Abstract
Purpose
Aortic dissection (AD) is a catastrophic disease with complex hemodynamic conditions, however, understandings regarding its perfusion characteristics were not sufficient. In this study, a mock circulation loop (MCL) that integrated the Windkessel element and patient-specific silicone aortic phantoms was proposed to reproduce the aortic flow environment in vitro.
Materials and Methods
Patient-specific normal and dissected aortic phantoms with 12 branching vessels were established and embedded into this MCL. Velocities for aortic branches based on 20 healthy volunteers were regarded as the standardized data for flow division. By altering boundary conditions, the proposed MCL could mimic normal resting and left-sided heart failure (LHF) conditions. Flow rates and pressure status of the aortic branches could be quantified by separate sensors.
Results
In normal resting condition, the simulated heart rate and systemic flow rate were 60 bpm and 4.85 L/minute, respectively. For the LHF condition, the systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 75.94±0.77 mmHg and 57.65±0.35 mmHg, respectively. By tuning the vascular compliance and peripheral resistance, the flow distribution ratio (FDR) of each aortic branch was validated by the standardized data in the normal aortic phantom (mean difference 2.4%±1.70%). By comparing between the normal and dissected aortic models under resting condition, our results indicated that the AD model presented higher systolic (117.82±0.60 vs 108.75±2.26 mmHg) and diastolic (72.38±0.58 vs 70.46±2.33 mmHg) pressures, the time-average velocity in the true lumen (TL; 36.95 cm/s) was higher than that in the false lumen (FL; 22.95 cm/s), and the blood transport direction between the TL and FL varied in different re-entries.
Conclusions
The proposed MCL could be applied as a research tool for in vitro hemodynamic analysis of the aorta diseases under various physical conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
