Walking interviews generate contextualized dialogs and place-based narratives prompted by sites and routes. We used walking interviews with three refugee-background women in Australia to find out what the act of walking could reveal about notions of home and broader narratives of forced migration. We used a participatory approach to privilege women’s perspectives as co-creators of new knowledge on the topic.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlewettJ.HanlonN.. 2016. Disablement as inveterate condition: Living with habitual ableism in Prince George, British Columbia. The Canadian Geographer60:46–55.
BraunV.ClarkeV.. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3:77–101.
4.
CarpianoR. M.2009. Come take a walk with me: The “go-along” interview as a novel method for studying the implications of place for health and well-being. Health and Place15:263–72.
5.
CastrodaleM. A.2018. Mobilizing dis/ability research: A critical discussion of qualitative go-along interviews in practice. Qualitative Inquiry24:45–55.
6.
ClandininD. J.ConnellyF. M.. 2000. Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
ClarkA.EmmelN.. 2010. Using walking interviews. Morgan Centre, University of Manchester. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/1323/ (accessed December 20, 2020).
8.
De LeonJ. P.CohenJ. H.. 2005. Object and walking probes in ethnographic interviewing. Field Methods17:200–04.
9.
EvansJ.JonesP.. 2011. The walking interview: Methodology, mobility and place. Applied Geography31:849–58.
10.
GarciaC. M.EisenbergM. E.FrerichE. A.LechnerK. E.LustK.. 2012. Conducting go-along interviews to understand context and promote health. Qualitative Health Research22:1395–403.
11.
JonesP.BunceG.EvansJ.GibbsH.. 2008. Exploring space and place with walking interviews. Journal of Research Practice4:1–9.
12.
JonesP.EvansJ.. 2011. The spatial transcript: Analysing mobilities through qualitative gis. Area44:92–99.
13.
KinneyP.2018. Walking interview ethics. In Qualitative research ethics, edited by IphofenR.TolichM., 174–87. London: Sage.
14.
KusenbachM.2003. Street phenomenology: The go-along as ethnographic tool. Ethnography4:455–85.
15.
LenetteC.2019. Arts-based methods in refugee research: Creating sanctuary. Singapore: Springer.
16.
LenetteC.BotfieldJ.BoydellK.HaireB.NewmanC.ZwiA.. 2018. Beyond compliance checking: A situated approach to visual research ethics. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry15:293–303.
17.
LenetteC.StavropoulouN.NunnC.KongS. T.CookT.CoddingtonK.BanksS.. 2019. Brushed under the carpet: Examining the complexities of participatory research (PR). Research for All3:161–79.
18.
O’NeillM.2018. Walking, well-being and community: Racialized mothers building cultural citizenship using participatory arts and participatory action research. Ethnic and Racial Studies41:73–97.
19.
O’NeillM.ErelU.KaptaniE.ReynoldsT.. 2019. Borders, risk and belonging: Challenges for arts-based research in understanding the lives of women asylum seekers and migrants “at the borders of humanity.”Crossings: Journal of Migration & Culture10:129–47.
20.
PinkS.2007. Walking with video. Visual Studies22:240–52.
21.
SpringgayS.TrumanS. E.. 2018. Walking methodologies in a more-than-human world: WalkingLab. London: Routledge.
