Temporary Reperfusion of the Aneurysm Sac as a Prevention of Spinal Cord Ischemia After Endovascular Treatment of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Restricted accessReview articleFirst published online June, 2023
Temporary Reperfusion of the Aneurysm Sac as a Prevention of Spinal Cord Ischemia After Endovascular Treatment of Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is still a feared complication for patients suffering from thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) who undergo endovascular treatment. The aims of this work are to review the available literature on different reperfusion methods of the aneurysm sac, and to analyze whether the different reperfusion methods, also in combination with other factors, are effective in reducing SCI risk and if the impact varies with the patient’s age.
Methods
PubMed/MEDLINE library was searched for studies published until November 2020 concerning TAAA, endovascular repair, and SCI preventive measures. Systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria. Primary outcome consisted of correlation between endovascular repair techniques (type A: single step; type B: staged approach with reperfusion branches; type C: staged sequential approach with positioning of the thoracic component). A logistic-weighted regression for each event (SCI, transient, and permanent) was then performed with type of treatment, age, and interaction between them as input factors. Finally, another logistic-weighted regression was performed to analyze the other relevant factors for which observations are available together with the endovascular technique.
Results
Data from 53 studies with a total of 3095 patients were analyzed. Type A, type B, and type C endovascular strategies were adopted in 75%, 13%, and 12% of studied patients, respectively. Data showed that both type B and type C treatments are associated with lower risk of SCI, with a higher reduction of type C with respect to type B, although this positive trend is limited for elder patients. Moreover, a greater aortic diameter, a reduced aneurysm extent, and the absence of cerebrospinal fluid drainage positioning contribute to lower the risk of SCI. Concerning permanent SCI, both type B and type C are effective in reducing percentages for all ages, with type C treatment more beneficial for younger patients and type B for elder ones.
Conclusion
According to the anatomy and the endovascular repair feasibility criteria, staged endovascular treatment appears to offer relevant advantages over single-step treatment in reducing the risk of SCI, regardless of the reperfusion method adopted.
HarrisonSCAguOHarrisPL, et al. Elective sac perfusion to reduce the risk of neurologic events following endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55(4):1202–1205.
2.
KasprzakPMGallisKCucuruzB, et al. Editor’s choice—temporary aneurysm sac perfusion as an adjunct for prevention of spinal cord ischemia after branched endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;48(3):258–265.
3.
YoussefMSalemODünschedeF, et al. Adjunct perfusion branch for reduction of spinal cord ischemia in the endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;66(3):233–239.
4.
EtzCDZoliSMuellerCS, et al. Staged repair significantly reduces paraplegia rate after extensive thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139(6):1464–1472.
5.
GreenbergRKLuQRoselliEE, et al. Contemporary analysis of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair: a comparison of endovascular and open techniques. Circulation. 2008;118(8):808–817.
6.
DiasNVSonessonBKristmundssonT, et al. Short-term outcome of spinal cord ischemia after endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;49(4):403–409.
7.
EtzDCLuehrMAspernKV, et al. Spinal cord ischemia in open and endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: new concepts. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2014;55(2)(suppl 1):159–168.
8.
EtzCDWeigangEHartertM, et al. Contemporary spinal cord protection during thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic surgery and endovascular aortic repair: a position paper of the vascular domain of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47(6):943–957.
9.
MirandaVSousaJMansilhaA.Spinal cord injury in endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: prevalence, risk factors and preventive strategies. Int Angiol. 2018;37(2):112–126.
10.
HeidemannFTsilimparisNRohlffsF, et al. Staged procedures for prevention of spinal cord ischemia in endovascular aortic surgery. Gefasschirurgie. 2018;23(suppl 2):39–45.
11.
KatsargyrisAOikonomouKKouvelosG, et al. Spinal cord ischemia after endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms with fenestrated and branched stent grafts. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62(6):1450–1456.
12.
O’CallaghanAMastracciTMEagletonMJ.Staged endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms limits incidence and severity of spinal cord ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(2):347–354.
13.
SpinellaGFinotelloAPisaFR, et al. Geometrical evaluation of aortic sac remodeling during two-step thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;67:43–51.
14.
BertoglioLKatsarouMLoschiD, et al. Elective multistaged endovascular repair of thoraco-abdominal aneurysms with fenestrated and branched endografts to mitigate spinal cord ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;59(4):565–576.
15.
YoussefMDegliseSSzopinskiP, et al. A multicenter experience with a new fenestrated-branched device for endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Endovasc Ther. 2018;25(2):209–219.
16.
JayiaPConstantinouJHamiltonH, et al. Temporary perfusion branches to decrease spinal cord ischemia in the endovascular treatment of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms: based on a presentation at the 2013 VEITH Symposium, November 19-23, 2013 (New York, NY, USA). Aorta (Stamford). 2015;3(2):56–60.
17.
GallittoEFaggioliGPiniR, et al. Endovascular repair of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms by fenestrated and branched endografts†. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;56(5):993–1000.
18.
CzernyMEggebrechtHSodeckG, et al. Mechanisms of symptomatic spinal cord ischemia after TEVAR: insights from the European Registry of Endovascular Aortic Repair Complications (EuREC). J Endovasc Ther. 2012;19(1):37–43.
19.
KeyhaniKMillerCCEstreraAL, et al. Analysis of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials during thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49(1):36–41.
20.
LiberatiAAltmanDGTetzlaffJ, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.
21.
GallisKKasprzakPMCucuruzB, et al. Evaluation of visible spinal arteries on computed tomography angiography before and after branched stent graft repair for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65(6):1577–1583.
22.
SpanosKKölbelTKubitzJC, et al. Risk of spinal cord ischemia after fenestrated or branched endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69(2):357–366.
23.
GallittoEGargiuloMFreyrieA, et al. Endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm in high-surgical risk patients: fenestrated and branched endografts. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017;40:170–177.
24.
EagletonMJFollansbeeMWolskiK, et al. Fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair outcomes for type II and III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63(4):930–942.
25.
IafrancescoMRanasingheAMClaridgeMW, et al. Current results of endovascular repair of thoraco-abdominal aneurysms. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;46(6):981–984; discussion 984.
26.
BabaTOhkiTKanaokaY, et al. Clinical Outcomes of Spinal Cord Ischemia after Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Stent Grafting during Total Endovascular Aortic Repair for Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017;44:146–157.
27.
GuillouMBianchiniASobocinskiJ, et al. Endovascular treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2012;56(1):65–73.
28.
SpanosKKölbelTTheodorakopoulouM, et al. Early outcomes of the t-branch off-the-shelf multibranched stent-graft in urgent thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2018;25(1):31–39.
29.
VerhoevenELGKatsargyrisABekkemaF, et al. Editor’s choice—ten-year experience with endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: results from 166 consecutive patients. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;49(5):524–531.
30.
JuszczakMTVezzosiMKhanM, et al. Endovascular repair of acute juxtarenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms with surgeon-modified fenestrated endografts. J Vasc Surg. 2020;72(2):435–444.
31.
ReillyLMRappJHGrenonSM, et al. Efficacy and durability of endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair using the caudally directed cuff technique. J Vasc Surg. 2012;56(1):53–63; discussion 63–64.
32.
RossiSHPatelASahaP, et al. Neuroprotective strategies can prevent permanent paraplegia in the majority of patients who develop spinal cord ischaemia after endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;50(5):599–607.
33.
PasqualucciAAl-SibaieAVaidyanKPT, et al. Epidural corticosteroids, lumbar spinal drainage, and selective hemodynamic control for the prevention of spinal cord ischemia in thoracoabdominal endovascular aortic repair: a new clinical protocol. Adv Ther. 2020;37(1):272–287.
34.
ChangCKChuterTAMReillyLM, et al. Spinal arterial anatomy and risk factors for lower extremity weakness following endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair with branched stent-grafts. J Endovasc Ther. 2008;15(3):356–362.
35.
AndersonJLAdamDJBerceM, et al. Repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms with fenestrated and branched endovascular stent grafts. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42(4):600–607.
36.
WoloskerNFioranelliAFerreiraM, et al. Endovascular repair of ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm with an off-the-shelf endoprosthesis. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017;43:312.e1–312.e4.
37.
TenorioEROderichGSFarberMA, et al. Outcomes of endovascular repair of chronic postdissection compared with degenerative thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms using fenestrated-branched stent grafts. J Vasc Surg. 2020;72(3):822–836.
38.
BafortCAstarciPGoffetteP, et al. Predicting spinal cord ischemia before endovascular thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair: monitoring somatosensory evoked potentials. J Endovasc Ther. 2002;9(3):289–294.
39.
GallittoEFaggioliGPiniR, et al. Total endovascular repair of contained ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019;58:211–221.
40.
LioupisCCorriveauMMMackenzieKS, et al. Paraplegia prevention branches: a new adjunct for preventing or treating spinal cord injury after endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54(1):252–257.
41.
GallittoEFaggioliGMascoliC, et al. Impact of previous open aortic repair on the outcome of thoracoabdominal fenestrated and branched endografts. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68(6):1667–1675.
42.
PiffarettiGFontanaFFranchinM, et al. Total endovascular treatment for extent type 1 and 5 thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;154(5):1487–1496.
43.
SilingardiRGennaiSLeoneN, et al. Standard “off-the-shelf” multibranched thoracoabdominal endograft in urgent and elective patients with single and staged procedures in a multicenter experience. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67(4):1005–1016.
44.
GallittoEGargiuloMFreyrieA, et al. Off-the-shelf multibranched endograft for urgent endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66(3):696–704.
45.
ReillyLMChuterTAM. Reversal of fortune: induced endoleak to resolve neurological deficit after endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. J Endovasc Ther. 2010;17(1):21–29.
46.
HaulonSD’EliaPO’BrienN, et al. Endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;39(2):171–178.
47.
LiuDZhangHLiuB, et al. Combination of octopus and periscope techniques for the management of visceral branches from type v thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm: a case report. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2018;52(8):658–662.
48.
JorgensenBDMalekMVandenHullA, et al. A novel physician-assembled endograft for the repair of pararenal, paravisceral, Crawford type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms, and aneurysms requiring treatment after prior repair. J Vasc Surg. 2020;72(6):1897–1905.
49.
BosiersMJBisdasTDonasKP, et al. Early experience with the first commercially available off-the-shelf multibranched endograft (t-branch) in the treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Endovasc Ther. 2013;20(6):719–725.
50.
EleshraAOderichGSSpanosK, et al. Short-term outcomes of the t-Branch off-the-shelf multibranched stent graft for reintervention after previous infrarenal aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2020;72(5):1558–1566.
51.
WangSKGutweinARGuptaAK, et al. Institutional experience with the Zenith Fenestrated aortic stent graft. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68(2):331–336.
52.
ScaliSTWatermanAFeezorRJ, et al. Treatment of acute visceral aortic pathology with fenestrated/branched endovascular repair in high-surgical-risk patients. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58(1):56–65.
53.
MottaFCrownerJRKalbaughCA, et al. Outcomes and complications after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70(1):15–22.
54.
BangaPVOderichGSReis de SouzaL, et al. Neuromonitoring, cerebrospinal fluid drainage, and selective use of iliofemoral conduits to minimize risk of spinal cord injury during complex endovascular aortic repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2016;23(1):139–149.
55.
GallittoESobocinskiJMascoliC, et al. Fenestrated and branched thoraco-abdominal endografting after previous open abdominal aortic repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;60(6):843–852.
56.
LindströmDKettunenHEngströmJ, et al. Outcome after fenestrated and branched repair of aortic aneurysms-device failures predict reintervention rates. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;66:142–151.
57.
MangialardiNLachatMEspositoA, et al. The “open branch” technique: a new way to prevent paraplegia after total endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysm. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87(4):773–780.
58.
OrricoMRoncheySSetacciC, et al. The “bare branch” for safe spinal cord ischemia prevention after total endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69(6):1655–1663.
BignamiEDi LecceMBaciarelloM, et al. Direct intraoperative neurologic assessment to monitor spinal cord ischemia during thoracoabdominal aneurysm endovascular repair. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019;33(10):2775–2780.
61.
ToumaJBenamaraBKobeiterH, et al. Decision to interrupt second-stage side-branch completion in thoracoabdominal branched aortic stent grafting to prevent spinal cord ischemia. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017;42:303.e1–303.e4.
62.
AmrGSobocinskiJKoussaM, et al. Staged procedure to prevent major adverse events in extensive aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57(6):1671–1673.
63.
BaumgartnerIHirschATAbolaMTB, et al. Cardiovascular risk profile and outcome of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm in out-patients with atherothrombosis: data from the Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) Registry. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48(4):808–814.
