Balzano, Anthony P., and Renate L Femandez .1982. Commentary on the "Sexual Division of Labor in African Agriculture." American Anthro-pologist84:897-898.
2.
Connell, John.1975. Labour Utilization: An Anno-tated Bibliography of Village Studies. Brighton.
3.
Connell, John.1980. Remittances and Rural Development: Migration, Dependency and Inequality in the South Pacific. Occasional Paper 22. ANU: Development Studies Centre.
4.
Connell, John, Biplab Dasgupta, Roy Laishley, and Michael Lipton.1976. Migration from Rural Areas: The Evidence from Village Studies. Delhi.
5.
Dow, Malcolm, Michael Burton, and Douglas R. White.1982. Network Autocorrelation: A Simulation Study of a Foundational Problem in Regression and Survey Research . Social Networks4:169-200.
6.
Dow, Malcolm, Douglas R. White, Michael
7.
Burton, and Karl P. Reitz.1984. Galton's Problem as Network Autocorrelation . American Ethnologist11(4): 754-770.
8.
Kish, Leslie.1987. Statistical Design for Research. New York.
9.
Lipton, Michael.1977. Why Poor People Stay Poor: A Study of Urban Bias in World Development. London.
10.
Lipton, Michael and Mick Moore.1972. The Methodology of Village Studies in Less Developed Countries. Discussion paper 10, Institute for Development Studies.
11.
Moore, Mick, John Connell and Claire M. Lambert .1976a. Village Studies: Data Analysis and Bibliography. Vol 1: India 1950-1975. C. M. Lambert, ed. London.
12.
Moore, Mick, John Connell, and Claire M. Lambert .1976b. Village Studies: Data Analysis and Bibliography. Vol 2: Africa, Middle East and North Africa, Asia (excluding India), Pacific Islands, Latin America, West Indies, and the Caribbean 1950-1975 . C. M. Lambert, ed. London.
13.
Schofield, Sue.1975. Village Nutrition Studies: An Annotated Bibliography. Brighton.
14.
White, Douglas R., and Michael L Burton .1981. Sexual Division of Labor African Agriculture: A Network Autocorrelation Analysis. Amer-ican Anthropologist83: 824-849.
15.
White, Douglas R., and Gregory F. Truex .1988. Anthropology and Cocnputing: The Challenges of the 1990s. Social Science Computer Review6(4): 481-497.