Nonverbal Behavior in Face-to-face Survey Interviews: An Analysis of Interviewer Behavior and Adequate Responding

Abstract

We examine relationships between interviewers’ nonverbal behaviors and adequate responding in face-to-face survey interviews. We videotaped professional interviewers administering face-to-face survey interviews and coded them for three interviewer nonverbal behaviors: smiling, nodding, and direct gaze. These nonverbal interviewer behaviors were associated with significant increases in the frequency of respondents’ adequate responses. Moreover, the nonverbal behaviors were equally likely to present in standardized and unstandardized utterances. These results suggest that interviewers’ nonverbal behaviors positively correlate with adequate responding without deviating from standardized interview protocols. We discuss implications for survey theory and interviewer training.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

J. S.

1958. Interviewing procedures; A manual for survey interviewers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

Belli

R. F.

Lee

E. H.

Stafford

F. P.

Chou

C.-H.

. 2004. Calendar and question-list survey methods: Association between interviewer behaviors and data quality. Journal of Official Statistics 20:185.

Benney

Riesman

A Star

. 1956. Age and sex in the interview. American Journal of Sociology 62:143–52.

Bernieri

F. J.

Gillis

J. S.

Davis

J. M.

Grahe

J. E.

. 1996. Dyad rapport and the accuracy of its judgement across situations: A lens model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71:110–29.

Buller

D. B.

Street

R. L.

Jr.

1991. The role of communication in patients evaluations of health care and compliance decisions. Southwestern Communication Journal 56:230–37.

Cannell

C. F.

Axelrod

. 1956. The respondent reports on the interview. American Journal of Sociology 62:177–81.

Cassell

Gill

A. J.

Tepper

P. A.

. 2007. Coordination in conversation and rapport. In ACL workshop on embodied natural language. Prague, CZ: The Association for Computational Linguistics.

Dijkstra

1987. Interviewing style and respondent behavior. Sociological Methods and Research 16:309–34.

Dijkstra

2009. Sequence viewer reference (Version 5). Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit.

10.

Dijkstra

Ongena

. 2006. Question–answer sequences in survey-interviews. Quality & Quantity 40:983–1011.

11.

Duggan

A. P.

Parrott

R. L.

. 2001. Physicians’ nonverbal rapport building and patients’ talk about the subjective component of illness. Human Communication Research 27:299–311.

12.

Garbarski

Schaeffer

N. C.

Dykema

. 2016. Interviewing practices, conversational practices, and rapport: Responsiveness and engagement in the standardized survey interview. Sociological Methodology 46:1–38.

13.

Glenberg

A. M.

Schroeder

J. L.

Robertson

D. A.

. 1998. Averting the gaze disengages the environment and facilitates remembering. Memory & Cognition 26:651–58.

14.

Goudy

W. J.

Potter

H. R.

. 1975. Interview rapport: Demise of a concept. The Public Opinion Quarterly 39:529–43.

15.

Hall

J. A.

1978. Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin 85:845–57.

16.

Hill

R. J.

Hall

N. E.

. 1963. A note on rapport and the quality of interview data. Southwestern Social Science Quarterly 44:247–55.

17.

Holbrook

A. L.

Green

M. C.

Krosnick

J. A.

. 2003. Telephone versus face-to-face interviewing of national probability samples with long questionnaires. Public Opinion Quarterly 67:79–125.

18.

Houtkoop-Steenstra

1997. Being friendly in survey interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 28:591–623.

19.

Lavin

Maynard

D. W.

. 2001. Standardization vs. rapport: Respondent laughter and interviewer reaction during telephone surveys. American Sociological Review 66:453–79.

20.

Matarazzo

J. D.

Weins

A. N.

. 1977. Speech behavior as an objective correlate of empathy and outcome in interview and psychotherapy research. Behavior Modification 1:453–80.

21.

Mensch

B. S.

Kandel

D. B.

. 1988. Underreporting of substance use in a national longitudinal youth cohort: Individual and interviewer effects. Public Opinion Quarterly 52:100–24.

22.

Ong

L. M. L.

de Haes

J. C. J. M.

Hoos

A. M.

Lammes

F. B.

. 1995. Doctor–Patient communication: A review of the literature. Social Science and Medicine 40:903–18.

23.

Robinson

J. D.

2006. Nonverbal communication and physician–patient interaction. In The Sage handbook of nonverbal communication, eds. Manusov

V. L.

Patterson

M. L.

, 437–59. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

24.

Schober

M. F.

Conrad

F. G.

Dijkstra

Ongena

Y. P.

. 2012. Disfluencies and gaze aversion in unreliable responses to survey questions. Journal of Official Statistics 28:555.

25.

Sun

Conrad

F. G.

Kreuter

. 2020. The relationship between Interviewer–Respondent rapport and data quality. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology. Online first article number smz043.

26.

Tickle-Degnen

Rosenthal

. 1990. The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychological Inquiry 1:285–93.

27.

van Dulmen

A. M.

Verhaak

P. F. M.

Bilo

H. J. G.

. 1997. Shifts in doctor–patient communication during a series of outpatient consultations in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Patient Education and Counseling 30:227–37.

28.

Weiss

C. H.

1970. Interaction in the research interview: The effects of rapport on response. In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Social Statistics Section. 18–19. Alexandria, VA: ASA.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.26 MB