DiasNVRivaLIvancevK, et al. Is there a benefit of frequent CT follow-up after EVAR?Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37:425–430.
2.
NordonIMKarthikesalingamAHinchliffeRJ, et al. Secondary interventions following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and the enduring value of graft surveillance. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;39:547–554.
3.
SchanzerAMessinaLMGhoshK, et al. Follow-up compliance after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Medicare beneficiaries. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:16–22.
4.
HicksCWZarkowskyDBostockIC, et al. Endovascular aneurysm repair patients who are lost to follow-up have worse outcomes. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65:1625–1635.
5.
GoudekettingSRSchuurmannRCLSlumpCH, et al. Changes in apposition of endograft limbs in the iliac arteries after endovascular aneurysm repair: determination with new computed tomography–applied software. J Endovasc Ther. 2019;26(6):843–852.
6.
SchuurmannRCLOvereemSPvan NoortK, et al. Validation of a new methodology to determine 3-dimensional endograft apposition, position, and expansion in the aortic neck after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2018;25:358–365.
7.
Bastos GonçalvesFHoeksSEHendriksJM, et al. Adequate seal and no endoleak on the first postoperative computed tomography angiography as criteria for no additional imaging up to 5 years after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57:1503–1511.
8.
Bastos GonçalvesFvan RijnMJUlteeKL, et al. Iliac seal zone dynamics and clinical consequences after endovascular aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;53:185–192.
9.
RoosHTokarevMChernorayV, et al. Displacement forces in stent grafts: influence of diameter variation and curvature asymmetry. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;52:150–156.
