VolodosNLShekhaninVEKarpovichIPA self-fixing synthetic blood vessel endoprosthesis [in Russian]. Vestn Khir Im I I Grek. 1986;137(11):123–125.
2.
PrinssenMVerhoevenELButhJA randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1607–1618.
3.
SachsTSchermerhornMPomposelliFResident and fellow experiences after the introduction of endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:881–888.
4.
PowellJTSweetingMJUlugP; EVAR-1, DREAM, OVER and ACE Trialists. Meta-analysis of individual-patient data from EVAR-1, DREAM, OVER and ACE trials comparing outcomes of endovascular or open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm over 5 years. Br J Surg. 2017;104:166–178.
5.
PatelRSweetingMJPowellJT; EVAR trial investigators. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm in 15-years’ follow-up of the UK endovascular aneurysm repair trial 1 (EVAR trial 1): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388:2366–2374.
6.
VeithFJBaumRAOhkiT, et al.Nature and significance of endoleaks and endotension: summary of opinions expressed at an international conference. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:1029–1038.
7.
ZarinsCKBlochDACrabtreeTStent graft migration after endovascular aneurysm repair: importance of proximal fixation. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:1264–1272.
8.
MoulakakisKGDalainasIMylonasSConversion to open repair after endografting for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a review of causes, incidence, results, and surgical techniques of reconstruction. J Endovasc Ther. 2010;17:694–702.
9.
BecqueminJPPilletJCLescalieF; ACE trialists. A randomized controlled trial of endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms in low- to moderate-risk patients. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53:1167–1173.
10.
HoboRKievitJLeursLJInfluence of severe infrarenal aortic neck angulation on complications at the proximal neck following endovascular AAA repair: a EUROSTAR study. J Endovasc Ther. 2007;14:1–11.
11.
LeursLJKievitJDagneliePCInfluence of infrarenal neck length on outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2006;13:640–648.
12.
AbuRahmaAFCampbellJEMousaAYClinical outcomes for hostile versus favorable aortic neck anatomy in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair using modular devices. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:13–21.
13.
GitlitzDBRamaswamiGKaplanDEndovascular stent-grafting in the presence of aortic neck filling defects: early clinical experience. J Vasc Surg. 2001;33:340–344.
14.
GreenbergRFairmanRSrivastavaSEndovascular grafting in patients with short proximal necks: an analysis of short-term results. Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;8:350–354.
15.
LeeJTUlleryBWZarinsCKEVAR deployment in anatomically challenging necks outside the IFU. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013;46:65–73.
16.
SchuurmannRCKusterLSlumpCHAortic curvature instead of angulation allows improved estimation of the true aorto-iliac trajectory. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;51:216–224.
17.
SchuurmannRCOurielKMuhsBEAortic curvature as a predictor of intraoperative type Ia endoleak. J Vasc Surg. 2016;63:596–602.
18.
SchuurmannRCvan NoortKOvereemSPAortic curvature is a predictor of late type Ia endoleak and migration after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2017;24:411–417.
19.
WaasdorpEJGorrepatiMLRafiiBYSideways displacement of the endograft within the aneurysm sac is associated with late adverse events after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55:947–955.
