You Can but Should You? Alternatives When Embolic Protection Is Difficult in Carotid Stenting

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Garriboli

Pruner

Miccoli

et al . Carotid artery stenting without embolic protection device: a single-center experience. J Endovasc Ther. 2019;26:121–127.

Barbato

Dillavou

Horowitz

et al . A randomized trial of carotid artery stenting with and without cerebral protection. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:760–765.

Cho

Kim

Lim

et al . Protected versus unprotected carotid artery stenting: meta-analysis of the current literature. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2018;61:458–466.

Montorsi

Galli

Ravagnani

et al . Carotid artery stenting with proximal embolic protection via a transradial or transbrachial approach: pushing the boundaries of the technique while maintaining safety and efficacy. J Endovasc Ther. 2016;23:549–560.

Texakalidis

Letsos

Kokkinidis

et al . Proximal embolic protection versus distal filter protection versus combined protection in carotid artery stenting: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018;19(5 Pt A):545–552.

Patel

Mhatre

Heuser

RR.

Suck-U-Surge: Another alternative for embolic protection. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:2546–2547.

Montorsi

Galli

Ravagnani

et al . Carotid artery stenting in patients with left ICA stenosis and bovine aortic arch: a single-center experience in 60 consecutive patients treated via the right radial or brachial approach. J Endovasc Ther. 2014;21:127–136.