Institutional Economic Losses Associated with AAA Repair are Independent of Technique

Abstract

Purpose:

To investigate the perception of significant economic loss associated with endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair by comparing economic variables for the open and endovascular techniques.

Methods:

In a 1-year period, 20 consecutive patients (19 men; mean age 73.3 years, range 62–89) were treated for uncomplicated infrarenal AAAs using conventional open repair in 11 and endovascular repair (EVR) in 9. For the open repair, standard techniques were employed, including transperitoneal and retroperitoneal exposures; in EVR, both the AneuRx and Ancure systems were utilized. Length of stay and institutional costs were carefully tracked and compared.

Results:

The patients were similar with regard to comorbidities, but the endograft patients were older (p=0.02) Length of stay was significantly lower in the EVR group (1.9 ± 0.9 days) compared with the open group (8.4 ± 4.5 days, p=0.0004). However, total mean treatment costs (open: $17,576 ± $11,025 and EVR: $20,247 ± $5003; p=0.51) and subsequent losses (open: –$3949 ± $7095 and EVR: –$7572 ± $4488; p=0.20) were not significantly different between the groups.

Conclusions:

The costs associated with the care of AAA patients are independent of the technique used for repair. The economic loss associated with treatment is directly related to inadequate reimbursement on the part of Medicare and other carriers.