AdamDJBeardJDClevelandT. Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:1925–1934.
2.
GoodneyPPBeckAWNagleJ. National trends in lower extremity bypass surgery, endovascular interventions, and major amputations. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50:54–60.
3.
HynesNMahendranBManningB. The influence of subintimal angioplasty on level of amputation and limb salvage rates in lower limb critical ischaemia: a 15-year experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;30:291–299.
4.
SchillingerMSabetiSDickP. Sustained benefit at 2 years of primary femoropopliteal stenting compared with balloon angioplasty with optional stenting. Circulation. 2007;115:2745–2749.
5.
RyerEJTrocciolaSMDeRubertisB. Analysis of outcomes following failed endovascular treatment of chronic limb ischemia. Ann Vasc Surg. 2006;20:440–446.
6.
BradburyAWAdamDJBellJ. Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial: analysis of amputation free and overall survival by treatment received. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51:18S–31S.
7.
UekiCSakaguchiGAkimotoT. Influence of previous percutaneous coronary intervention on clinical outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;20:531–537.
8.
NolanBWDe MartinoRRStoneD; for the Vascular Study Group of New England. Prior failed ipsilateral percutaneous endovascular intervention in patients with critical limb ischemia predicts poor outcome after lower extremity bypass. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:730–736.
9.
JonesDWSchanzerAZhaoYfor the Vascular Study Group of New England. Growing impact of restenosis on the surgical treatment of peripheral arterial disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2:e000345.
10.
NorgrenLHiattWRDormandyJA. Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg. 2007;45:S5A–S67A.
11.
RoyTLiuGQiX. MR characterization of peripheral arterial chronic total occlusions at 7 Tesla with microCT and histologic validation [abstract]. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015;17(suppl 1):P404.
RossR. Atherosclerosis—an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:115–126.
14.
StaryHCChandlerABDinsmoreRE. A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:1512–1531.
15.
FaggiottoARossR. Studies of hypercholesterolemia in the nonhuman primate. II. Fatty streak conversion to fibrous plaque. Arteriosclerosis. 1984;4:341–356.
16.
YokoyaKTakatsuHHosokawaH. Process of progression of coronary artery lesions from mild or moderate stenosis to moderate or severe stenosis: a study based on four serial coronary arteriograms per year. Circulation. 1999;100:903–909.
17.
FarbABurkeMDKolodgieFD. Pathological mechanisms of fatal late coronary stent thrombosis in humans. Circulation. 2003;108:1701–1706.
SubbotinVM. Analysis of arterial intimal hyperplasia: review and hypothesis. Theor Biol Med Model. 2007;4:41.
20.
VavraAKHavelkaGEMartinezJ. Insights into the effect of nitric oxide and its metabolites nitrite and nitrate at inhibiting neointimal hyperplasia. Nitric Oxide. 2011;25:22–30.
21.
WilcoxJN. Molecular biology: insight into the causes and prevention of restenosis after arterial intervention. Am J Cardiol. 1993;72:88E–95E.
22.
ClowesAWSchwartzSM. Significance of quiescent smooth muscle migration in the injured rat carotid artery. Circ Res. 1985;56:139–145.
23.
SataMMaejimaYAdachiF. A mouse model of vascular injury that induces rapid onset of medial cell apoptosis followed by reproducible neointimal hyperplasia. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2000;32:2097–2104.
24.
YonetsuTKakutaTLeeT. Assessment of acute injuries and chronic intimal thickening of the radial artery after transradial coronary intervention by optical coherence tomography. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:1608–1615.
25.
MargovskyAILordRSMeekAC. Artery wall damage and platelet uptake from so-called atraumatic arterial clamps: an experimental study. Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;5:42–47.
26.
JoelsCSYorkJWKalbaughCA. Surgical implications of early failed endovascular intervention of the superficial femoral artery. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:562–565.
27.
ScholzDCaiWSchaperW. Arteriogenesis, a new concept of vascular adaptation in occlusive disease. Angiogenesis. 2001;4:247–257.
28.
Van RoyenNPiekJJBuschmannI. Stimulation of arteriogenesis; a new concept for the treatment of arterial occlusive disease. Cardiovasc Res. 2001;49:543–553.
29.
SchaperWPasykS. Influence of collateral flow on the ischemic tolerance of the heart following acute and subacute coronary occlusion. Circulation. 1976;53:I57–I62.
30.
SchaperJKönigRFranzD. The endothelial surface of growing coronary collateral arteries. Intimal margination and diapedesis of monocytes. A combined SEM and TEM study. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol. 1976;370:193–205.
31.
HaJWChoSYChungN. Fate of collateral circulation after successful coronary angioplasty of total occlusion assessed by coronary angiography and myocardial contrast echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002;15:389–395.
32.
GruntzigAPyleRGoebelN. The fate of collaterals after PTCA. Circulation. 1980;62(suppl III):III-161.
33.
FujitaMNakeIFudoT. Fate of collateral vessels after successful coronary angioplasty in patients with effort angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:544–548.
34.
RutherfordRBBakerJDErnstC. Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version. J Vasc Surg. 1997;26:517–538.
35.
WuTYGieslerGHerscuG. Agreement among observers in the assignment of TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus classification and runoff score. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58:1254–1258.
JohnstonKW. Femoral and popliteal arteries: reanalysis of results of balloon angioplasty. Radiology. 1992;183:767–771.
38.
JamsenTSManninenHIJaakkolaPA. Long-term outcome of patients with claudication after balloon angioplasty of the femoropopliteal arteries. Radiology. 2002;225:345–352.
39.
ClarkTWGroffskyJLSoulenMC. Predictors of long-term patency after femoropopliteal angioplasty: results from the STAR Registry. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12:923–933.
40.
AscherEHingoraniAPMarksNA. Popliteal artery volume flow measurements: a new and reliable predictor of early patency after infrainguinal balloon angioplasty and subintimal dissection. J Vasc Surg. 2007;45:17–24.
41.
HiramoriSSogaYTomoiY. Impact of runoff grade after endovascular treatment for femoropopliteal lesions. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59:720–727.
42.
ConradMFCrawfordRSHackneyLA. Endovascular management of patients with critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53:1020–1025.
43.
DaviesMGSaadWEPedenEK. Impact of runoff on superficial femoral artery endoluminal interventions for rest pain and tissue loss. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:619–626.
44.
AlbackABiancariFSaarinenO. Prediction of the immediate outcome of femoropopliteal saphenous vein bypass by angiographic runoff score. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1998;15:220–224.
45.
BiancariFAlbackAIhlbergL. Angiographic runoff score as a predictor of outcome following femorocrural bypass surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1999;17:480–485.
46.
AscerEVeithFJWhite-FloresSA. Intra-operative outflow resistance as a predictor of late patency of femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal arterial bypasses. J Vasc Surg. 1987;5:820–827.
47.
AscerEWhiteSAVeithFJ. Outflow resistance measurement during infrainguinal arterial reconstructions: a reliable predictor of limb salvage. Am J Surg. 1987;154:185–188.
48.
HehrleinCChuangCHTuntelderJR. Effects of vascular runoff on myointimal hyperplasia after mechanical balloon or thermal laser arterial injury in dogs. Circulation. 1991;84:884–890.
49.
WardTJPiechowiakFLPatelRS. Revascularization for critical limb ischemia using the SpiderFX embolic protection device in the below-the-knee circulation: initial results. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014;25:1533–1538.
50.
DaviesMGBismuthJSaadWE. Implications of in situ thrombosis and distal embolization during superficial femoral artery endoluminal intervention. Ann Vasc Surg. 2010;24:14–22.
51.
KonigCWPusichBTepeG. Frequent embolization in peripheral angioplasty: detection with an embolism protection device (AngioGuard) and electron microscopy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2003;26:334–339.
52.
LamRCShahSFariesPL. Incidence and clinical significance of distal embolization during percutaneous interventions involving the superficial femoral artery. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46:1155–1159.
53.
ShammasNWCoinerDShammasGA. Distal embolic event protection using excimer laser ablation in peripheral vascular interventions: results of the DEEP EMBOLI registry. J Endovasc Ther. 2009;16:197–202.
54.
MendesBCOderichGSFlemingMD. Clinical significance of embolic events in patients undergoing endovascular femoropopliteal interventions with or without embolic protection devices. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59:359–367.
55.
GardinerGAJrMeyerovitzMFStokesKR. Complications of transluminal angioplasty. Radiology. 1986;159:201–208.
