SpiliopoulosSTheodosiadouVKoukounasV. Distal macro- and microembolization during subintimal recanalization of femoropopliteal chronic total occlusions. J Endovasc Ther. 2014;21:474–481.
2.
MendesBCOderichGSFlemingMD. Clinical significance of embolic events in patients undergoing endovascular femoropopliteal interventions with or without embolic protection devices. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59:359–367.e1.
3.
ShammasNWCoinerDShammasGA. Distal embolic event protection using excimer laser ablation in peripheral vascular interventions: results of the DEEP EMBOLI registry. J Endovasc Ther. 2009;16:197–202.
4.
ShammasNWDippelEJCoinerD. Preventing lower extremity distal embolization using embolic filter protection: results of the PROTECT registry. J Endovasc Ther. 2008;15:270–276.
5.
ShammasNW. Commentary: Subintimal angioplasty and stenting of chronic total femoropopliteal occlusions: is distal protection needed?J Endovasc Ther. 2014;21:482–484.
6.
LamRCShahSFariesPLIncidence and clinical significance of distal embolization during percutaneous interventions involving the superficial femoral artery. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46:1155–1159.
7.
ShrikhandeGVKhanSZHussainHG. Lesion types and device characteristics that predict distal embolization during percutaneous lower extremity interventions. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53:347–352.
