KrajcerZWoodDAStrickmanN, et al. Pivotal clinical study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the MANTA vascular closure device during percutaneous EVAR and TEVAR procedures. J Endovasc Ther. 2020;27:414–420.
2.
GuptaAFouadLBasirM, et al. Safety and effectiveness of MANTA vascular closure device after large-bore mechanical circulatory support: real-world experience [published online April 4, 2020]. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. doi:10.1016/j.carrev.2020.03.032
3.
WoodDAKrajcerZSathananthanJ, et al. Pivotal clinical study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the MANTA percutaneous vascular closure device. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:e007258.
4.
ChaudhuriA.Femoral arterial haemostasis using an anchored collagen plug after percutaneous EVAR with an ultra-low profile device: prospective audit of an evolving “post-close” technique. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;54:241–246.
5.
ChaudhuriA.Prospective audit of “post-close” haemostasis following large bore femoral arterial punctures: a second look at the double Angio-Seal technique. EJVES Short Rep. 2018;40:12–14.
6.
LatsiosGToutouzasKKaranasosA, et al. Trans-femoral TAVI: Successful hemostasis of a totally calcified femoral artery (“calcium tube”) with the Manta(c) device [published online May 7, 2020]. Hellenic J Cardiol. doi:10.1016/j.hjc.2020.04.011
7.
SharmaRKPoulinMFTamez-AguilarH, et al. Post hoc closure of large bore vascular access using the MANTA closure device [published online April 9, 2020]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. doi:10.1002/ccd.28900
