Purpose: To evaluate the safety and integrity of a new stent-graft as a potential bridging device in fenestrated stent-grafts using an in vitro fenestrated model. Materials and Methods: Polyester test sheets with ten 6-mm- or 8-mm-diameter fenestrations were used to simulate a fenestrated main body endoprosthesis. In total, 50 Viabahn balloon-expandable (VBX) stent-grafts of varying lengths (29 and 39 mm) and diameters (6, 7, and 8 mm) were implanted in the fitting fenestrations. After release, the 6- and 7-mm-diameter stent-grafts were flared with a 10×20-mm angioplasty balloon; a 12×20-mm balloon was used in the 8-mm-diameter devices. Safety of the devices was defined as absence of fractures detected on radiography or computed tomography (CT), as well as material failure detected by microscopy and water permeability testing. The forces (in Newtons, N) needed for perpendicular dislocation (pullout force) and axial dislocation (shear stress force) were also evaluated. Results: Forty VBX stent-grafts were subjected to digital radiographic imaging and multiplanar CT. None showed any stent fracture. Subsequent microscopy indicated no damage to the fabric or separation of the graft after flaring. Ten VBX stent-grafts underwent water permeability testing after flaring; no water passed through the graft wall during a 10-minute period under an intraluminal pressure at 120 mm Hg. Testing of 25 VBX stent-grafts revealed initial pullout forces between 11.3 and 31 N. Shear stress tests showed that the average force needed to dislocate the stent-grafts by 50% of their diameter ranged between 5.75 and 6.91 N (mean 6.1±0.5 N) for the 6-mm stents and between 3.31 and 5.4 N (mean 4.4±0.8) for the 8-mm stents. Conclusion: This preliminary study demonstrated the applicability of the VBX as a bridging stent-graft in a simulated fenestration model. A comparison with other stent-grafts and clinical assessment are required.
MastracciTMEagletonMJKuramochiYet al. Twelve-year results of fenestrated endografts for juxtarenal and group IV thoracoabdominal aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:355–364.
2.
AmiotSHaulonSBecqueminJPet al; Association Universitaire de Recherche en Chirurgie Vasculaire. Fenestrated endovascular grafting: the French multicenter experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;39:537–544.
3.
MastracciTMGreenbergRKEagletonMJet al. Durability of branches in branched and fenestrated endografts. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57:926–933.
4.
OderichGSRibeiroMde SouzaLR.Endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms using fenestrated and branched endografts. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153:S32–S41.e7.
5.
OderichGSRibeiroMHoferJet al. Prospective, nonrandomized study to evaluate endovascular repair of pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms using fenestrated-branched endografts based on supraceliac sealing zones. J Vasc Surg. 2017;65:1249–1259.
6.
MastracciTMCarrellTConstantinouJet al. Effect of branch stent choice on branch-related outcomes in complex aortic repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;51:536–542.
7.
SpearRSobocinskiJHertaultAet al. One year outcomes of 101 BeGraft stent grafts used as bridging stents in fenestrated endovascular repairs. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;55:504–510.
8.
CrawfordSAItkinaMDoyleMG.Structural implications of fenestrated stent graft misalignment. Surgeon. 2018;16:89–93.
ScurrJRHHowTVMcWilliamsRGet al. Fenestrated stent-graft repair: which stent should be used to secure target vessel fenestrations?J Endovasc Ther. 2008;15:344–348.
ScurrJRHMcWilliamsRGHowTV. How secure is the anastomosis between the proximal and distal body components of a fenestrated stent-graft?Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;44:281–286.
13.
CinàDPGrantGPetersonMet al. A study of pullout forces of the components of modular multi-manufacturer hybrid endografts used for aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Surg. 2009;37:671–680.
14.
BosmanWMPFSteenhovenTJSuarezDRet al. The proximal fixation strength of modern EVAR grafts in a short aneurysm neck. An in vitro study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;39:187–192.
