Purpose: To review the literature on pararenal endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) to determine the frequency and clinical relevance of chimney graft occlusions. Methods: A comprehensive search of the English-language literature abstracted in the Medline and the Cochrane Library databases was performed to identify case series involving pararenal aortic pathologies (degenerative aneurysms, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers, type Ia endoleaks, and para-anastomotic aneurysms) treated with EVAR and chimney grafts; thoracoabdominal, iliac, or aortic arch chimney graft placements were excluded, as were case reports in which the total number of chimney grafts implanted at the reporting center could not be determined. The literature search identified 83 studies regarding chimneys/snorkels for pararenal pathologies published between January 2007 and March 2014. Of these, 7 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Results: There were 15 (4.5%) occlusions in the overall 334 renovisceral vessels in which chimney grafts were deployed. The mean time to chimney graft occlusion was 3.5 months (range 1–270 days) over a mean follow-up of 1.4 months (range 9–24). The target arteries were the renal artery (n=12) and the superior mesenteric artery (SMA; n=3). Seven patients were asymptomatic, and no description was given in 5 cases. In the other 3 patients, the symptoms were acute renal failure, intestinal ischemia, and malignant hypertension. The treatment strategy included open conversion and iliorenal bypass (n=1), exploratory laparotomy to revascularize the SMA (n=1), hemodialysis (n=1), placement of bare metal stents (n=4), conservative treatment (n=2), and unknown (n=6). One (6.7%) patient died (an occluded SMA). Two patients with renal chimney occlusion suffered from temporary renal function deterioration. Conclusion: The present analysis identified a low rate of chimney graft occlusions, which appear to occur generally a few months after placement. Involvement of the renal artery had no severe clinical consequences, while occlusion of the SMA can be associated with life-threatening complications. More detailed information regarding occluded chimney grafts will be needed in future publications to help identify the causes.
GreenbergRKClairDSrivastavaS. Should patients with challenging anatomy be offered endovascular aneurysm repair?J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:990–996.
2.
DonasKPTorselloGAustermannM. Use of abdominal chimney grafts is feasible and safe: short-term results. J Endovasc Ther. 2010;17:589–593.
3.
DonasKPTorselloGBisdasT. Early outcomes for fenestrated and chimney endografts in the treatment of pararenal aortic pathologies are not significantly different: a systematic review with pooled data analysis. J Endovasc Ther. 2012;19:723–728.
4.
OhrlanderTSonessonBIvancevK. The chimney graft: a technique for preserving or rescuing aortic branch vessels in stent-graft sealing zones. J Endovasc Ther. 2008;15:427–432.
5.
AllaqabandSJanMFBajwaT. “The chimney graft”-a simple technique for endovascular repair of complex juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms in no-option patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;75:1111–1115.
6.
DonasKPPecoraroFBisdasT. CT angiography at 24 months demonstrates durability of EVAR with the use of chimney grafts for pararenal aortic pathologies. J Endovasc Ther. 2013;20:1–6.
7.
DonasKPTorselloGBisdasT. Novel indication for chimney graft placement in the inferior mesenteric artery in AAA patients with coexistent bilateral internal iliac artery occlusion. J Endovasc Ther. 2014;21:548–552.
8.
LachatMVeithFJPfammatterT. Chimney and periscope grafts observed over 2 years after their use to revascularize 169 renovisceral branches in 77 patients with complex aortic aneurysms. J Endovasc Ther. 2013;20:597–605.
9.
CoscasRKobeiterHDesgrangesP. Technical aspects, current indications, and results of chimney grafts for juxtarenal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53:1520–1527.
10.
TolenaarJLZandvoortHJMollFL. Technical considerations and results of chimney grafts for the treatment of juxtarenal aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58:607–615.
11.
BruenKJFeezorRJDanielsMJ. Endovascular chimney technique versus open repair of juxtarenal and suprarenal aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53:895–905.
12.
DonasKPPecoraroFTorselloG. Use of covered chimney stents for pararenal aortic pathologies is safe and feasible with excellent patency and low incidence of endoleaks. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55:659–665.
13.
LeeJTGreenbergJIDalmanRL. Early experience with the snorkel technique for juxtarenal aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55:935–946.
14.
HiramotoJSChangCKReillyLM. Outcome of renal stenting for renal artery coverage during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49:1100–1106.
15.
Gal-OzAWolfYGRosenG. When the chimney is blocked: malignant renovascular hypertension after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. BMC Nephrol. 2013;14:71.
16.
ScaliSTFeezorRJHuberTS. Acute bilateral renal artery chimney stent thrombosis after endovascular repair of a juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm [published online November16, 2013]. J Vasc Surg. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.037.
17.
ScaliSTFeezorRJChangCK. Critical analysis of results after chimney endovascular aortic aneurysm repair raises cause for concern. J Vasc Surg. 2014; 60:865–873.
