Carotid Stenting versus Carotid Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study

Abstract

Purpose:

To compare the results of carotid stenting and carotid surgery in a consecutive group of 455 patients (482 lesions).

Methods:

Between January 1995 and July 2002, 107 patients (114 lesions) were treated with carotid stenting and 348 patients (368 lesions) with carotid surgery. A cerebral protection device was routinely used in the last 46 stent cases. All patients were followed with duplex examination at 1 and 6 months postoperatively and yearly thereafter.

Results:

The stent and surgery groups were similar in terms of mean age (70.5 and 71.1 years, respectively), sex distribution (men 72% versus 75%), and symptoms (transient ischemic attack [TIA] or minor stroke 32.7% versus 42.2%). Median follow-up was 15 months in stent patients and 14 months in the surgical group. At 1 month postoperatively, there were 7 minor strokes (5 temporary lasting <21 days and 2 persistent) and 1 major stroke in the stent group versus 1 persistent minor stroke in the surgical patients. The overall neurological event rate (including TIA) was 10.5% versus 1.9% (p = 0.0002) in the surgical patients; cardiac morbidity was 3.5% versus 1.6% (p = NS), and the death rate was 0% versus 0.8% (p = NS). The combined permanent stroke/death rate was 2.6% in stent patients and 1.1% in surgery patients (p = NS). During follow-up, the cumulative all stroke rate was 8.8% versus 1.9% (p = 0.001), but the 3-year cumulative survival rate free from ipsilateral major neurological events was 95.2% in stent patients and 96.9% in the surgery cohort (p = NS). There was a 7.5% rate of restenosis in stented arteries versus 1.4% in surgery patients (p = 0.001).

Conclusions:

This series showed encouraging and comparable major stroke and deaths rate of carotid stenting and carotid surgery. However, there was more restenosis in the stented group on midterm follow-up.