ICAROS (Imaging in Carotid Angioplasties and Risk Of Stroke) is a multicenter international registry of carotid artery stenting designed to determine the criteria for identifying patients at higher or lower risk of periprocedural stroke and restenosis at 1 year. The aim of the registry is to improve patient selection and consequently reduce the risk of cerebral embolization during carotid stenting. The registry is open to all interventionists performing carotid stenting, and the participants are free to apply their own endovascular techniques and devices, including cerebral protection mechanisms. All cerebral ischemic events following the procedure will be reported. Follow-up surveillance to 1 year will include periodic duplex scanning and neurological examinations. Echographic plaque images will be standardized for comparison, processed for echodensity, and analyzed by computer at the Registry Center. Correlation will be investigated between the echographic index (gray-scale median) and the risk of embolism and outcome of carotid stenting.
YadavSSRoubinGSIyerSS. Elective stenting of the extracranial carotid arteries. Circulation. 1997;95:376–381.
7.
BecqueminJPQvarfordtPCastierY. Carotid angioplasty: is it safe?J Endovasc Surg.1996;3:35–41.
8.
BeebeHG. Scientific evidence demonstrating the safety of carotid angioplasty and stenting: do we have enough to draw conclusions yet?J Vasc Surg.1998;27:788–790.
9.
WelchHJ. Carotid angioplasty: a word for caution [letter]. J Endovasc Surg.1996;3:359.
10.
BergeronP. Carotid angioplasty and stenting: is endovascular treatment for cerebrovascular disease justified?J Endovasc Surg.1996;3:129–131.
11.
JordanWDVoellingerDCFisherWS. A comparison of carotid angioplasty with stenting versus endarterectomy with regional anesthesia. J Vasc Surg.1998;28:397–403.
12.
YaoJS. Angioplasty and stenting for carotid lesions: an argument against. Adv Surg.1999;32:245–254.
13.
BeebeHGKritprachaB. Carotid endarterectomy versus carotid angioplasty: comparison of current results. Semin Vasc Surg.2000;13:109–116.
14.
NewGRoubinGSIyerSS. Safety, efficacy, and durability of carotid artery stenting for restenosis following carotid endarterectomy: a multicenter study. J Endovasc Ther.2000;7:345–352.
15.
WholeyMHWholeyMHBergeronP. Current global status of carotid artery stent placement. Catheterization Cardiovasc Diagn. 1998;44:1–6.
16.
ShawlFAKadroWDomanskiMJ. Safety and efficacy of elective carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1721–1728.
17.
ZarinsCK. Carotid endarterectomy: the gold standard. J Endovasc Surg.1996;3:10–15.
18.
Al-MubarakNRoubinGSGomezCR. Carotid artery stenting in patients with high neurologic risks. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83:1411–1413.
19.
Joint Council of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, North American Chapter. Statement regarding carotid angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc Surg.1996;24:900.
20.
North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med.1991;325:445–453.
21.
European Carotid Surgery Trialists Collaborative Group. MRC European carotid surgery trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet. 1991;337:1235–1243.
22.
Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA. 1995;73:1421–1428.
23.
MaybergMRWilsonSEYatsuF. Carotid endarterectomy and prevention of cerebral ischemia in symptomatic carotid stenosis: Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program 309 Trialist Group. JAMA. 1991;266:3289–3294.
24.
HobsonRWWeissDGFieldsWS. Efficacy of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. N Engl J Med.1993;328:221–227.
25.
HobsonRW. CREST (Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stent Trial): back ground, design and current status. Semin Vasc Surg.2000;13:139–143.
26.
DiethrichEB. Indications and patient selection for intraluminal carotid treatment. J Endovasc Surg.1996;3:132–139.
27.
NewGRoubinGSIyerSS. Carotid artery stenting: rationale, indications, and results. Compr Ther.1999;25:438–445.
28.
DangasGLairdJRMehranR. Carotid artery stenting in patients with high-risk anatomy for carotid endarterectomy. J Endovasc Ther.2001;8:39–43.
29.
CarrSCCheanvechaiVVirmaniR. Histology and clinical significance of the carotid atherosclerotic plaque: implications for endovascular treatment. J Endovasc Surg.1997;4:321–325.
30.
AbuRahmaAFCovelliMARobinsonPA. The role of carotid duplex ultrasound in evaluating plaque morphology: potential use in selecting patients for carotid stenting. J Endovasc Surg.1999;6:59–65.
31.
ReidDB. Carotid plaque characterization: helpful to endarterectomy and endovascular surgeons. J Endovasc Surg.1998;5:247–250.
32.
BergeronPBecqueminJPJausseranJM. Percutaneous stenting of the internal carotid artery: the European CAST I study. J Endovasc Surg.1999;6:155–159.
33.
ThéronJCourtheouxPAlachkarF. New triple coaxial catheter system for carotid angioplasty with cerebral protection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1990;11:869–874.
34.
ThéronJ. Angioplasty of brachiocephalic vessels. In: VinuelaF. eds. Interventional Neuroradiology: Endovascular Therapy of the Central Nervous System. New York: Raven Press; 1992:167–180.
35.
KachelR. Results of balloon angioplasty in the carotid arteries. J Endovasc Surg.1996;3:22–30.
36.
HenryMAmorMHenryI. Carotid stenting with cerebral protection: first clinical experience using the PercuSurge GuardWire system. J Endovasc Surg.1999;6:321–331.
37.
ParodiJC. Initial evaluation of carotid angioplasty and stenting using 3 different cerebral protection devices [Abstract]. J Endovasc Ther.2000;7(suppl):I-30–I-31.
38.
BiasiGMSampaoloAMingazziniPM. Computer analysis of ultrasonic plaque echolucency in identifying high risk carotid bifurcation lesions. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg.1999;17:476–479.
39.
NicolaidesAN. Asymptomatic carotid stenosis and risk of stroke. Identification of a high risk group (ACSRS). A natural history study. Int Angiol. 1995;14:21–23.
40.
BiasiGMMingazziniPMBaronioL. Carotid plaque characterization using digital image processing and its potential in future studies of carotid endarterectomy and angioplasty. J Endovasc Surg.1998;5:240–246.
41.
OhkiTMarinMLLyonRT. Ex vivo human carotid artery bifurcation stenting: correlation of lesion characteristics with embolic potential. J Vasc Surg.1998;27:463–471.
ElatrozyTNicolaidesATegosT. The effect of B-mode ultrasonic image standardisation on the echodensity of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid bifurcation plaques. Int Angiol. 1998;17:179–186.
