VolodosNL. The first steps in endovascular aortic repair: how it all began. J Endovasc Ther. 2013;20(suppl);I-3–I-23.
2.
ParodiJCPalmazJCBaroneHD. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 1991;5:491–499.
3.
GreenhalghRMBrownLCPowellJT, et al; United Kingdom EVAR Trial Investigators. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1863–1871.
4.
IMPROVE Trial Investigators. Comparative clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of endovascular strategy vs open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: three year results of the IMPROVE randomised trial. BMJ. 2017;359:j4859.
5.
BoyleJRThompsonMM. Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is less invasive, now we must prove its efficacy. J Endovasc Ther. 2003;10:16–19.
6.
CollinJMurieJA. Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a failed experiment. Br J Surg. 2001;88:1281–1282.
7.
VerziniFIserniaGDe RangoP, et al. Abdominal aortic endografting beyond the trials: a 15-year single-center experience comparing newer to older generation stent-grafts. J Endovasc Ther. 2014;21:439–447.
8.
DuaAKuySLeeCJ, et al. Epidemiology of aortic aneurysm repair in the United States from 2000 to 2010. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59:1512–1517.
9.
PatelRSweetingMJPowellJT, et al; EVAR Trial Investigators. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years’ follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388:2366–2374.
10.
JohalASLoftusIMBoyleJR, et al. Long-term survival after endovascular and open repair of unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in England between 2006 and 2015: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Surg. 2019. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11215.
11.
WanhainenAVerziniFVan HerzeeleI, et al. Editor’s choice. European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57:8–93.
12.
KrievinsDKHoldenASavlovskisJ, et al. EVAR using the Nellix sac-anchoring endoprosthesis: treatment of favourable and adverse anatomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;42:38–46.
13.
CarpenterJPCuffRBuckleyC, et al; Nellix Investigators. One-year pivotal trial outcomes of the Nellix system for endovascular aneurysm sealing. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65:330–336.e4.
14.
BöcklerDHoldenAThompsonM, et al. Multicenter Nellix EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing system experience in aneurysm sac sealing. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62:290–298.
15.
ThompsonMMHeyligersJMHayesPD, et al, for the EVAS FORWARD Global Registry Investigators. Endovascular aneurysm sealing: early and midterm results from the EVAS FORWARD Global Registry. J Endovasc Ther. 2016;23:685–692.
16.
AntoniouGASeniorYIazzolinoL, et al. Endovascular aneurysm sealing is associated with reduced radiation exposure and procedure time compared with standard endovascular aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2016;23:285–289.
17.
OckertSHeinrichMKaufmannT, et al. Endovascular aortic sealing with Nellix reduces intraoperative radiation dose when compared to endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67:1068–1073.
18.
CarpenterJPLaneJS3rdTraniJ, et al; Nellix Investigators. Refinement of anatomic indications for the Nellix System for endovascular aneurysm sealing based on 2-year outcomes from the EVAS FORWARD IDE trial. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68:720–730.e1.
19.
HarrisonSCWinterbottomAJCoughlinPA, et al. Editor’s choice. Mid-term migration and device failure following endovascular aneurysm sealing with the Nellix stent graft system—a single centre experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;56:342–348.
20.
van NoortKBoersenJTZoethoutAC, et al; DEVASS (Dutch Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing Study) Group. Anatomical predictors of endoleaks or migration after endovascular aneurysm sealing. J Endovasc Ther. 2018;25:719–725.
21.
YafawiAMcWilliamsRGFisherRK, et al. Stent frame movement following endovascular aneurysm sealing in the abdominal aorta. J Endovasc Ther. 2019;26:54–61.
22.
ArganiLPTorellaFFisherRK, et al. Deformation and dynamic response of abdominal aortic aneurysm sealing. Sci Rep. 2017;7:17712.
23.
StensonKMde BruinJLLoftusIM, et al. Migration and sac expansion as modes of midterm therapeutic failure after endovascular aneurysm sealing: 295 cases at a single center [published online August 9, 2019]. J Vasc Surg. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2019.04.482
24.
VarshneySKellyJJBranaganG, et al. Angelchik prosthesis revisited. World J Surg. 2002;26:129–133.
25.
BoyleJR. Is in hospital mortality following EVAR still a valid outcome measure? [Comment]Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57:520.
26.
SmithAJDieppePHowardPW, et al. Failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Lancet. 2012;380:1759–1766.
