ShammasNWShammasWJJones-MillerS, et al. Optimal vessel sizing and understanding dissections in infrapopliteal interventions: data from the iDissection below the knee study. J Endovasc Ther. 2020;27(4):575–580.
2.
PliagasGSaabFStavroulakisK, et al. Intravascular ultrasound imaging versus digital subtraction angiography in patients with peripheral vascular disease. J Invasive Cardiol. 2020;32:99–103.
3.
AbualhinMGargiuloMBianchini MassoniC, et al. A prognostic score for clinical success after revascularization of critical limb ischemia in hemodialysis patients. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70:901–912.
4.
TangQHChenJHuCF, et al. Comparison between endovascular and open surgery for the treatment of peripheral artery diseases: a meta-analysis. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;62:484–495.
5.
KatsanosKKitrouPSpiliopoulosS, et al. Comparative effectiveness of plain balloon angioplasty, bare metal stents, drug-coated balloons, and drug-eluting stents for the treatment of infrapopliteal artery disease: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Endovasc Ther. 2016;23:851–863.
6.
AlmasriJAdusumalliJAsiN, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of revascularization outcomes of infrainguinal chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;58(1S):S110–S119.
7.
GargiuloMMaioliFCeccacciT, et al. What’s next after optimal infrapopliteal angioplasty? Clinical and ultrasonographic results of a prospective single-center study. J Endovasc Ther. 2008;15:363–369.
8.
SchmidtAUlrichMWinklerB, et al. Angiographic patency and clinical outcome after balloon-angioplasty for extensive infrapopliteal arterial disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;76:1047–1054.
9.
IpemaJHuizingESchreveMA, et al. Editor’s choice. Drug coated balloon angioplasty vs. standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in below the knee peripheral arterial disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;59:265–275.
10.
ShammasNWToreyJTShammasWJ, et al. Intravascular ultrasound assessment and correlation with angiographic findings demonstrating femoropopliteal arterial dissections post atherectomy: results from the iDissection Study. J Invasive Cardiol. 2018;30:240–244.
11.
ShammasNWRadaidehQShammasWJ, et al. The role of precise imaging with intravascular ultrasound in coronary and peripheral interventions. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2019;15:283–290.
12.
HiramoriSSogaYIidaO, et al. Relationship between clinical outcomes and vessel size in endovascular therapy for femoropopliteal lesions. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65:1690–1697.
13.
GargiuloMGiovanettiFBianchini MassoniC, et al. Bypass to the ankle and foot in the era of endovascular therapy of tibial disease. Results and factors influencing the outcome. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2014;55:367–374.
14.
AbualhinMSonettoAFaggioliG, et al. Outcomes of duplex-guided paramalleolar and inframalleolar bypass in patients with critical limb ischemia. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018;53:154–164.
15.
TepeGZellerTSchnorrB, et al. High-grade, non-flow-limiting dissections do not negatively impact long-term outcome after paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty: an additional analysis from the THUNDER study. J Endovasc Ther. 2013;20:792–800.
16.
BrodmannMWissgottCHoldenA, et al. Treatment of infra-popliteal post-PTA dissection with tack implants: 12-month results from the TOBA-BTK study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;92:96–105.
17.
StoneGWMaeharaALanskyAJ, et al. A prospective natural history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:226–235.
18.
PanaichSSAroraSPatelN, et al. Intravascular ultrasound in lower extremity peripheral vascular interventions: variation in utilization and impact on in-hospital outcomes from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2006-2011). J Endovasc Ther. 2016;23:65–75.
19.
SridharanNDBoitetASmithK, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of drug-coated therapies in the superficial femoral artery. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67:343–352.
20.
KatsanosKGeislerBPGarnerAM, et al. Economic analysis of endovascular drug-eluting treatments for femoropopliteal artery disease in the UK. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e011245.
