PalmazJC.Bring that pioneering spirit back! A 25-year perspective on the vascular stent. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007;30:1095–1098.
2.
PalmazJC.Intravascular stents in the last and the next 10 years. J Endovasc Ther. 2004;11(suppl II):II-200–II-206.
3.
SpragueEAPalmazJC.A model system to assess key vascular responses to biomaterials. J Endovasc Ther. 2005;12:594–604.
4.
PalmazJCBensonASpragueEA.Influence of surface topography on endothelialization of intravascular metallic material. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;10:439–444.
5.
SpragueEATioFAhmedSHet alImpact of parallel micro-engineered stent grooves on endothelial cell migration, proliferation, and function: an in vivo correlation study of the healing response in the coronary swine model. Circ Cardiovasc Interv2012;5:499–507.
6.
VesgaBHernandezHHuigueraSet alBiological effect of microengineered grooved stents on strut healing: a randomized OCT-based comparative study in humans. Open Heart. 2017;4:e000521.
7.
MosesJWLeonMBPopmaJJet al; SIRIUS Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1315–1323.
8.
BønaaKHMannsverkJWisethRet al; NORSTENT Investigators. Drug-eluting or bare-metal stents for coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1242–1252.
9.
HeubleinBRohdeRKoeseVet alBiocorrosion of magnesium alloys: a new principle in cardiovascular technology?Heart. 2003;89:651–656.
10.
TamaiHIgakiKTsujiTet alA biodegradable poly-l-lactic acid coronary stent in the porcine coronary artery. J Interv Cardiol. 1999;12:443–449.
11.
TamaiHIgakiKKosugaKet alInitial and 6-month results of biodegradable poly-l-lactic acid coronary stents in humans. Circulation. 2000;102:399–404.
12.
SerruysPWChevalierBDudekDet alA bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold versus a metallic everolimus-eluting stent for ischaemic heart disease caused by de-novo native coronary artery lesions (ABSORB II): an interim 1-year analysis of clinical and procedural secondary outcomes from a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385:43–54.
13.
SerruysPWChevalierBSotomiYet alComparison of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold with an everolimus-eluting metallic stent for the treatment of coronary artery stenosis (ABSORB II): a 3 year, randomised, controlled, single-blind, multicentre clinical trial. Lancet. 2016;388:2479–2491.
14.
SorrentinoSGiustinoGMehranRet alEverolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:3055–3066.
15.
IppolitiE, ed. Heuristic Reasoning: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics. Switzerland: Springer International; 2015.
16.
MakkarRRFontanaGSøndergaardL.Possible subclinical leaflet thrombosis in bioprosthetic aortic valves. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1591–1592.
17.
MajorAGuidoinRSoulezGet alImplant degradation and poor healing after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: an analysis of explanted stent-grafts. J Endovasc Ther. 2006;13:457–467.
18.
IshiharaTIidaOInoueKet alHistological evaluation of a self-expanding stent-graft 23 months after implantation in the superficial femoral artery. J Endovasc Ther. 2017;24:746–750.
19.
GuidoinRMaroisYDouvilleYet alFirst-generation aortic endografts: analysis of explanted Stentor devices from the EUROSTAR registry. J Endovasc Ther. 2000;7:105–122.
20.
CaoPDe RangoPVerziniFet alEndoleak after endovascular aortic repair: classification, diagnosis and management following endovascular thoracic and abdominal aortic repair. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2010;51:53–69.
21.
PalmazJCBaileySMartonDet alInfluence of stent design and material composition on procedure outcome. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36:1031–1039.
22.
KasemoBLausmaaJ.Biomaterial and implant surfaces: On the role of cleanliness, contamination and preparation procedures. J Biomed Mater Res. 1988;22(A2 suppl):145–158.
23.
PalmazJC.Tissue-stent interactions and design considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;160:613–618.
24.
GuidoinRZhangZDouvilleYet alCommentary: Nitinol stent designs need to adhere to the 3Bs: biofunctionality, biodurability, and biocompatibility. J Endovasc Ther. 2014;21:240–242.