-branched stent-graft in the treatment of type B aortic dissection or intramural hematoma. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;27:251–259.

17.

Ramdon

Patel

Hnath

, et al. Chimney stent graft for left subclavian artery preservation during thoracic endograft placement. J Vasc Surg. 2020;71(3):758–766.

18.

Kuo

Huang

Chen

. Handmade stent graft fenestration to preserve left subclavian artery in thoracic endovascular aortic repairdagger. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;56:587–594.

19.

Shu

Fan

Luo

, et al. Endovascular treatment for aortic arch pathologies: chimney, on-the-table fenestration, and in-situ fenestration techniques. J Thorac Dis. 2020;12:1437–1448.

20.

Smorenburg

SPM

Montesano

Hoogteijling

, et al. Anatomic suitability for branched thoracic endovascular repair in patients with aortic arch pathological features. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9:e016695.

21.

Patel

Dake

Bavaria

, et al. Branched endovascular therapy of the distal aortic arch: preliminary results of the feasibility multicenter trial of the gore thoracic branch endoprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(4):1190–1198.

22.

Criado

. A percutaneous technique for preservation of arch branch patency during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR): retrograde catheterization and stenting. J Endovasc Ther. 2007;14(1):54–58.

23.

Lindblad

Bin Jabr

Holst

, et al. Chimney grafts in aortic stent grafting: hazardous or useful technique? Systematic review of current data. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;50(6):722–731.

24.

Xue

Sun

Zheng

, et al. The chimney technique for preserving the left subclavian artery in thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47(4):623–629.

25.

Pecoraro

Lachat

Cayne

, et al. Mid-term results of chimney and periscope grafts in supra-aortic branches in high risk patients. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;54(3):295–302.

26.

Azevedo

Braga

Rodrigues

, et al. Persistent type I endoleak after endovascular treatment with chimney technique. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2016;3:32.

27.

Zhang

Zhu

, et al. Off-the-shelf devices for treatment of thoracic aortic diseases: midterm follow-up of TEVAR with chimneys or physician-made fenestrations. J Endovasc Ther. 2020;27(1):132–142.

28.

Zhang

Jiang

, et al. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair combined with assistant techniques and devices for the treatment of acute complicated Stanford type B aortic dissections involving aortic arch. Ann Vasc Surg. 2016;32:88–97.

29.

Zhang

Huang

Zhang

, et al. Comparison of chimney technique and single-branched stent graft for treating patients with type B aortic dissections that involved the left subclavian artery. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018;42:648–656.

30.

Liu

Zhang

Wang

, et al. Long-term outcomes of balloon-expandable bare stent as chimney stent in thoracic endovascular aortic repair for supra-aortic branches reconstruction. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(4):1261–1268.

31.

van Bakel

de Beaufort

Trimarchi

, et al. Status of branched endovascular aortic arch repair. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;7:406–413.

32.

Boufi

Alexandru

. Commentary: bird beak after TEVAR: hostile or benign sign? J Endovasc Ther. 2019;26:779–781.

33.

Kudo

Kuratani

Shimamura

, et al. Determining the optimal proximal landing zone for TEVAR in the aortic arch: comparing the occurrence of the bird-beak phenomenon in zone 0 vs zones 1 and 2. J Endovasc Ther. 2020;27(3):368–376.

34.

Canaud

Cathala

Joyeux

, et al. Improvement in conformability of the latest generation of thoracic stent grafts. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57(4):1084–1089.

35.

Bockler

Brunkwall

Taylor

, et al. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair of aortic arch pathologies with the conformable thoracic aortic graft: early and 2 year results from a European Multicentre Registry. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;51(6):791–800.

36.

Voigt

Bishawi

Ranney

, et al. Outcomes of carotid-subclavian bypass performed in the setting of thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69(3):701–709.