Short-term Outcome of Straight vs Tapered Carotid Stenting for Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Prospective Study

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the short-term outcomes and complications of straight vs tapered carotid stent placement for patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. Methods: A prospective study was conducted to examine if tapered carotid stents (TCS) performed better than straight carotid stents (SCS) in terms of complications and outcomes in patients with a unilateral, symptomatic, internal carotid artery stenosis ⩾70%. Between January 2014 and January 2016, 236 patients were screened; 88 were excluded, leaving 148 patients for 1:1 randomization to carotid artery stenting with either SCS or TCS. The data were analyzed for differences between the groups in terms of complications (hemodynamic depression, cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome, puncture site sequelae) and endpoint events (stroke, myocardial infarction, and death) at 30 days and 6 months. Results: Two patients in the TCS group underwent endarterectomy after allocation, leaving 72 patients (mean age 65.1±8.8 years; 59 men) in the TCS group for analysis vs 74 (mean age 65.0±7.9 years; 58 men) in the SCS group. The technical success was 100% in both groups. The incidence of hemodynamic depression (hypotension and bradycardia) after the procedures were higher in the SCS group (p=0.04), and the patients who underwent SCS procedures had longer hospital stays (p=0.01). There was no difference in the incidences of complications, myocardial infarction, mortality, or stroke at 30 days or 6 months between the SCS and TCS groups. The rates of restenosis (4% SCS vs 1% TCS) were similar (p=0.63); all restenoses were moderate (50%–70%). Conclusion: When compared to straight stents, tapered carotid stents significantly decreased hemodynamic complications and hospital stay.