Impact of Thoracic Endografting on the Hemodynamics of the Native Aorta: Pre- and Postoperative Assessments of Wall Shear Stress and Vorticity Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2021
Impact of Thoracic Endografting on the Hemodynamics of the Native Aorta: Pre- and Postoperative Assessments of Wall Shear Stress and Vorticity Using Computational Fluid Dynamics
To quantify the hemodynamic consequences of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) by comparing the preoperative and postoperative wall shear stress (WSS) and vorticity profiles on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations.
Materials and Methods
The pre- and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans from 20 consecutive patients (median age 69 years, range 20–87) treated for different thoracic aortic pathologies (11 aneurysms, 5 false aneurysms, 3 penetrating ulcers, and 1 traumatic aortic rupture) were segmented to construct patient-specific CFD models using a meshless code. The simulations were run over the cardiac cycle, and the WSS and vorticity values measured at the proximal and distal landing zones were compared.
Results
The CFD runs provided 4-dimensional simulations of blood flow in all patients. WSS and vorticity profiles at the proximal landing zone (located in zones 0–3 in 15 patients) varied in 18 and 20 of the cases, respectively; WSS was increased in 11 cases and the vorticity in 9. Pre- and postoperative WSS median values were 4.19 and 4.90 Pa, respectively. Vorticity median values were 40.38 and 39.17 Hz, respectively.
Conclusion
TEVAR induces functional alterations in the native thoracic aorta, though the prognostic significance of these changes is still unknown. CFD appears to be a valuable tool to explore aortic hemodynamics, and its application in a larger series would help define a predictive role for these hemodynamic assessments.
DakeMDKatoNMitchellRS, et al. Endovascular stent-graft placement for the treatment of acute aortic dissection. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1546–1552.
2.
DakeMDMillerDCSembaCP, et al. Transluminal placement of endovascular stent-grafts for the treatment of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1729–1734.
3.
GrabenwogerMAlfonsoFBachetJ, et al. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for the treatment of aortic diseases: a position statement from the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), in collaboration with the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42:17–24.
4.
HodgsonKJMatsumuraJSAscherE, et al. Clinical competence statement on thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR)—multispecialty consensus recommendations. A report of the SVS/SIR/SCAI/SVMB Writing Committee to develop a clinical competence standard for TEVAR. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:858–862.
5.
LeeWAMatsumuraJSMitchellRS, et al. Endovascular repair of traumatic thoracic aortic injury: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53:187–192.
6.
RoyDKauffmannCDelormeS, et al. A literature review of the numerical analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysms treated with endovascular stent grafts. Comput Math Methods Med. 2012;2012:820389.
7.
MolonyDSKavanaghEGMadhavanP, et al. A computational study of the magnitude and direction of migration forces in patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysm stent-grafts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40:332–339.
8.
CorbettTJCallananAMorrisLG, et al. A review of the in vivo and in vitro biomechanical behavior and performance of postoperative abdominal aortic aneurysms and implanted stent-grafts. J Endovasc Ther. 2008;15:468–484.
9.
FrauenfelderTLotfeyMBoehmT, et al. Computational fluid dynamics: hemodynamic changes in abdominal aortic aneurysm after stent-graft implantation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006;29:613–623.
10.
Marrocco-TrischittaMMvan BakelTMRomarowskiRM, et al. The modified arch landing areas nomenclature (MALAN) improves prediction of stent graft displacement forces: proof of concept by computational fluid dynamics modelling. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;55:584–592.
11.
Marrocco-TrischittaMMde BeaufortHWSecchiF, et al. A geometric reappraisal of proximal landing zones for thoracic endovascular aortic repair according to aortic arch types. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65:1584–1590.
12.
IshimaruS. Endografting of the aortic arch. J Endovasc Ther. 2004;11:II62–II71.
13.
MadhwalSRajagopalVBhattDL, et al. Predictors of difficult carotid stenting as determined by aortic arch angiography. J Invasive Cardiol. 2008;20:200–204.
14.
MidullaMMorenoRNegre-SalvayreA, et al. Impact of endografting on the thoracic aortic anatomy: comparative analysis of the aortic geometry before and after the endograft implantation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014;37:69–76.
15.
SethianJA. Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods: Evolving Interfaces in Computational Geometry, Fluid Mechanics, Computer Vision, and Materials Science. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
16.
UedaTTakaokaHRamanB, et al. Impact of quantitatively determined native thoracic aortic tortuosity on endoleak development after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:W1140–W1146.
17.
SternRHRasmussenH. Left ventricular ejection: model solution by collocation, an approximate analytical method. Comput Biol Med. 1996;26:255–261.
18.
MidullaMMorenoRBaaliA, et al. Hemodynamic imaging of thoracic stent-grafts by computational fluid dynamics (CFD): presentation of a patient-specific method combining magnetic resonance imaging and numerical simulations. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:2094–2102.
19.
PrasadAToLKGorrepatiML, et al. Computational analysis of stresses acting on intermodular junctions in thoracic aortic endografts. J Endovasc Ther. 2011;18:559–568.
20.
FigueroaCATaylorCAChiouAJ, et al. Magnitude and direction of pulsatile displacement forces acting on thoracic aortic endografts. J Endovasc Ther. 2009;16:350–358.
21.
FrohlichMMSuhGYBondessonJ, et al. Thoracic aortic geometry correlates with endograft bird-beaking severity. J Vasc Surg. Published online February5, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2019.11.045
22.
SzeDYvan den BoschMADakeMD, et al. Factors portending endoleak formation after thoracic aortic stent-graft repair of complicated aortic dissection. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2:105–112.
23.
UedaTFleischmannDDakeMD, et al. Incomplete endograft apposition to the aortic arch: bird-beak configuration increases risk of endoleak formation after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Radiology. 2010;255:645–652.
24.
van BogerijenGHAuricchioFContiM, et al. Aortic hemodynamics after thoracic endovascular aortic repair, with particular attention to the bird-beak configuration. J Endovasc Ther. 2014;21:791–802.
25.
Marrocco-TrischittaMMSpampinatoBMazzeoG, et al. Impact of the bird-beak configuration on postoperative outcome after thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a meta-analysis. J Endovasc Ther. 2019;26:771–778.
26.
ChengSWLamESFungGS, et al. A computational fluid dynamic study of stent-graft remodeling after endovascular repair of thoracic aortic dissections. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:303–310.
27.
FungGSLamSKChengSW, et al. On stent-graft models in thoracic aortic endovascular repair: a computational investigation of the hemodynamic factors. Comput Biol Med. 2008;38:484–489.
28.
SaberNRWoodNBGosmanAD, et al. Progress towards patient-specific computational flow modeling of the left heart via combination of magnetic resonance imaging with computational fluid dynamics. Ann Biomed Eng. 2003;31:42–52.
29.
RomarowskiRMLefieuxAMorgantiS, et al. Patient-specific CFD modelling in the thoracic aorta with PC-MRI-based boundary conditions: a least-square three-element Windkessel approach. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2018;34:e3134.
